Package Details: neovim-nightly-bin 0.9.0+dev+1115+g446c353a5-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: neovim-nightly-bin
Description: Fork of Vim aiming to improve user experience, plugins, and GUIs (nightly build)
Upstream URL:
Licenses: custom:neovim
Conflicts: neovim
Provides: neovim, vim-plugin-runtime
Submitter: quebin31
Maintainer: eclairevoyant
Last Packager: eclairevoyant
Votes: 58
Popularity: 1.11
First Submitted: 2020-12-27 19:08 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-03-04 16:00 (UTC)

Dependencies (6)

Required by (431)

Sources (4)

Pinned Comments

quebin31 commented on 2021-10-07 15:37 (UTC)

This PKGBUILD uses the current date to refresh the source url, once it's downloaded the pkgver() function should update the version accordingly.

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »

xiota commented on 2023-12-01 00:02 (UTC) (edited on 2023-12-01 00:03 (UTC) by xiota)

See comment on GitHub for solution to version monotonicity, cached downloads, and related issues.

REmorin commented on 2023-10-03 23:27 (UTC)

@eclairevoyant, I use chaotic-aur, and sometimes I get the "error":

warning: neovim-nightly-bin: local (0.10.0+dev+9afbfb4-1) is newer than chaotic-aur (0.10.0+dev+09a17f9-1)

So I have to manually do pacman -Syu neovim-nightly-bin. Is there a way to change the pkgver string, so this doesn't happen? Like the "count" number before the commit substring?

eclairevoyant commented on 2023-07-14 05:03 (UTC) (edited on 2023-07-20 00:30 (UTC) by eclairevoyant)

@cjquines don't flag OOD unless there's something wrong with the package, also next time read pinned commments

eclairevoyant commented on 2023-03-04 15:46 (UTC)

Adopted and updated.

In the future, please keep in mind that commenting repeatedly that a package is out-of-date will not improve the situation; if you see a package that's out-of-date and not getting the necessary attention, you can reach out to the maintainer separately or file an orphan request.

mikaelelkiaer commented on 2023-01-18 06:47 (UTC)

Can anyone remove the out-of-date flag?

umop3plsdn commented on 2022-12-22 12:57 (UTC)

Why is this falsely flagged out of date? I thought something was wrong with it when I searched via Paru. I would have never known if I didn't think of coming physically here to see what was wrong with it to find nothing at all. REMOVE THE FLAG

jruh7 commented on 2022-11-16 11:46 (UTC)

In the PKGBUILD, shouldn't it be pkgver instead of _pkgver in the 'provides' variable?

Superb_Z commented on 2022-10-20 05:47 (UTC)

Wrongly flagged as out of date.

sleeping commented on 2022-07-28 14:30 (UTC)

It's up to date. Can someone remove the flag?