Package Details: neo-matrix 0.6.1-3

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/neo-matrix.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: neo-matrix
Description: Simulates the digital rain from "The Matrix"
Upstream URL: https://github.com/st3w/neo
Licenses: GPL3
Submitter: dusansimic
Maintainer: imcb
Last Packager: imcb
Votes: 11
Popularity: 0.110256
First Submitted: 2021-12-19 10:47 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-29 15:50 (UTC)

Dependencies (2)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

dusansimic commented on 2024-05-29 15:51 (UTC)

@jmcb I named the package neo-matrix since neo-git already exists, which would be a VSC variant of package called neo. It is true that the neo package itself doesn't exist but it could cause confusion since they are not the same program.

imcb commented on 2024-05-29 15:37 (UTC)

@zoorat I don't see any reason for the package not to just be called neo. it doesn't already exist, and pacman -F neo doesn't show any files it would conflict with. I just adopted the package so I'll make this change if people agree

zoorat commented on 2023-11-15 07:05 (UTC)

this package only comes with /usr/bin/neo-matrix but man page's EXAMPLES says

Example 0: Just run it
    neo
Example 1: Sets a faster, asynchronous scrolling speed with 256 colors
    neo -S 12 -a --color=green3 --colormode=256
...

can u edit the manpage or create symlink /usr/bin/neo ??

dusansimic commented on 2022-10-20 20:12 (UTC)

@saltedcoffii Thanks for suggesting the change! I've added the --program-suffix option to the configure command and also the --prefix option so it's made sure that make install does the right thing. Also thank you for adding the package to the Arch Wiki!

saltedcoffii commented on 2022-10-20 10:32 (UTC)

Have you considered using a --program-suffix='-matrix' configure argument instead of moving the manpage and binary manually? I tested it, and it works.

saltedcoffii commented on 2022-08-11 14:03 (UTC)

I added this package to the ArchWiki at https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/ASCII_art.

dusansimic commented on 2022-01-07 11:10 (UTC)

@kleintux Nothing I see there states that tarballs are preferred over git sources, even the validation of checksum. I might have missed it so let me know. Usually a preferred source is one that is signed but since neither is signed in this case, there is no preference.

dusansimic commented on 2021-12-24 20:28 (UTC)

@kleintux thanks for the comment. Is there any particular reason why that should be done? I prefer using git commit since it's more reliable.