Package Details: nessus 7.0.2-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: nessus
Description: Vulnerability scanner
Upstream URL:
Licenses: custom
Submitter: r4um
Maintainer: MattEverson (uberben)
Last Packager: MattEverson
Votes: 55
Popularity: 0.027249
First Submitted: 2007-03-11 15:14
Last Updated: 2018-02-15 15:49

Required by (0)

Sources (3)

Latest Comments

dresan commented on 2018-04-17 06:55

Does it autoupdate properly after the initial install or needs to be updated via AUR?. Thanks!

coreb1t commented on 2018-03-21 22:05

Version 7.0.3 available Nessus-7.0.3-fc20.x86_64.rpm - MD5: 384ceff2344f2e3a146d14ba149a4788

bararchy commented on 2018-02-28 07:50

I keep getting this error curl: (3) Illegal characters found in URL ==> ERROR: Failure while downloading -> Could not get the download token, '_retoken' might need an update

Don't know if it's relevant but I use zsh

jnbrains commented on 2018-02-16 11:38

malfunc commented on 2018-02-07 16:06

changing the download file in the pkgbuild to "" solves the issue

thealamenthe commented on 2018-02-05 21:37

It seems that _gettoken() is no longer working. I'm receiving: " -> Could not get the download token, '_retoken' might need an update"

xsmile commented on 2017-09-11 17:08

I modified the current files with Larivact's suggestions (except 4.) and did some other minor changes:

Fedora should be more up-to-date than RHEL or CentOS. RHEL 7 doesn't support 32-bit installations by the way.

Larivact commented on 2017-08-18 04:22

Some suggestions:
1) Change the Upstream URL to as appears to be down.
2) Change the description to: "A proprietary vulnerability scanner available free of charge for personal use."
3) Since the curl to fetch the token is silent, echo "fetching token" before invoking _gettoken, so that users aren't confused if the site takes to load.
4) post_install should mention /opt/nessus/sbin/nessuscli
5) post_remove should echo "You might want to remove the remaining files in /opt/nessus/."

RoestVrijStaal commented on 2017-08-12 17:18

Why is the Fedora RPM used? It lacks a i386 build, which is impractical when changing the PKGBUILD to the right architecture :/

Did anyone had a successful install by using the Red Hat ES7 / CentOS' RPM instead?

MattWoelk commented on 2017-02-01 16:40

@xsmile Found and fixed the problem. Thanks for the report!

All comments