Package Details: nvidia-340xx-dkms 340.108-37

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-340xx.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: nvidia-340xx
Description: NVIDIA driver sources for linux, 340xx legacy branch
Upstream URL: https://www.nvidia.com/
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: nvidia, nvidia-340xx
Provides: nvidia-340xx
Submitter: simonsmh
Maintainer: JerryXiao
Last Packager: JerryXiao
Votes: 72
Popularity: 0.73
First Submitted: 2019-06-07 10:29 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-10 16:52 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

JerryXiao commented on 2022-10-13 03:51 (UTC) (edited on 2022-10-14 02:44 (UTC) by JerryXiao)

For testing users, contributors: check out https://github.com/archlinux-jerry/nvidia-340xx
Warning: force push may happen to match the aur tree

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 .. 58 Next › Last »

vicpt commented on 2021-02-24 21:07 (UTC)

@graysky let the package in -16 with historical patches for now. We need to test different xorg configs just to be sure.

vicpt commented on 2021-02-24 21:05 (UTC)

Same thing with -16 no OpenGL. It can be xorg server related configs...

graysky commented on 2021-02-24 20:59 (UTC)

Let me know if the original patches or new patches give different results. I can add a post_install that directs users to create the needed config once you guys tell me which patches to use.

vicpt commented on 2021-02-24 20:38 (UTC) (edited on 2021-02-24 20:42 (UTC) by vicpt)

@bieel1503 at first I didn't. Now after trying few games that used to work I noticed they stop working. What package are you using, -14 or -15? @graysky reverted the patches he used in -15 to the original ones used in -14 to build the new one -16.

I'm gonna test -16 (with historical patches plus the new one for 5.11) and report back.

bieel1503 commented on 2021-02-24 19:49 (UTC)

@vicpt It worked, thank you very much. But have you noticed a problem with OpenGL? It just won't work, somehow.

vicpt commented on 2021-02-24 19:35 (UTC)

@graysky having that minimal config file included in the package must cause problems for users that have specific configurations, so maybe informing users they need that file in order to have xorg server loading the correct legacy driver should be useful. Maybe a pinned post?

graysky commented on 2021-02-24 19:22 (UTC)

@vicpt - OK, I will push -16 which is just -14 (my patches + the new one).

Recommend that you share your results on the appropriate wiki page.

vicpt commented on 2021-02-24 18:01 (UTC)

If anyone want a minimal Xorg configuration file to specify the "nvidia" driver instead "nv" one here it is, in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-nvidia.conf :

Section "Device"
        Identifier "Nvidia Card"
        Driver "nvidia"
        VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation"
EndSection

vicpt commented on 2021-02-24 17:56 (UTC)

Apparently the problem has nothing to do with the driver. After some debugging I noticed the driver is indeed working, the problem is xorg related.

After a manual configuration of xorg, specifying the driver to use (nvidia) instead of (nv) my graphics are back again.

@graysky the package is ok (probably since -14). Thank you for your time and attention on this package.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 .. 58 Next › Last »