Package Details: nvidia-ck 364.19-3

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-ck.git (read-only)
Package Base: nvidia-ck
Description: NVIDIA drivers for linux-ck.
Upstream URL: http://www.nvidia.com/
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: nvidia-275xx-ck, nvidia-304xx-ck, nvidia-304xx-ck-atom, nvidia-304xx-ck-barcelona, nvidia-304xx-ck-broadwell, nvidia-304xx-ck-core2, nvidia-304xx-ck-corex, nvidia-304xx-ck-haswell, nvidia-304xx-ck-ivybridge, nvidia-304xx-ck-k10, nvidia-304xx-ck-kx, nvidia-304xx-ck-nehalem, nvidia-304xx-ck-p4, nvidia-304xx-ck-pentm, nvidia-304xx-ck-piledriver, nvidia-304xx-ck-sandybridge, nvidia-304xx-ck-silvermont, nvidia-304xx-ck-skylake, nvidia-319-ck, nvidia-340xx-ck, nvidia-340xx-ck-atom, nvidia-340xx-ck-barcelona, nvidia-340xx-ck-broadwell, nvidia-340xx-ck-bulldozer, nvidia-340xx-ck-core2, nvidia-340xx-ck-haswell, nvidia-340xx-ck-ivybridge, nvidia-340xx-ck-k10, nvidia-340xx-ck-kx, nvidia-340xx-ck-nehalem, nvidia-340xx-ck-p4, nvidia-340xx-ck-pentm, nvidia-340xx-ck-piledriver, nvidia-340xx-ck-sandybridge, nvidia-340xx-ck-silvermont, nvidia-340xx-ck-skylake, nvidia-96xx-ck, nvidia-beta-ck, nvidia-ck-atom, nvidia-ck-barcelona, nvidia-ck-broadwell, nvidia-ck-bulldozer, nvidia-ck-core2, nvidia-ck-corex, nvidia-ck-haswell, nvidia-ck-ivybridge, nvidia-ck-k10, nvidia-ck-kx, nvidia-ck-nehalem, nvidia-ck-p4, nvidia-ck-pentm, nvidia-ck-piledriver, nvidia-ck-sandybridge, nvidia-ck-skylake
Submitter: ajk
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 119
Popularity: 0.524970
First Submitted: 2010-01-03 10:48
Last Updated: 2016-05-05 17:29

Latest Comments

graysky commented on 2016-04-24 12:33

@superice - Yep!

SuperIce97 commented on 2016-04-24 00:10

Can you add a DKMS version to this PKGBUILD? It would be nice to just have the module recompile automatically after a kernel update than having to install the new version manually.

EDIT: I actually just discovered that you don't need a dkms for this driver. The normal nvidia-dkms driver will build for this kernel.

petterk commented on 2016-04-14 08:09

:: nvidia-ck-haswell: installing nvidia-utils (364.16-2) breaks dependency 'nvidia-utils=361.28'

FadeMind commented on 2016-02-11 10:19


petterk downgrade nvidia-utils (and lib32-nvidia-utils):
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/48123

petterk commented on 2016-02-11 09:16

After upgrading to 361.28-1:

primus: fatal: failed to load any of the libraries: /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1

03:00.0 3D controller: NVIDIA Corporation GM108M [GeForce 840M] (rev ff) (prog-if ff)
!!! Unknown header type 7f
Kernel modules: nouveau, nvidia

BlondVador commented on 2016-02-03 06:11

nvidia-utils 361.18-2 in extra.

graysky commented on 2016-01-28 16:37

@maleadt - Please try 358.16-2 which was just pushed and report back.

maleadt commented on 2016-01-28 14:30

Why does this package depend on nvidia-libgl? nvidia/extra depends on libgl, allowing me to use mesa-libgl (I'm using the NVIDIA driver purely for computing/CUDA).

shoober420 commented on 2016-01-06 15:44

I'll just edit makepkg to direct to 361.16 until then...

graysky commented on 2016-01-06 13:02

@shoober420 - It's not out of date until a new version of nvidia-utils hits [extra].

Anonymous comment on 2015-11-22 11:32

@graysky it is now. :)

graysky commented on 2015-11-21 12:43

@fademind - not out of date until nvidia-utils 358.16-1 hits [extra].

graysky commented on 2015-11-18 00:26

Ping me when nvidia-utils-358.13 is in [extra].

ahjolinna commented on 2015-11-17 23:50

the 358.13 is now the first stable version in NVIDIA's 358 driver series

zerophase commented on 2015-10-03 05:11

Is this needed for a Linux-ck kernel with Nvidia cards? I'm guessing the standard packages don't work correctly with a ck kernel.

graysky commented on 2015-09-29 07:29

Fixed in 355.11-2

Saren commented on 2015-09-29 04:54

Flagged for build fail.

TomBoshoven commented on 2015-09-28 20:29

Current version does not seem to build correctly:
PKGBUILD: line 40: cd: uvm: No such file or directory

pilarjin commented on 2015-08-31 18:43

This package requires nvidia-libgl, while original nvidia package lets you choose libgl (mesa-libgl, nvidia-libgl, nvidia-304xx-libgl, nvidia-340xx-libgl). Which makes it incompatible with bumblebee(-git). Is it intentional?

Nekroze commented on 2015-08-26 05:04

@graysky - Must have had a tumor that day. I just meant 352.30 and now it is updated it no longer complains that it cannot update nvidia-utils because this required an older version now that they match. Thanks all!

FadeMind commented on 2015-08-21 03:51

Nekroze

nvidia-beta-dkms 355.06-1
https://www.nvidia.com/download/driverResults.aspx/88693/en-us

Just for news.

NOTE: If You want using beta drivers, simply use proper aur package for compiling drivers/nvidia-utils from sources.

Graysky follow Arch stable path in NVIDIA modules releasing.

graysky commented on 2015-08-21 00:07

@Nekroze - No, 352.30 is current in [extra], Not sure what you're talking about.

Nekroze commented on 2015-08-20 22:36

Cannot perform a full system update as nvidia utils has been updated to 355 and this is holding it back. Hopefully its not too much of a pain to bump the version as I would really appreciate it.

graysky commented on 2015-06-23 10:49

I am just mirroring the official nvidia package here for the ck kernel. Since the Arch packagers use these sources, I do too.

KhazAkar commented on 2015-06-23 10:13

Why the x86_64 version is without compat32? What about gaming with Wine/CrossOver?Not all games are 64 bit.

TomBoshoven commented on 2015-05-20 19:03

In case anyone else is experiencing a login issue while downloading the package, replace ftp://download.nvidia.com by http://us.download.nvidia.com in the AUR and it works (at least for me it did).

graysky commented on 2015-05-11 04:43

x89 - This package is not out of date jusr because you are experiencing a problem. 349.16-4 builds against 3.19.7-1-ck for me without that error. Seems like you do not have the correct linux-ck-headers packages on your system.

Naypam commented on 2015-05-11 00:08

https://bpaste.net/show/02b566bd4ee5

Currently getting this while trying to use nvidia-ck with linux-ck. Not sure if this is a temp thing until linux-ck is on 4.0 but either way unless I'm missing something?

skybon commented on 2015-04-22 18:43

nvidia 349.16-1 is out in extra.

graysky commented on 2015-04-21 22:53

Not a problem; wanted to be sure I wasn't missing something.

Buddlespit commented on 2015-04-21 22:20

@graysky, ya, sorry... for some obscure reason, I had it fixed in my head that if I upgraded linux-ck, it would give me the git linux 4.0, which would break nvidia-ck. Obviously not the case... Again, sorry.

graysky commented on 2015-04-18 19:35

@Buddlespit - Why out-of-date?

graysky commented on 2015-04-18 10:00

Thanks nunobaba, fixed in 346.59-2.

nunobaba commented on 2015-04-18 09:55

Still a bug—line 39.

