Package Details: netatalk 3.1.18-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/netatalk.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: netatalk
Description: Open-source implementation of the Apple Filing Protocol
Upstream URL: https://netatalk.sourceforge.io
Keywords: afp appletalk
Licenses: GPL2
Conflicts: netatalk-ddp, netatalk2
Submitter: Snowman
Maintainer: denn
Last Packager: denn
Votes: 96
Popularity: 0.000146
First Submitted: 2007-03-31 06:19 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-10-28 16:06 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next › Last »

nickl commented on 2011-07-23 12:24 (UTC)

andrej84: Isn't it just a new PKGBUILD? Just post the text of it up to pastebin or something similar. If there are patches that need to be applied, just link or pastebin them too. If you really need to post a tar file put it on megaupload or rapidshare or mediafire.

andrej84 commented on 2011-07-22 14:46 (UTC)

The problem is that I find no service to host a simple tar file (incredibly). Any suggestions about that? Otherwise I'll send it to the maintaner or the mailing list...

nickl commented on 2011-07-22 11:56 (UTC)

andrej84. yes! and also post it up on pastebin or the like and drop a link here. if wodar doesn't respond, you can email the aur list and ask them to orphan the package and you can become a maintainer.

andrej84 commented on 2011-07-22 09:16 (UTC)

I created a new package for 2.1.15 with the fixes of all the issues cited here (PID quoted, cdb support and 744 permissions to afpd.service). Should I send it to the responsible for netatalk?

munkoil commented on 2011-07-10 06:35 (UTC)

I'm having trouble with netatalk after upgrading db to 5.2.28-1. It works fine when I downgrade to 5.1.25-1 again. Any suggestions?

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-05-07 14:54 (UTC)

i made quick and dirty fix - http://lex.io/pub/netatalk-2.2-1.src.tar.gz at least with that version i can use timemachine in mac os x 10.7 and it does not throws shitload of error anymore.

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-04-20 00:49 (UTC)

It would be nice to see the package updated to 2.2 beta or at least 2.1.5 THANKS

emphire commented on 2011-03-26 00:14 (UTC)

Note that pkgrel usually starts at 1, not 0. Thanks!

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-03-13 02:34 (UTC)

I had to put quotes around $PID on lines 10 and 22 of /etc/rc.d/afpd, otherwise bash complained about a binary operator expected.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next › Last »