Package Details: netsniff-ng 0.6.3-3

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/netsniff-ng.git (read-only)
Package Base: netsniff-ng
Description: A high performance Linux network sniffer for packet inspection.
Upstream URL: http://netsniff-ng.org/
Licenses: GPL2
Submitter: dcelasun
Maintainer: dcelasun
Last Packager: dcelasun
Votes: 10
Popularity: 0.803722
First Submitted: 2010-04-09 16:06
Last Updated: 2017-05-12 10:01

Pinned Comments

dcelasun commented on 2017-05-12 08:48

Before running makepkg, please import the key first:

gpg --recv-key 236B0FE9B5510F47

You need to run the above command with the same user running makepkg, *not* as root!

Latest Comments

dcelasun commented on 2017-05-12 10:02

I could have sworn I added that, weird... Anyway, fixed.

anthraxx commented on 2017-05-12 09:51

you will need to add the acceptable gpg key in order to make it work as expected, otherwise you don't validate who is supposed to issue a signature for this package:

validpgpkeys=('C3DE742283C246F2D7887AB4236B0FE9B5510F47') # Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>

dcelasun commented on 2017-05-12 08:48

Before running makepkg, please import the key first:

gpg --recv-key 236B0FE9B5510F47

You need to run the above command with the same user running makepkg, *not* as root!

dcelasun commented on 2017-05-12 08:46

@anthraxx: Done.

anthraxx commented on 2017-05-11 22:40

@dcelasun: seems there are upstream signatures, may you apply those?

dcelasun commented on 2017-05-11 12:22

Updated to 0.6.3, thanks!

arch3y commented on 2017-05-11 01:06

I made a few tweaks and updated netsniff-ng to v0.6.3,

https://gist.github.com/archey/5cb0a321e6a3203437a46a9270eac114

dcelasun commented on 2017-03-25 08:24

@zorun: I've backported the patch and it seems to build fine under kernel 4.10. Please let me know if there are any problems.

dcelasun commented on 2017-03-22 20:05

OK, I'll try to take a look as soon as I can :)

zorun commented on 2017-03-22 19:05

dcelasun, thank you, but the issue is that *this* package does not build currently :)

Hence why I was asking if this particular patch could be backported, before the the next release.

All comments