Lompik commented on 2015-04-07 22:23

New bugfix version is out.
s/346.47/346.59/g
md5 db1cebc2a78eac85777bb4c7c2c8c70c for x86_86

Lompik commented on 2015-03-08 02:52

Don't we have to rebuild this module each time a new kernel upgrade is installed ?

graysky commented on 2015-03-01 17:07

So bit it, removed.
Reference: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/43993

FadeMind commented on 2015-03-01 16:18

nv-drm.patch is NOT NEEDED anymore under Linux 3.19 series.
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/nvidia&id=ac3ac26a2cbf8614678ef0109f97196397a019a9

zoopp commented on 2015-01-24 19:41

@graysky: my system upgraded the nvidia packages from the official repo to 346.36 (judging by the content of the links in the post bellow your reply, it looks like the version bump was a mistake?) and during upgrade makepkg kept complaining about missing dependencies.

My bad, I didn't even realize what happened until I started investigating after you replied. Next time I'll pay more attention.

graysky commented on 2015-01-23 10:00

@zoopp - why out of date? I never dropped the drm patch like the official package did. Their -3 is the equalivient of my -1 as far as I can tell.

graysky commented on 2014-11-27 16:47

For nvidia-ck to be in sync with [extra]/nvidia-utils I have to follow the official Arch packages:

https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/log/trunk?h=packages/nvidia
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/log/trunk?h=packages/nvidia-utils

You can experiment on your own, just build the corresponding deps and manually bump this PKGBUILD as you see fit.

TheAifam5 commented on 2014-11-27 16:44

New Release?
ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/346.16/

TheAifam5 commented on 2014-11-27 16:44

New: ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/346.16/

graysky commented on 2014-11-16 16:51

No idea when you throw bumblebee into the mix. Suggest you open a forum thread.

TheAifam5 commented on 2014-11-16 16:43

i have GT-540M.. :/
So im not stupid ;) Befor reinstall my Arch this package worked good :)

so i send some logs..

/usr/lib/modprobe.d/: http://pastebin.com/vcD5azJj
lspci -nnvk | grep -A10 "VGA\|NVIDIA": http://pastebin.com/NdEuU795
Bumblebeed (debug, verbose): http://pastebin.com/ca2QxA9y

graysky commented on 2014-11-16 16:24

Then just install the correct nvidia-340xx-ck from the repo. You should verify which nvidia package you need, there are 3 offered in the repo:
nvidia-ck
nvidia-340xx-ck
nvidia-304xx-ck

I suggested nvidia-340xx-ck thinking that your hardware run under nvidia-ck before.

See: https://www.archlinux.org/news/nvidia-340xx-and-nvidia/

TheAifam5 commented on 2014-11-16 16:16

I using Repo-Ck.

TheAifam5 commented on 2014-11-16 16:16

So... for me not working..
"modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'nvidia': No such device"

I have installed:
- bbswitch-ck (newest)
- nvidia-ck (newest)
- linux-ck (3.17.3-2-ck)

And blacklisted nouveau

graysky commented on 2014-11-16 16:15

If you build this yourself (ie not using the repo package) odds are your hardware is not supported with this driver. Try nvidia-340xx-ck.

TheAifam5 commented on 2014-11-16 16:08

So... for me not working..
"modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'nvidia': No such device"

I have installed:
- bbswitch-ck (newest)
- nvidia-ck (newest)
- linux-ck (3.17.3-2-ck)

VikingGe commented on 2014-11-03 22:01

340.23.03 is a different branch, and GL 4.5 support isn't stable yet. Don't know when we'll get to see support in a stable driver or at least in a more recent beta branch.

Need that as well, actually...

veluria commented on 2014-10-28 16:59

Does your card even support OpenGL 4.5?

prakharsingh95 commented on 2014-10-23 16:30

How to get OpenGL 4.5 suppport? Currently, I have prakhar@sim74stic ~ $ primusrun glxinfo |grep "OpenGL version"
OpenGL version string: 4.4.0 NVIDIA 343.22

https://developer.nvidia.com/opengl-driver says 340.23.03 provides, why don't I get that with 343.22 drivers?

coderkun commented on 2014-10-21 19:42

To which directory do you refer with “build dir”?
nvidia-ck.install is present in the dir where I start makechrootpkg/ccm64 from and using standard makepkg works fine. There are also links in chroot64/<user>/srcdest and chroot64/<user>/startdir.

graysky commented on 2014-10-21 19:12

To my knowledge the arch-scripts use defaults whereas ccm allows you to customize. I don't think that's your problem... is nvdiai-ck.install present in your build dir?

coderkun commented on 2014-10-21 18:41

@graysky: Yes, I was using the arch-build scripts. clean-chroot-manager gives me the same error message. Do these scripts use global config files under /etc (like makepkg.conf) at creation that could load to invalid setup of the chroot?

graysky commented on 2014-10-20 19:19

@coderkun - Yes, builds fine for me. Are you using the arch-build scripts? You can try clean-chroot-manager if you wish. See the following thread for a quick way to add the required linux-ck/linux-ck-headers packages to the local repo in the clean chroot: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1462669#p1462669

coderkun commented on 2014-10-20 14:17

@graysky: Are you building this package in a clean chroot?

For me building in a clean chroot fails with the following error message:
[…]
==> ERROR: install file (nvidia-ck.install) does not exist.
==> ERROR: Build failed, check …

clfarron4 commented on 2014-08-13 16:02

@vic.pozd: I use the system you've proposed with the nvidia packages I maintain, because that's how it was when I received ownership of them and I quite like it.

If you feel it's better the way you suggested, you could quote my nvidia packages as a working example of what you're looking for.

TomBoshoven commented on 2014-07-19 11:24

vic.pozd: It means that he will change it if the maintainers of the regular nvidia package (https://www.archlinux.org/packages/testing/x86_64/nvidia/) change theirs. If you would like it to be changed, get them to do it.

vic.pozd commented on 2014-05-21 22:29

And to think it is not necessary, I gave an example.
Could answer. Or do not want to modify?

graysky commented on 2014-05-21 19:44

This package mirrors the official ARCH package; I don't have a ton of time these days to customize since diffing the official PKGBUILD from my own is preferred.

vic.pozd commented on 2014-05-21 19:07

At your option - downloaded 2 files (for x86 and x86_64). That's not cool.
I propose to make a separate downloads.

....
options=(!strip)
if [ "$CARCH" = "i686" ]; then
source("ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86/${pkgver}/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-${pkgver}.run")
_pkg="NVIDIA-Linux-x86-${pkgver}"
md5sums=('cf8e88e313928eb7a4d6f652ff287717')

elif [ "$CARCH" = "x86_64" ]; then
source=("ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/${pkgver}/NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-${pkgver}-no-compat32.run")
_pkg="NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-${pkgver}-no-compat3"
md5sums=('5f7ed7eab32fa99c72bb2c30d0a85b9d')
fi

prepare() {
....

vic.pozd commented on 2014-05-21 18:53

At your option - downloaded 2 files (for x86 and x86_64). That's not cool.
I propose to make a separate download.

