Search Criteria
Package Details: nm-tray 0.5.1-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/nm-tray.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | nm-tray |
| Description: | Simple Qt-based frontend for NetworkManager with icon in system tray |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/palinek/nm-tray |
| Licenses: | GPL-2.0-or-later |
| Submitter: | zhangkaizhao |
| Maintainer: | xiota (creyon) |
| Last Packager: | xiota |
| Votes: | 2 |
| Popularity: | 0.000000 |
| First Submitted: | 2020-12-18 10:44 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-09-13 12:35 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- networkmanager-qt (networkmanager-qt-gitAUR)
- cmake (cmake3AUR, cmake-gitAUR) (make)
- ninja (ninja-gitAUR, ninja-memAUR, ninja-noemacs-gitAUR, ninja-kitwareAUR, ninja-fuchsia-gitAUR) (make)
- qt6-tools (make)
Required by (1)
- networkmanager-support (optional)
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
creyon commented on 2023-11-16 13:01 (UTC)
Yeah, scratch that. It's much more likely that it happened because of some new flags in my makepkg.conf. Should've thought of that before.
creyon commented on 2023-11-16 10:15 (UTC)
Can confirm the new cmake build works fine on my system, albeit with an extra ~500kb binary size.
@kelsonv, I'll add aarch64 to the arch list. Let me know if you encounter any issues. I won't increment the pkgrel, since it shouldn't affect existing installs.
kelsonv commented on 2023-11-05 21:59 (UTC)
FYI, I was successfully able to build this package on aarch64 just by adding the arch to the PKGBUILD file. I've got it running on my LxQt destkop on a PineTab2, and it seems to be working as expected.
creyon commented on 2023-10-25 08:08 (UTC)
@fdo10, That issue should be fixed already. The package depends on networkmanager-qt5 now instead of networkmanager-qt. Perhaps try installing again? The package version should be 0.5.0-2.
fdo10 commented on 2023-10-25 08:00 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-25 08:01 (UTC) by fdo10)
Intresting discussion about "tasks" for potential comaintainers...
I have the same issue: "installing networkmanager-qt5 (5.111.0-1) breaks dependency 'networkmanager-qt' required by nm-tray"
creyon commented on 2023-10-21 10:24 (UTC)
Fair enough, I'm convinced. I was mainly concerned that you'd be absent, which you certainly seem not to be.
creyon commented on 2023-10-20 19:49 (UTC)
@xiota Well, I found at least one email before writing that comment. If you have multiple, and I've picked a silly one that isn't relevant to my request, well, my first task for you is to figure out which one I'm emailing my request to. Good luck.
[Seriously, though - no, my intent wasn't to comaintain the package, I just wanted to point out that any potential comaintainers would not be able to contact you easily. I lack the social intuition to determine whether you were joking about it being a "task". If it is a joke, I would argue it's not funny enough to warrant potentially making the software less secure or reliable in the event of somebody actually needing to contact you. If it's not a joke, the place to begin a task is after somebody has successfully contacted you. At that point, you're free to impose whatever tests you deem necessary in order to determine whether a prospective comaintainer is indeed pure of heart and deserving of the title. But that's just my two cents, I don't know what I'm doing.]
1 2 Next › Last »