| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/notesnook-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | notesnook-bin |
| Description: | A fully open source & end-to-end encrypted note taking alternative to Evernote (binary release) |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/streetwriters/notesnook |
| Keywords: | & a alternative bin binary electron encrypted end-to-end evernote note notes open source to |
| Licenses: | GPL-3.0-or-later |
| Conflicts: | notesnook |
| Provides: | notesnook |
| Submitter: | qustavo |
| Maintainer: | begin-theadventu |
| Last Packager: | begin-theadventu |
| Votes: | 6 |
| Popularity: | 0.51 |
| First Submitted: | 2022-09-05 10:12 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-05-05 22:33 (UTC) |
Notesnook-bin is not able to update, erroring out:
mv: cannot stat 'usr': No such file or directory
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package().
Aborting...
-> error making: notesnook-bin-exit status 4
-> Failed to install the following packages. Manual intervention is required:
notesnook-bin - exit status 4
sha256sum check for arm64 is now skipped, as I don't use this arch and I don't want to download the file with each release.
If you use it, feel free to provide me with the sums.
@ajgraves Yes. I previously linked my PKGBUILD that repackages it.
I'll move it here as I just adopted the package.
Honestly, the moderation should add a new rule that all packages that install only the AppImage must have the suffix -appimage.
For example, upscayl-bin installs only the AppImage even though .rpm. and .deb are available.
Honest question here, what is the difference between this package and the package notesnook-appimage? Both seem to do the same thing, installing the appimage.
@artorias Could you add changes to extract the AppImage and install the extracted files instead?
EDIT: link deleted.
I also changed a few other things.
I agree with @usc that the aur package needs to handle versioning of the downloadable files for an upstream project that doesn't tag each release file with a version number. I maintain the tutanota-desktop-bin package and had to implement this as well to prevent users from having issues each upgrade.
@usc Maybe you can try to do this after you have installed the software:paru -Scc to delete the old files.
Pinned Comments
begin-theadventu commented on 2023-06-21 08:17 (UTC) (edited on 2023-06-21 08:22 (UTC) by begin-theadventu)
sha256sum check for arm64 is now skipped, as I don't use this arch and I don't want to download the file with each release.
If you use it, feel free to provide me with the sums.