Search Criteria
Package Details: ntsync-dkms 6.12.6-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/ntsync.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | ntsync |
Description: | NT synchronization primitive driver - out-of-tree module |
Upstream URL: | https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240519202454.1192826-1-zfigura@codeweavers.com/ |
Licenses: | GPL-2.0-only WITH Linux-syscall-note |
Conflicts: | ntsync |
Provides: | NTSYNC-MODULE |
Submitter: | loathingkernel |
Maintainer: | loathingkernel |
Last Packager: | loathingkernel |
Votes: | 3 |
Popularity: | 0.90 |
First Submitted: | 2024-01-25 00:30 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-12-22 15:22 (UTC) |
Dependencies (3)
- dkms (dkms-gitAUR)
- ntsync-commonAUR
- ntsync-headerAUR (optional) – Allow Wine to be compiled with ntsync support
Required by (2)
- wine-osu-spectator (requires NTSYNC-MODULE) (optional)
- wine-osu-spectator-wow64 (requires NTSYNC-MODULE) (optional)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3
loathingkernel commented on 2024-02-02 09:07 (UTC) (edited on 2024-02-02 10:11 (UTC) by loathingkernel)
Hello, yes it was a conscious decision because I couldn't think of a good reason for this many configurable switches, as well as making the PKGBUILD harder to quickly parse. It is my opinion that PKGBUILD scripts should be easy to parse for anyone without having to follow a lot of conditionals, they are not applications.
I am considering adding back the packaged kernel module for the default kernel, but it doesn't make much sense since
dkms
will take care of that.What other features are missing which could be considered useful?
openglfreak commented on 2024-02-02 05:15 (UTC)
Hello @loathingkernel, it looks like you removed several features from my winesync PKGBUILD, which this seems to be based on. Is there a reason for this? Could you add them back?
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3