...
options=(!strip)
if [ "$CARCH" = "i686" ]; then
_pkg="NVIDIA-Linux-x86-${pkgver}"
md5sums=('cf8e88e313928eb7a4d6f652ff287717')

elif [ "$CARCH" = "x86_64" ]; then
_pkg="NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-${pkgver}-no-compat3"
md5sums=('5f7ed7eab32fa99c72bb2c30d0a85b9d')
fi

prepare() { ....

graysky commented on 2014-05-20 21:58

Done. Dunno happened.

vic.pozd commented on 2014-05-20 20:14

Pls correct md5sums for x86
cf8e88e313928eb7a4d6f652ff287717 NVIDIA-Linux-x86-337.19.run

astex commented on 2014-05-20 15:43

337.19-1 is out. Flagging as out-of-date.

clfarron4 commented on 2014-05-07 15:47

Looks like 337.19 is coming soon.

graysky commented on 2014-04-16 18:44

@astex - Not out of date; this IS 337.12-2 :p

astex commented on 2014-04-16 16:11

nvidia-utils 337.12-1 has hit [extra]

graysky commented on 2014-04-13 07:14

@talonz - "Comment by graysky
2014-04-12 21:00
Thanks but nvidia-utils-337.12-1 seems to be stuck in [testing] now. Flag it again once it hits [extra]."

graysky commented on 2014-04-12 21:00

Thanks but nvidia-utils-337.12-1 seems to be stuck in [testing] now. Flag it again once it hits [extra].

johanbcn commented on 2014-04-12 20:58

The nvidia and nvidia-utils package are now on version 337.12, so I flagged this as out of date.

graysky commented on 2014-03-06 23:51

... had to patch makepkg to make it easy.

https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-May/023417.html

graysky commented on 2014-03-06 23:49

There... I fixed how the pkgdesc is displayed in the AUR using a .AURINFO file.

graysky commented on 2014-03-06 23:49

There... I fixed how the pkgdesc is displayed in the AUR using a .AURINFO file.

graysky commented on 2014-03-03 22:47

Needed for my repo build script.

Det commented on 2014-03-03 21:54

What's the idea behind the pkgdesc thing?

graysky commented on 2014-02-27 23:53

Bump to v331.49

dhave commented on 2014-02-27 23:13

The package nvidia-utils is now at 331.49, so I flagged nvidia-ck 331.38 as out of date.

graysky commented on 2014-02-20 00:47

As far as I can tell, this is not out of date. Please flag again once the new version of nvidia-utils hits [extra].

ilkyest commented on 2014-01-11 03:16

yeah.. now I could run everything ok... I don't know how... but,kernel stored... hehehehe

ilkyest commented on 2014-01-11 01:48

graysky... I need install this kernel with 300hz, with NUMA and "madvise" hudgepages, and the same but "without numa"

but.. I install the kernel, headers, and nvidia-ck

but X doesn't ups?

I think it were about compiling with many sub-folders, but I'm compiling on home, and the samething

I've compiled three times

the IO Scheduler I let in "no-op"

this are the "pkgbuild" options

[quote]
# Tweak kernel options prior to a build via nconfig
_makenconfig=y

# Running with a 1000 HZ tick rate (vs the ARCH 300) is reported to solve the
# issues with the bfs/linux 3.1x and suspend. For more see:
# http://ck-hack.blogspot.com/2013/09/bfs-0441-311-ck1.html?showComment=1378756529345#c5266548105449573343
_1k_HZ_ticks=

# NUMA is optimized for multi-socket motherboards.
# A single multi-core CPU actually runs slower with NUMA enabled.
# See, https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/31187
_NUMAdisable=

# Compile ONLY probed modules
# As of mainline 2.6.32, running with this option will only build the modules
# that you currently have probed in your system VASTLY reducing the number of
# modules built and the build time to do it.
#
# WARNING - ALL modules must be probed BEFORE you begin making the pkg!
#
# To keep track of which modules are needed for your specific system/hardware,
# give module_db script a try: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41689
# This PKGBUILD will call it directly to probe all the modules you have logged!
#
# More at this wiki page ---> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Modprobed_db
_localmodcfg=

# Use the current kernel's .config file
# Enabling this option will use the .config of the RUNNING kernel rather than
# the ARCH defaults. Useful when the package gets updated and you already went
# through the trouble of customizing your config options. NOT recommended when
# a new kernel is released, but again, convenient for package bumps.
_use_current=

# Alternative I/O scheduler by Paolo.
# Set this if you want it enabled globally i.e. for all devices in your system
# If you want it enabled on a device-by-device basis, leave this unset and see:
# https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck#How_to_Enable_the_BFQ_I.2FO_Scheduler
_BFQ_enable_=
[/quote]

graysky commented on 2014-01-08 20:41

@kriz2 - Not sure what you're talking about... the patch has been removed in the ARCH package as well as in the nvidia-ck pacakge. Check: https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/log/trunk?h=packages/nvidia

kriz2 commented on 2014-01-08 17:27

The nvidia package in extra has been patched to work witk 3.12.6. It fixed a problem with X not finding monitors. Has this been incorporated in this package? I tried to install this along with linux-ck, and had the same issue.

ilkyest commented on 2014-01-06 23:00

I've recompiled the kernel... my hardware only needs o nvidia....

304 don't works very well

I'll retry, and post here the results

graysky commented on 2014-01-06 20:55

Is the nvidia module loaded?

$ lsmod | grep nvidia

If not, manually load it and see if any errors are present in dmesg.

# modprobe nvidia
$ demsg

If could be that your hardware needs nvidia-304xx-ck not nvidia-ck.

ilkyest commented on 2014-01-06 20:16

Graysky... kernel compiled, with headers and kernel... after compiled nvidia-ck

install kernel, headers, than nvidia-ck...

but the X doesn't ups... stay on blank screen....

anything wrong?

graysky commented on 2013-11-16 12:12

@snack - Yes, I had to modify a patch to work with 3.11.8 since 331.20 seems to be a 3.12 native. Try now.

snack commented on 2013-11-16 08:56

nvidia-utils 331.20-1 is now in Arch repos:

$ yaourt -Syu --aur
:: Sincronizzazione dei database in corso...
repo-ck 42,7 KiB 161K/s 00:00 [#######################################################] 100%
core 105,9 KiB 298K/s 00:00 [#######################################################] 100%
extra 1475,0 KiB 339K/s 00:04 [#######################################################] 100%
community 2025,3 KiB 286K/s 00:07 [#######################################################] 100%
multilib 110,8 KiB 180K/s 00:01 [#######################################################] 100%
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: Starting full system upgrade...
:: nvidia-ck-core2: requires nvidia-utils=325.15

graysky commented on 2013-11-07 18:55

Why is this out-of-date? The ARCH package for nvidia-utils is still 325.15.

kiodo1981 commented on 2013-11-07 06:08

New version 331.20 is out

notthesun commented on 2013-08-07 15:06

@graysky so your solution works fine...i've just delete the old module and then reinstall driver...thanks for the help...

notthesun commented on 2013-08-07 14:47

@graysky i've just reboot...give me one minute and i try to remove the old module..

graysky commented on 2013-08-07 13:03

Did u remove the old module and probe the new one? Or just reboot.

notthesun commented on 2013-08-07 11:34

Cannot start X on linux-ck-3.10.5-1 and nvidia-ck-nehalem 325.15-1...works good on standard kernel...
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the NVIDIA kernel module. Please see the
[ 9.717] (EE) NVIDIA(0): system's kernel log for additional error messages and
[ 9.717] (EE) NVIDIA(0): consult the NVIDIA README for details.
[ 9.717] (EE) NVIDIA(0): *** Aborting ***
[ 9.717] (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failing initialization of X screen 0
[ 9.717] (II) UnloadModule: "nvidia"
[ 9.717] (II) UnloadSubModule: "shadow"
[ 9.717] (II) UnloadSubModule: "wfb"
[ 9.717] (II) UnloadSubModule: "fb"
[ 9.717] (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.
[ 9.718] (EE)
Fatal server error:
[ 9.718] (EE) no screens found(EE)
[ 9.718] (EE)
Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support
at http://wiki.x.org
for help.
[ 9.718] (EE) Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.1.log" for additional information.
[ 9.718] (EE)
[ 9.818] (EE) Server terminated with error (1). Closing log file.

Anonymous comment on 2013-08-06 18:27

@Senth

You don't have linux-ck installed. This pkgbuild is for that kernel. Look at linux-ck in the arch wiki

graysky commented on 2013-04-03 20:52

Plz don't flag until the new version hits [extra].

graysky commented on 2013-03-20 09:48

No idea how manjaro works. These are for Arch Linux.

