Package Details: nagstamon 2.0.1-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: nagstamon
Description: Nagios status monitor for the desktop
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: ghostbuster
Maintainer: ghostbuster
Last Packager: ghostbuster
Votes: 8
Popularity: 0.014041
First Submitted: 2015-08-09 16:15
Last Updated: 2016-10-23 20:04

Latest Comments

riek42 commented on 2017-02-01 01:23

after installation I had trouple starting nagstamon, because of a segmentation fault.
I found the following issue in the official github repository:

Turns out I installed "xfce4" without "xfce4-goodies", after installing "xfce4-notifyd", I was able to start nagstamon without problems.

Hope that helps anybody with the same problem.

ogarcia commented on 2017-01-17 11:29

@ghostbuster I found the issue. Simply rebuild package do the trick. I think that a Python update may be the culprit.

ghostbuster commented on 2017-01-11 21:57

Currently I'm unable to reproduce the traceback you reported. After a quick review of both PGKBUILD files and both source trees I don't see any obvious reason why the two packages should behave different.

Is the traceback reproducible if you reinstall nagstamon? Do you use python3 as default python interpreter (/usr/bin/python points to python3). If the problem is reproducible with a installed nagstamon, does '/usr/bin/python -m Nagstamon.Config' exit without out error message and return code 0? What about '/usr/bin/python -I -m Nagstamon.Config'?

ogarcia commented on 2017-01-09 08:54

The package seems broken:

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/nagstamon", line 36, in <module>
from Nagstamon.Config import (conf,
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'Nagstamon'

Note: nagstamon-beta works fine

clep commented on 2016-10-22 13:45

PKGBUILD is outdated not the whole package.

Changes needed for:
Version pkgver=2.0 -> pkgver=2.0.1
Don't forget the md5 and sha256 sums:

ogarcia commented on 2016-10-20 07:05

You forget the qt5-svg dependency ;)

ghostbuster commented on 2016-08-25 19:04

I created a nagstamon-beta package for all, who want to test the 2.0-beta.

DennisSch commented on 2016-07-13 13:30

I didn't test it yet, but nagstamon2 is already in beta, so it could be considered for updating in my opinion.

jwhipp commented on 2016-01-18 19:37

+1 for Alpha.

ogarcia commented on 2015-10-27 19:06

Great. Much better now!

I also agree not to upgrade the package to 2.0 alpha.

All comments