Package Details: nessus 10.8.3-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/nessus.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: nessus
Description: Nessus vulnerability scanner
Upstream URL: https://www.tenable.com/downloads/nessus
Keywords: scanner security vulnerability
Licenses: custom
Submitter: r4um
Maintainer: noraj
Last Packager: noraj
Votes: 71
Popularity: 0.003580
First Submitted: 2007-03-11 15:14 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-12 19:58 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

noraj commented on 2022-05-30 21:23 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-30 18:09 (UTC) by noraj)

⚠️⚠️⚠️

When the download link is dead just report as outdated, it's not an error it's just a new version is available.

⚠️⚠️⚠️

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next › Last »

thestinger commented on 2012-05-02 23:15 (UTC)

@tocer: it needs to be downloaded from the nessus site, since you have to accept their TOS. The PKGBUILD has a comment with a link.

tocer commented on 2012-05-02 10:06 (UTC)

I got error: Nessus-5.0.1-fc16.x86_64.rpm was not found in the build directory and is not a URL.

thestinger commented on 2012-05-01 16:25 (UTC)

There's only a web interface now, the separate client is deprecated.

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-05-01 16:22 (UTC)

nessusd was failing the md5 check on my 64 bit system, so I changed the PKGBUILD like this: md5sums=('32ced6c326943d00f00576bcf7ace2b4' '' '389dab32c24f0f70bfab18c8f7df5892' '8c5772ac63f97d94475fe03e80d6ba5c' '8ff98bc9488304fcb66753d3cfb5f30e' 'd9d25d4075acc50c0050c7a4f244c7cb') That got it to pass the check and build the package fine. I noticed there's no client download anywhere on the tenable site, is it included with the server now?

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-02-17 14:46 (UTC)

got it working by changing the md5sum in PKGBUILD with the recent one from the nesus website

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-02-17 14:29 (UTC)

can you help on this one? Validation source files with md5sums... Nessus-5.0.0-fc16.i686.rpm ... FAILED ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

thestinger commented on 2012-01-25 13:12 (UTC)

@t3ddy: thanks, updated I didn't realize makepkg had the "fall back to bsdtar" feature :).

t3ddy commented on 2012-01-25 12:57 (UTC)

rpmextract is not needed, a pkgbuild like: http://pastebin.com/rMa9ENWy works fine

venom commented on 2012-01-02 17:51 (UTC)

works perfect, thank you

thestinger commented on 2012-01-01 19:25 (UTC)

@venom: I used i686 instead of i386 in the filename, it should be fixed now.