Senth commented on 2013-03-19 20:25

could delete that depence from PKGBUILD? or that's a bad way ?

Senth commented on 2013-03-19 20:23

Hi, i have this error:
==> nvidia-ck dependencies:
- nvidia-utils=313.26 (already installed)
- linux-ck>=3.8 (building from AUR)
- linux-ck<3.9 (building from AUR)
- linux-ck-headers>=3.8 (building from AUR)
- linux-ck-headers<3.9 (building from AUR)


==> Edit nvidia-ck.install ? [Y/n] ("A" to abort)
==> ---------------------------------------------
==> n

==> Continue building nvidia-ck ? [Y/n]
==> -----------------------------------
==>
==> Building and installing package
==> Install or build missing dependencies for nvidia-ck:
error: target not found: linux-ck-headers<3.9
==> Restart building nvidia-ck ? [y/N]
==> ----------------------------------

What can i do? I'm newbie.. i want to learn.. I'm using manjaro linux. I suppose there is no problem. Thanks!

Senth commented on 2013-03-19 20:19

Hi, i have this error:
==> nvidia-ck dependencies:
- nvidia-utils=313.26 (already installed)
- linux-ck>=3.8 (building from AUR)
- linux-ck<3.9 (building from AUR)
- linux-ck-headers>=3.8 (building from AUR)
- linux-ck-headers<3.9 (building from AUR)


==> Edit nvidia-ck.install ? [Y/n] ("A" to abort)
==> ---------------------------------------------
==> n

==> Continue building nvidia-ck ? [Y/n]
==> -----------------------------------
==>
==> Building and installing package
==> Install or build missing dependencies for nvidia-ck:
error: target not found: linux-ck-headers<3.9
==> Restart building nvidia-ck ? [y/N]
==> ----------------------------------

What can i do? I'm newbie.. i want to learn.. I'm using manjaro linux. I suppose there is no problem. Thanks!

Senth commented on 2013-03-19 20:16

Hi, i have this error:
==> nvidia-ck dependencies:
- nvidia-utils=313.26 (already installed)
- linux-ck>=3.8 (building from AUR)
- linux-ck<3.9 (building from AUR)
- linux-ck-headers>=3.8 (building from AUR)
- linux-ck-headers<3.9 (building from AUR)


==> Edit nvidia-ck.install ? [Y/n] ("A" to abort)
==> ---------------------------------------------
==> n

==> Continue building nvidia-ck ? [Y/n]
==> -----------------------------------
==>
==> Building and installing package
==> Install or build missing dependencies for nvidia-ck:
error: target not found: linux-ck-headers<3.9
==> Restart building nvidia-ck ? [y/N]
==> ----------------------------------

I'm newbie.. i want to learn. Thanks!

Anonymous comment on 2013-03-06 19:55

Sorry, flagged it out of date but I see you updated it already.

graysky commented on 2013-02-15 22:40

...why out of date, no updated nvidia-utils in [extra]. Plz flag again once this happens.

Senth commented on 2013-02-12 21:39

then, i686 architecture is not supported ?

Anonymous comment on 2013-02-12 17:37

fixed with ln -s /usr/src/linux-3.7.7-1-ck/include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h /usr/src/linux-3.7.7-1-ck/include/linux/version.h

Anonymous comment on 2013-02-12 15:15

*** Unable to determine the target kernel version. ***

make: *** [select_makefile] Errore 1


Again, with linux-ck 3.7.7 T_T

graysky commented on 2013-02-05 20:03

Updated with no version bump.

vic.pozd commented on 2013-02-05 19:19

pse update md5sums (i686) = 780c37c28a6e06e9571cafe348b7da64
73!

vic.pozd commented on 2013-02-05 19:17

pse update md5sums = 780c37c28a6e06e9571cafe348b7da64
73!

graysky commented on 2013-02-04 18:46

This is true with the official ARCH packages as well.
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/33710
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/33711

PerfectGentleman commented on 2013-02-04 18:06

3.7.6-1-ck
--
*** Unable to determine the target kernel version. ***

make: *** [select_makefile] Error 1
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build()
--

PerfectGentleman commented on 2013-02-04 15:11

*** Unable to determine the target kernel version. ***
make: *** [select_makefile] Error 1

with 3.7.6-1-ck

PerfectGentleman commented on 2013-02-04 15:08

*** Unable to determine the target kernel version. ***
make: *** [select_makefile] Error 1

with 3.7.6-1-ck

graysky commented on 2013-01-25 16:22

Bump to v313.18-1

Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/nvidia-ck?id=c577494c48aaeb1b0bda34f6e83b35f820690a68

graysky commented on 2013-01-25 16:05

Bump to v313.18-1

Commit:

graysky commented on 2013-01-25 15:57

Bump to v310.32-1

Youpi commented on 2013-01-25 08:56

new version is 310.32

graysky commented on 2013-01-19 13:45

Why out-of-date? Yes, upstream has released a new version but the Arch deps (nivida-utils) is not updated.

graysky commented on 2012-11-21 23:28

Bump to v310.19-3

Changelog: Updated conflicts array for better AUR/repo support.

graysky commented on 2012-11-16 23:04

Bump to v310.19-2

Note for users of GeForce 6 and 7 series. Starting with release of the 310 series, NVIDIA’s minimum supported hardware will be the GeForce 8 series. You will therefor need to use the nvidia-304xx-ck series of drivers located here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nvidia-304xx-ck

graysky commented on 2012-11-16 22:00

Bump to v310.19-1

NOTE that this driver will not work with some older nvidia products! In that case, you MUST use the nvidia-304xx-ck driver package located here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nvidia-304xx-ck

graysky commented on 2012-11-16 21:47

BUmp to v310.19-1

graysky commented on 2012-11-06 23:10

Bump to v304.64-1

mrbit commented on 2012-11-06 22:39

please update nvidia 304.64 thanks

coderkun commented on 2012-11-02 11:01

@graysky: sorry, nvidia-settings is part of nvidia-utils

https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/32117

coderkun commented on 2012-11-02 10:59

@graysky: sorry, nvidia-settings is part of nvidia-utils

https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/32117?project=1&cat[0]=2&string=nvidia-utils

coderkun commented on 2012-11-02 10:52

@graysky: Strange, I get this error message running nvidia-settings when pangox-compat is not installed:
“nvidia-settings: error while loading shared libraries: libpangox-1.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory”

Any idea?

graysky commented on 2012-11-01 20:16

@coderkun - It should not. The nvidia-ck package is more is less identical to nvidia in [extra] which does not depend on that.

coderkun commented on 2012-11-01 11:55

Is it correct, that nvidia-ck needs libpangox (provided by pangox-compat [extra])?
Should then be added as dependency.

graysky commented on 2012-10-23 01:31

Bump to v304.60-2

Changelog: Rebuilt against 3.6.3-2 and bumped to keep AUR in sycn with repo.
Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/nvidia-ck?id=785c07c746c5896e95e9d04757d59f4b190e0566

graysky commented on 2012-10-21 22:07

Bump to v304.60-1

Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/nvidia-ck?id=3c53bc4300d74c5cb91b590037c33216551a1107

graysky commented on 2012-10-20 12:16

Bump to v304.60-1

Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/nvidia-ck?id=3c53bc4300d74c5cb91b590037c33216551a1107

graysky commented on 2012-10-03 20:51

Bump to v304.51-2

Changelog: Rebuild against linux-ck 3.5.5-1 and bumped in the AUR to keep repo-ck users in sync with the AUR.
Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/nvidia-ck?id=f0b865eedb97b10ba28a39d2de81f749edc48808

graysky commented on 2012-09-26 19:04

@vic- done and thanks.

vic.pozd commented on 2012-09-26 18:47

pse correct md5sum in i686 arch - 4fde294e139a31528ea7f6efd8885a09

graysky commented on 2012-09-24 18:54

@tuborg - No problem. I actually no longer have an nvidia card since upgrading to an i7 chip. Please flag this out-of-date when the new version of nvidia-utils hits [extra] so I can update.

