Package Details: networkmanager-dispatcher-pdnsd 2.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/networkmanager-dispatcher-pdnsd.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: networkmanager-dispatcher-pdnsd
Description: Dispatcher Script for pDNSd; works with systemd and sysvinit
Upstream URL: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/NetworkManager
Keywords: dispatcher dns networkmanager pdnsd script systemd sysvinit
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: Freso
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: Freso
Votes: 6
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2012-01-03 08:49 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2015-07-12 19:18 (UTC)

Required by (0)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

Freso commented on 2012-09-30 15:31 (UTC)

And ignore my previous comment. "NetworkManager-wait-online.service" didn't seem to work out for me. While the SysV comment still stands, I've updated the script to work with both SysV ("init") and systemd now. I haven't tested it with SysV though, so any feedback on that (here or on GitHub: https://github.com/Freso/PKGBUILDs/) would be welcome. Patches too. ;)

Freso commented on 2012-09-06 18:04 (UTC)

I believe this package is obsolete now; 1) If you're still using SysV init, read https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/NetworkManager#Use_.2Fetc.2Frc.conf_to_control_services_started_by_networkmanager 2) If you've switched to systemd, use "NetworkManager-wait-online.service" instead of "NetworkManager.service" I will possibly eventually update the package with roughly the same information.

Freso commented on 2012-03-10 09:51 (UTC)

I have had the correct version running locally, but forgot to add it to Git, and thus had the bad version packaged and uploaded. Oops. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. It should've been remedied now.

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-03-09 19:33 (UTC)

Hi there! Have you noticed that your pdnsd_going_up() function is totally screwed??? Sure, rc.d start and rc.d restart is cool, but why not tell that poor rc.d script which daemon you actually want to (re)start? Have you actually tried this before uploading??? Because it's not working. But surely you got it right in the going_down() function, that's a positive.