Package Details: noto-fonts-sc 2:20210430-2

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: noto-fonts-sc
Description: Noto CJK-SC fonts for Simplified Chinese
Upstream URL:
Keywords: chinese cjk cn fonts noto zh
Licenses: custom: SIL
Submitter: halflife
Maintainer: xuanruiqi
Last Packager: xuanruiqi
Votes: 8
Popularity: 0.000002
First Submitted: 2016-04-12 06:57 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2022-08-15 17:21 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

syvshc commented on 2022-07-14 03:28 (UTC)

I found that there isn't "NotoSansCJKsc-Black.otf" in the package.

xuanruiqi commented on 2021-09-01 15:49 (UTC)

Now I got it. Fixed.

sng commented on 2021-09-01 10:49 (UTC)

@Heptazhou, I have finally managed to install this, using your edit. Thanks for that!

Heptazhou commented on 2021-08-31 00:15 (UTC) (edited on 2021-08-31 00:16 (UTC) by Heptazhou)

but @alvin_rxg seems to be right...

correct ones:


alvin_rxg commented on 2021-08-30 18:20 (UTC)

i'm always getting the sha256 checksum error on version 2:20210430-1. NotoSansCJKsc-Regular.otf and NotoSansMonoCJKsc-Regular.otf maybe the files from github cdn are different.

for example NotoSansCJKsc-Regular.otf:

> wget ''
--2021-08-30 20:16:10--
Loaded CA certificate '/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt'
Resolving (
Connecting to (||:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found
Location: [following]
--2021-08-30 20:16:10--
Resolving (,,, ...
Connecting to (||:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 16437364 (16M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: ‘NotoSansCJKsc-Regular.otf’

NotoSansCJKsc-Regular.otf                                100%[==>]  15,68M  6,91MB/s    in 2,3s

2021-08-30 20:16:12 (6,91 MB/s) - ‘NotoSansCJKsc-Regular.otf’ saved [16437364/16437364]

and the checksum:

> sha256sum NotoSansCJKsc-Regular.otf 
2c76254f6fc379fddfce0a7e84fb5385bb135d3e399294f6eeb6680d0365b74b  NotoSansCJKsc-Regular.otf

xuanruiqi commented on 2021-08-30 15:58 (UTC)

First of all, please don't use the flag functionality for "checksums don't work". It's only for when the package is outdated; if it isn't, use the comments.

That being said, I've definitely checked the checksums and I've been able to build the package myself. If you'd do a totally clean build (makepkg -Cc), I think the checksums will work.

ignormies commented on 2019-06-25 21:57 (UTC)

Thanks for adopting the package. Checksums initially did not work, but clean building fixed it

xuanruiqi commented on 2019-06-19 22:56 (UTC)

I hope there are no problems with installation, especially with the checksums... At least they work fine on my machine.