tuborg commented on 2012-09-24 18:50

Oh sorry about that. Just happened to be at the nvidia driver page and noticed a new release from today. You're usually very on top of things so I should've known better. :) Thanks for the all the work you do.

graysky commented on 2012-09-24 18:03

@tuborg - Not out of date until nvidia-utils xxx hits extra. Right now, nvidia-utils is 304.43: http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/nvidia-utils/

graysky commented on 2012-08-19 12:27

Bump to v304.37-3

Changelog: Rebuild against linux-ck 3.5.2-2.
Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/nvidia-ck?id=7311828d1358de95fd77ea5ec1255f6f5629fa51

graysky commented on 2012-08-16 20:09

Bump to v304.37-2

Changelog: Update for new kernel version.
Committ: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/nvidia-ck?id=8ff60963c7fcbe5f32e4e7f85e619c4d0c6fcb77

graysky commented on 2012-07-14 14:17

Bump to v302.17-2

Changelog: Package compliant with new Arch standards of lib --> usr/lib so read http://www.archlinux.org/news/the-lib-directory-becomes-a-symlink and never force an update.
Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/nvidia-ck?id=3972cf7a45e931e9e03ac84665d4a536c455004d

graysky commented on 2012-06-21 06:01

Bump to v302.17-1

Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/nvidia-ck?id=e2fcf21d19b1d24fb6b8bfec619d18d78cc5e124

felixonmars commented on 2012-06-17 13:47

@graysky
The original FTP removed the file, and I asked about this earlier: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=143476
But anyway, the US repo is ok so you may wanna git it a try instead of the Russian one :P

graysky commented on 2012-06-17 12:24

Why would anyone want to download the installer source and from that Russian mirror to boot?

dante4d commented on 2012-06-17 11:50

If you want to build package for the 302.17 driver, look here: ru.download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/302.17/NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-302.17.run

graysky commented on 2012-06-17 01:10

Sorry guys, I cannot update the pkg until later in the week. No coax from my house to the cable box = no connection :(

Anonymous comment on 2012-06-12 01:12

Never mind, I got it taken care of...had to reboot because the tmp was full. Then it installed like a charm :) The only quirk was that I had to reinstall awesomewm for it to display and not go back to the console.

graysky commented on 2012-06-12 00:55

Looks like an archive error... Passed md5sum but invalid??? Delete it and redownload maybe?

Anonymous comment on 2012-06-12 00:46

I was able to get nvidia-ck to start building but, now I have a new problem while starting the build.
==> Starting build()...
Creating directory NVIDIA-Linux-x86-295.53
Verifying archive integrity... OK
Uncompressing NVIDIA Accelerated Graphics Driver for Linux-x86 295.53........................................................................................................................................Extraction failed.
Terminated
..
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build nvidia-ck.

graysky commented on 2012-06-11 22:56

Hmm.. Works for me. Can u post some details?

Anonymous comment on 2012-06-11 18:44

This package will not install after building linux-ck 3.4.2-1.

graysky commented on 2012-06-02 12:33

Bump to 295.53-2

Changelog: updated to work w/ 3.4.0-1 kernel
Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/nvidia-ck

graysky commented on 2012-05-16 22:57

Bump to 295.53-1

PKG Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/nvidia-ck?id=8478e4a350dfe0878338d0160d4ddf59070ff76d

graysky commented on 2012-05-16 22:55

Yeah, typo. One of the vim side effects with me. Fixed and thanks.

Anonymous comment on 2012-04-11 23:04

md5sums=('0bc1561b405443c6d1331934093137fd')i <-- Typo, right?

graysky commented on 2012-04-11 20:05

Bump to 295.40-1

Comments: You're welcome. Thanks to karabaja4 for flagging OOD.
PKG Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/nvidia-ck?id=2568722ae73e1e3aafcafdb84803b2f6fe817cfd

Anonymous comment on 2012-04-11 19:43

Thanks for the quick update.

Anonymous comment on 2012-04-11 19:43

Thanks for the quick update.

graysky commented on 2012-04-07 09:02

Bump to 295.33-2
PKG Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/nvidia-ck?id=bf83a39c4b1a0fddda62cd062dda390457d21173
Comments: sorry about that - it's fixed now. What went wrong? Nvidia-ck-295.33-1 required linux-ck>=3.2. When I updated nvidia-ck to work with 3.3 I neglected to bump the pkgver from 1 to 2.

kalpik commented on 2012-04-07 06:45

Hi graysky, Can you please update nvidia-ck-corex to install with linux-ck-corex 3.3?

graysky commented on 2012-04-03 08:26

No problem, glad you got it sorted out... and that it wasn't my stuff's fault :p

solstice commented on 2012-04-03 07:42

@graysky: ah yes you're right; I used first linux-ck-kx and nvidia-ck-kx and later linux-ck and nvidia-ck.
ah I think I know why. it's because I used a own-made script to switch back and forth between nvidia and nouveau and
with ck kernel, i must have forgot to regenerate initrd with mkinitcpio (to remove nouveau from initrd)
so the driver nouveau was loaded in the initrd. that's why it failed.
sorry.

graysky commented on 2012-04-02 21:13

@solstice - This package does in fact blacklist the offending module. See line 46 of the PKGBUILD.
Which linux-ck package from the repo are you using (generic, corex, etc.) and for which arch?

solstice commented on 2012-04-02 18:14

when using linux-ck and nvidia-ck from [repo-ck], X does not start
when trying to modprobe manually nvidia module, I got the error: "Can't insert nvidia: No such device" !
/var/log/messages shows a message about other module like rivafb or nvidiafb holding the device. but they are not loaded
in fact, it is nouveau driver that is loaded ! preventing me to use nvidia module

Why don't you have a file /lib/modprobe.d/nvidia.conf to blacklist the nouveau driver has in the nvidia package of archlinux ?
Why am I the only one that such a thing seems to bother and prevent to run nvidia on linux-ck ????

graysky commented on 2012-03-24 01:21

Bump to 295.33-1
PKG Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/nvidia-ck?id=bdae3530bf24b2fd1d01eb72da86a3f5f3f35605

akspecs commented on 2012-03-23 20:29

Here's what worked for me as an md5sum for i686

md5sums=('1634fb3115526caeae5eb8227282bf17')

If you're also in dire need of an updated nvidia-ck driver, manually update the PKGBUILDs pkgver to pkgver=295.33, and then just run :
$ 'makepkg --skipinteg'

akspecs commented on 2012-03-23 20:28

Here's what worked for me as an md5sum for i686

md5sums=('1634fb3115526caeae5eb8227282bf17')

If you're also in dire need of an updated nvidia-ck driver, manually update the PKGBUILDs pkgver to pkgver=295.33, and then just run 'makepkg --skipinteg'

Anonymous comment on 2012-03-23 16:24

Request Bump to 295.33
--
md5sums=('04e814843bcaf23efa0b4b3df4ea2700')
--

graysky commented on 2012-03-12 21:46

Bump to 295.20-4
Had to rebuild against 3.2.10-1 or else this module didn't work.

graysky commented on 2012-03-01 21:11

Bump to 295.20-3
Had to rebuild against 3.2.9-1 or else this module didn't work.

graysky commented on 2012-02-28 00:22

Bump to 295.20-2
Had to rebuild against 3.2.8-1 or else this module didn't work.

leafonsword commented on 2012-02-07 13:22

graysky commented on 2012-01-17 00:16

Bump to 290.10-3
Had to rebuild against 3.2.1-3 or else this module didn't work.

graysky commented on 2012-01-05 22:12

Updated to work with the 3.2 tree.

Anonymous comment on 2011-11-26 23:00

Hi,

Yes it builds, I'm on my desktop right now using linux-ck with nvidia-ck, I'm assuming that if I have nvidia installed then I need to have nvidia-ck in order for my desktop to work, correct?

Well it seems to be fine then...


THANKS

graysky commented on 2011-11-23 10:26

Wait... Does the nvidia-ck package build a module for you? The warning you pasted is part of the build process, ie from upstream. It is normal. As long as you have a working package and module, you are fine.

Anonymous comment on 2011-11-23 02:43

Hi graysky,

I have Arch backed up on an image so I resinstalled the linux-ck & headers.

I also updated Arch so I now have the latest Nvidia;

nvidia-290.10-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz
nvidia-utils-290.10-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz

And in the PKGBUILD for linux-ck this is all I changed and then ran makepkg -s and installed the pkgs


_usearchlogo="y" # use the blue Arch logo rather than default tux logo when booting
_makenconfig="n" # select additional kernel options prior to a build via nconfig
_localmodcfg="n" # compile ONLY probed modules - see notes below!
_localyescfg="n" # convert all modules to core - see notes below!
_use_current="n" # use the current kernel's .config file - see notes below!
_BFQ_enable_="y" # enable BFQ as the default I/O scheduler

I still see the message but the package gets made;

nvidia-ck-290.10-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz

So I installed it and I'm typing sitting here with linux-ck booted and everything working, so I don't know why this message keeps appearing.

According to info online this has to do with the headers so hopefully you can figure it out...


THANKS

graysky commented on 2011-11-23 00:48

Days fox - try now? No idea what's wrong with your setup.

graysky commented on 2011-11-22 12:23

Will update shortly

student975 commented on 2011-11-22 12:06

nvidia-utils 290.10-1 is in official repo.

Anonymous comment on 2011-11-22 05:04

With linux-ck & headers installed, these are my packages;

linux-ck-3.1.1-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz
linux-ck-headers-3.1.1-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz

When I try to install nvidia-ck I get this message below;


test -e include/generated/autoconf.h -a -e include/config/auto.conf || ( \
echo; \
echo " ERROR: Kernel configuration is invalid."; \
echo " include/generated/autoconf.h or include/config/auto.conf are missing.";\
echo " Run 'make oldconfig && make prepare' on kernel src to fix it."; \
echo; \


What seems to be the problem, why am I getting this and how can I fix this?


THANKS

Anonymous comment on 2011-11-09 23:25

Looks good so far. Thank you.

graysky commented on 2011-11-09 22:31

@mond - OK... I believe I tracked the problem down and corrected it. I type this now booted into the corex package set and previously into the generic set. I just pushed the -6 release of nvidia-ck-xxx series for both arches. Please pacman -Syu and let me know if the problem is corrected on your systems as well. As with any nvidia upgrade, you'll need to either reboot your system or drop down to runlevel 3, rmmod nvidia then come back to runlevel 5.

Please let me know if all is well with the -6 release.

graysky commented on 2011-11-09 12:08

Am aware of the problem, thx

Anonymous comment on 2011-11-09 10:55

Hello graysky,
I can't load the nvidia-ck-kx module from the repo since the last kernelupdate due to a symbol missmatch.
Could you please rebuild this package? Thanks.

graysky commented on 2011-11-05 19:55

I bumped to allow a clean update for repo users while I combined some packages. AUR users have no reason to update.

graysky commented on 2011-10-12 20:06

Bump to -2 only to fix a few deps issues with some repo packages. -2 is identical to -1 for AUR users and there is no need to upgrade.

graysky commented on 2011-10-12 00:03

Updated to latest version.

graysky commented on 2011-08-20 10:24

Pacman 3.5.4-4 just hit [core] and included a significant change to the CFLAGS. I am simply bumping to compile again with these new flags for the repo. AUR users should recompile after updated their systems AND modifying their /etc/makepkg.conf incorporating the changes in /etc/makepkg.conf.pacnew first!

graysky commented on 2011-08-19 01:16

Bump to match the repo package ver number - AUR users have no reason to update.

xyproto commented on 2011-08-18 11:07

I've had problems with X crashing with 280 but not with 275.

graysky commented on 2011-08-10 08:34

@cec - yeah, since I retooled my build script and the nvidia-ck package to work with linux-ck, I haven't gone back to rebuild all the nvidia-ck packages to work with kernel26-ck. You can build it manually from the repo if you want/need features in 280.13. Meanwhile, CK should be back in town this week.

Anonymous comment on 2011-08-10 01:19

Is nvidia-ck-pentm updated to 280.13? It seems the repo is still at 275.21?

xyproto commented on 2011-08-03 17:18

graysky, I see. Thank you for the comment.

xyproto commented on 2011-08-03 17:18

graysky, I see. Thanks you for the comment.

graysky commented on 2011-07-30 21:46

@tron - problem is that linux-ck isn't ready yet due to upstream:

1) CK hasn't started to work on the patch set for the 3.x series yet (read my comment on the linux-ck AUR page).
2) Paolo hasn't released a BFQ patch that works with the 3.x series yet.

I can't update this package, nor can I update lirc-ck until linux-ck goes gold. Leaving it as such allows folks building the soon-to-be-depreciated kernel26-ck package to have an nvidia driver.

Zom commented on 2011-07-30 21:06

@trontonic: Read the comments for that particular package. Also note the maintainer for this package and the linux-ck package.

xyproto commented on 2011-07-30 20:24

linux-ck 3.0 is out.

graysky commented on 2011-07-22 15:09

Updated to 275.21-1

graysky commented on 2011-07-17 20:46

Thanks for keeping an eye out, but there is no source for 275.19 on upstream's FTP any more... technically this package isn't out of date.

ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/

graysky commented on 2011-07-14 19:53

Bump to 275.09.07-3

The is a very minor fix for the dependency issue that xclaude raised in the forum post about the repo. I slightly modified the PKGBUILD as a result (along with fixes to my build script). Anyway, I "updated" to this revision only for consistency's sake, i.e. to make this PKG match the ones I am building now for the repo.

There is no need for AUR users to update unless you like building packages :p

graysky commented on 2011-06-11 18:45

Bump to 2.6.39.1-4

-3 users have NO reason to update. I had to bump to because I added an additional arch to the repo (k10 optimized) and the only way I would make sure that all packages got update to their respective conflicts arrays was to rebuild EVERYTHING. Repo users will get the update but AUR users have no reason to build/update unless you like to watch packages compile :)

graysky commented on 2011-05-20 23:05

It's not noise. Certainly, if you're building nvidia-ck you will get this. The only time you won't is when all the packages (nvidia-utils and nvidia-ck) are queued up in a single batch like when pulled from a repo.

student975 commented on 2011-05-20 21:16

@graysky

The thing is, I don't use the repo, but AUR, and yaourt seems to be confused with such kind of update. I have removed nvidia-ck, updated all system and installed nvidia-ck. All is OK, thanks!

Sorry for noise.

graysky commented on 2011-05-20 20:49

:confused:

I just updated a number of systems with the repo enabled. For example:

[2011-05-20 16:28] Running 'pacman-color -Syu'
[2011-05-20 16:28] synchronizing package lists
[2011-05-20 16:28] starting full system upgrade
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded attr (2.4.44-3 -> 2.4.46-1)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded acl (2.2.49-2 -> 2.2.51-1)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded binutils (2.21-7 -> 2.21-8)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded udev (168-1 -> 168-2)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded device-mapper (2.02.84-1 -> 2.02.85-1)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded cryptsetup (1.2.0-1 -> 1.3.0-1)
[2011-05-20 16:31] installed libssh2 (1.2.7-2)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded curl (7.21.6-1 -> 7.21.6-2)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded file (5.07-1 -> 5.07-3)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded gcc (4.6.0-4 -> 4.6.0-5)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded gcc-libs (4.6.0-4 -> 4.6.0-5)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded gmp (5.0.1-2 -> 5.0.2-1)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded grep (2.7-1 -> 2.8-1)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded htop (0.9-1 -> 0.9-2)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded mkinitcpio (0.6.11-1 -> 0.6.12-1)
[2011-05-20 16:31] >>> Updating module dependencies. Please wait ...
[2011-05-20 16:31] >>> MKINITCPIO SETUP
[2011-05-20 16:31] >>> ----------------
[2011-05-20 16:31] >>> If you use LVM2, Encrypted root or software RAID,
[2011-05-20 16:31] >>> Ensure you enable support in /etc/mkinitcpio.conf .
[2011-05-20 16:31] >>> More information about mkinitcpio setup can be found here:
[2011-05-20 16:31] >>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Mkinitcpio
[2011-05-20 16:31]
[2011-05-20 16:31] >>> Generating initial ramdisk, using mkinitcpio. Please wait...
[2011-05-20 16:31] ==> Building image "default"
[2011-05-20 16:31] ==> Running command: /sbin/mkinitcpio -k 2.6.39-ck -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/kernel26-ck.img
[2011-05-20 16:31] :: Begin build
[2011-05-20 16:31] :: Parsing hook [base]
[2011-05-20 16:31] :: Parsing hook [udev]
[2011-05-20 16:31] :: Parsing hook [sata]
[2011-05-20 16:31] :: Parsing hook [filesystems]
[2011-05-20 16:31] :: Generating module dependencies
[2011-05-20 16:31] :: Generating image '/boot/kernel26-ck.img'...SUCCESS
[2011-05-20 16:31] ==> SUCCESS
[2011-05-20 16:31] ==> Building image "fallback"
[2011-05-20 16:31] ==> Running command: /sbin/mkinitcpio -k 2.6.39-ck -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/kernel26-ck-fallback.img -S autodetect
[2011-05-20 16:31] :: Begin build
[2011-05-20 16:31] :: Parsing hook [base]
[2011-05-20 16:31] :: Parsing hook [udev]
[2011-05-20 16:31] :: Parsing hook [sata]
[2011-05-20 16:31] :: Parsing hook [filesystems]
[2011-05-20 16:31] :: Generating module dependencies
[2011-05-20 16:31] :: Generating image '/boot/kernel26-ck-fallback.img'...SUCCESS
[2011-05-20 16:31] ==> SUCCESS
[2011-05-20 16:31] Changelog for new kernel release at http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_39
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded kernel26-ck-k7 (2.6.38.6-3 -> 2.6.39-1)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded libgssglue (0.1-3 -> 0.1-4)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded libxfce4util (4.8.1-1 -> 4.8.1-2)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded libxfce4ui (4.8.0-1 -> 4.8.0-3)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded libxfcegui4 (4.8.1-2 -> 4.8.1-3)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded lvm2 (2.02.84-1 -> 2.02.85-1)
[2011-05-20 16:31] upgraded lzo2 (2.04-1 -> 2.05-1)
[2011-05-20 16:32] upgraded nvidia-utils (270.41.06-1 -> 270.41.19-1)
[2011-05-20 16:32] ERROR: Module nvidia is in use
[2011-05-20 16:32] In order to use the new nvidia module, exit Xserver and unload it manually.
[2011-05-20 16:32] upgraded nvidia-ck-k7 (270.41.06-1 -> 270.41.19-1)
[2011-05-20 16:32] upgraded perl-datetime (0.69-2 -> 0.70-1)
[2011-05-20 16:32] upgraded rsync (3.0.8-1 -> 3.0.8-2)

graysky commented on 2011-05-20 20:39

:confused:

student975 commented on 2011-05-20 20:25

270.41.19 is in extra:

:: Starting full system upgrade...
:: nvidia-ck: requires nvidia-utils=270.41.06

graysky commented on 2011-04-20 21:12

Thanks, now it's here :)

student975 commented on 2011-04-20 19:17

nvidia-utils 270.41.06-1 is in extra.

graysky commented on 2011-04-16 10:57

Bumped as a fix for an error I introduced affecting the repo packages. There is no difference between -1 and -2.

Anonymous comment on 2011-04-11 21:44

nvidia 270.41.03-1 is in [extra]

graysky commented on 2011-03-26 13:13

What Zom said... wish pacman could resolve that dep issue on its own.

Zom commented on 2011-03-26 12:41

Remove nvidia-ck, update nvidia-utils, install nvidia-ck.

student975 commented on 2011-03-26 10:53

I can not install new nvidia-utils because currently installed nvidia-ck wants old nvidia-utils. I can not reinstall nvidia-ck because it wants new nvidia-utils. I can not remove any package because nvidia-ck depends on nvidia-utils, and plenty apss depends on libgl (i.e. on nvidia-ck). What is legal AL way to resolve the issue?

graysky commented on 2011-03-26 10:28

Since nvidia-utils 270.30-1 is in [extra], adjusted to match.

JokerBoy commented on 2011-03-25 21:22

nvidia 270.30 is there for xorg-server 1.10.0-1.

student975 commented on 2011-03-25 21:21

graysky, got it, thanks!

[OT] In fact, I have decided to install some additional kernel with the aim to have at least two kernels in grub menu - as far as AL still hasn't kernel multiversioning. Among all kernels ck is the most obvious choice :-) Have not found any drawbacks, and DE resposivity is noticeably higher. Thanks!

BTW, probably I have missed those arguments for BFQ to be commented out in the PKGBUILD by default. Too new kernel?

graysky commented on 2011-03-25 20:23

@student - sorry, most of the peeps here want to use the latest version even if it's in [testing]. In this case though, I have no idea why 270.30 is in testing since the official nvidia release is still 260.19.44. I don't even see 270.30 advertised as a beta on nvidia.com and finally, 270.30 sucks on several of my machines. nvidia-smi is broken and there is a noticeable performance regression. I have adjusted this pkg back to the 260.19.44 series until the 270.x is stable.

student975 commented on 2011-03-25 13:35

JokerBoy, being too new with Arch, I'd want still to avoid [testing] using. Currently I have downloaded nvidia-utils package referenced by graysky in kernel26-ck-related forum thread.

https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=111715&p=7

message #161. At any case I think it is some kind of inconsistency in AUR: last one is supposed to be "self-contained". Am I wrong?

JokerBoy commented on 2011-03-25 09:57

student975 - take it from [testing].

student975 commented on 2011-03-25 03:23

nvidia-utils=270.30 is an unsatisfied dependency. OTOH, AUR has nvidia-utils-beta=270.30.

graysky commented on 2011-03-18 21:35

Updated to 270.30-1 now so the point is mute. Please report problems as usual.

graysky commented on 2011-03-18 20:22

@Luco - not sure what is wrong. It had an error the right after I uploaded it but I have rebuilt and reuploaded. Have you resync'ed?

pacman -Syy
pacman -S nvidia

Anonymous comment on 2011-03-18 09:32

I'm using nvidia-ck-core2 from your repository... nvidia module exists but I cannot load it using /sbin/modprobe.

I had to work around this by inserting in rc.local:
“/bin/zcat /lib/modules/$(/bin/uname -r)/kernel/drivers/video/nvidia.ko.gz | /sbin/insmod -”

graysky commented on 2011-02-15 22:34

@JB - done - thx for the suggestion.

JokerBoy commented on 2011-02-14 14:28

please add "gzip -9 $pkgdir/lib/modules/${_kernver}/kernel/drivers/video/nvidia.ko" in package()

you know why. :P

graysky commented on 2011-01-22 12:03

Updated to 2.6.36

artemklevtsov commented on 2011-01-22 10:32

PKGBUILD for 260.19.36 - http://aur.pastebin.com/nHMgs7ME

graysky commented on 2011-01-07 22:22

Updated for 2.6.37-ck

Svenw commented on 2010-12-17 21:44

Ahhh, disregard .. I see that the kernel-ck-headers package *should* be built alongside the kernel-ck package; I use clyde to build AUR packages and apparently it fails to install both packages.

Svenw commented on 2010-12-17 20:07

I appears as though the required kernel-ck-headers package is no longer in AUR? This package now fails to build.

Svenw commented on 2010-12-17 19:54

the makedepends in the PKGBUILD file calls for kernel26-ck-headers ... the package for which does not exist ... it would appear that the kernel26-ck package already installs the needed headers.

graysky commented on 2010-12-16 05:58

@JB - ok, that sounds reasonable. I made the change but didn't bump the pkgrel. Thanks for the suggestion.

JokerBoy commented on 2010-12-16 00:51

that file already exists in nvidia from extra, so if you have nvidia and you want to install nvidia-ck they will conflict. but if you change that line like i said they will not conflict anymore.

from my guess, that file is just blacklisting the nouveau driver in order to use the nvidia driver.

graysky commented on 2010-12-15 20:04

@JB - I can make the change... is there a corresponding package for nouveau that expects /etc/modprobe.d/nouveau_blacklist_ck.conf? I haven't used nouveau before.

JokerBoy commented on 2010-12-15 19:50

-echo "blacklist nouveau" >> $pkgdir/etc/modprobe.d/nouveau_blacklist.conf
+echo "blacklist nouveau" >> $pkgdir/etc/modprobe.d/nouveau_blacklist_ck.conf

graysky commented on 2010-12-14 14:52

http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages?op=revision&rev=103019

ibiru -- 1 file(s) modified
upgpkg: nvidia 260.19.29-1
update to 260.19.29
~ /nvidia/trunk/PKGBUILD

graysky commented on 2010-12-13 11:04

@d4rch - it doesn't conflict with nvidia since that is for another kernel. The install file is the same one that the official nvidia package uses; not sure what you mean about the FATAL error you're talking about.

Anonymous comment on 2010-12-13 10:12

I have 2 suggestions:

1) Add 'nvidia' to the "conflicts" list.
2) Add 'mkinitcpio -p' to the 'package' function in your PKGBUILD file or in the 'post_install' function in your 'install' file (This solve the "FATAL: nvidia module not found" error).

Cheers :)

lynix commented on 2010-12-09 15:25

Would be very nice to have provides=('nvidia=$pkgver-$pkgrel') for applications that rely on it (e.g. conky-nvidia) :)

zebulon commented on 2010-11-24 07:36

Indeed, I was assuming that kernel installs were readjusting grub, but this is not the case, and as you point out, it is probably better this way. Thanks a lot.

graysky commented on 2010-11-23 21:54

@zebulon - right, a good package won't touch a file it doesn't own. In this case your /boot/grub/menu.lst which you need to edit manually.

zebulon commented on 2010-11-22 20:36

OK, it is my fault, and it explains why nvidia was still working. Now I have:
Linux arch 2.6.36-ck #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Nov 21 21:46:25 GMT 2010 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

Sorry for the fuss. So far I have not noticed a big difference with standard kernel, but maybe I will when I overload my machine.

zebulon commented on 2010-11-22 20:30

OK, it seems the ck kernel does not add itself inot the grub menu, does it?

zebulon commented on 2010-11-22 20:28

I get:
Linux arch 2.6.36-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Oct 31 09:29:11 CET 2010 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

it is not the ck version? Install and mkinitrd seemed to be performed correctly. Furthermore kernel26-ck is listed as instaled by pacman. I have only one entry in Grub. What could have gone wrong?

zebulon commented on 2010-11-22 20:27

I get:
Linux arch 2.6.36-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Oct 31 09:29:11 CET 2010 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

it is not the ck version? Install and mkinitrd seemed to be performed correctly. I have only one entry in Grub. What could have gone wrong?

zebulon commented on 2010-11-22 20:26

I get:
Linux arch 2.6.36-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Oct 31 09:29:11 CET 2010 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

it is not the ck version? Install and mkinitrd seemed to be performed correctly. I have only one entry in Grub. What could have gone wrong?

graysky commented on 2010-11-22 20:10

Hmm.. on mine it reads 2.6.36-ck

zebulon commented on 2010-11-22 13:52

I checked this, I got 2.6.36 (I am at work, I will paste the exact output). And pacman -Qm | grep ^kernel only returns
kernel26-ck 2.6.36-9
kernel26-ck-headers 2.6.36-9

graysky commented on 2010-11-22 07:58

...you sure you've booted into the kernel26-ck??

What is the output of: uname -r

zebulon commented on 2010-11-22 07:57

Unfortunately, I just installed nvidia-ck, so I get:

kernel26-ck 2.6.36-9
kernel26-ck-headers 2.6.36-9
nvidia-ck 260.19.21-2

but the nvidia proprietary driver was working without recompiling or reinstalling nvidia package. I am surprised too!

graysky commented on 2010-11-22 07:14

This package looks for the kernel26-ck-headers and uses them to compile its own nvidia.ko - I can't understand how you're entering X with the distro's nvidia driver. Post the output of pacman -Qm | grep ck

zebulon commented on 2010-11-22 07:11

Hi, thanks for this package. I have a question though: is it necessary after installing kernel26-ck? I have recently installed kernel26-ck over a x86_64 system with "classic kernel" and nvidia proprietary driver. Although I did not yet install nvidia-ck, I still got nvidia-accelerated 3D, to my surprise. So what is the difference between nvidia and nvidia-ck? Thanks in advance.

Syco commented on 2010-11-21 04:40

hello, is there a PKGBUILD for version 256.53? thanks

graysky commented on 2010-11-12 22:09

@barthalion - The kernel26-ck package is now a split package providing both kernel26-ck and kernel26-ck-headers. Please change the makedepds to:
makedepends=('kernel26-ck-headers>=2.6.36' 'kernel26-ck-headers<2.6.37')

JokerBoy commented on 2010-11-12 13:09

you should let somebody else maintain this package :)

Barthalion commented on 2010-11-12 13:01

Ok, updated. Check md5sums for i686.

ajk commented on 2010-11-12 10:34

Guys I'm sorry, I don't have that much time anymore to maintain this package.. I wil orphan it so you guys can adopt it!

graysky commented on 2010-11-11 21:55

260.19.21 is in [testing] now (stable)

graysky commented on 2010-11-11 21:55

@ajk - if you're able to maintain this package, can you orphan it and allow someone else the chance to keep it up-to-date?

graysky commented on 2010-11-04 21:52

The kernel26-ck package is now a split package providing both kernel26-ck and kernel26-ck-headers. Please change the makedepds to:
makedepends=('kernel26-ck-headers>=2.6.36' 'kernel26-ck-headers<2.6.37')

dhave commented on 2010-10-14 12:49

Meanwhile, I had good result with this AUR package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41564.

ajk commented on 2010-10-08 23:04

I am alive guys :)

Past weeks I've been very busy so probably in the comming weeks I'll update the package.. Hang in there!

SanskritFritz commented on 2010-10-05 21:26

@graysky Simply use the nvidia-all or the nvidia-beta-all packages.

graysky commented on 2010-10-05 21:16

You alive, ajk?

hokasch commented on 2010-09-21 07:47

You can always post the PKGBUILD in a pastebin (see some posts down for a current 256.53 PKGBUILD). If you want to take over the package, write ajk an email.

Primoz commented on 2010-09-20 22:59

Hey why is this still outdated? Just wondering because I've built the package using ABS and could upload it..

hokasch commented on 2010-09-04 04:02

P.S.: of course it will compile just fine either way (since kernel26-ck provides headers), right now it is just "cosmetic" - but nvidia-ck should depend on kernel26-ck-headers, not on kernel26-headers. it makes a difference if stock arch kernel26 is older than kernel26-ck.

hokasch commented on 2010-09-04 03:54

@gravsky
did you read my comment?

>Note that it depends on kernel26-ck-headers instead of kernel26-headers, if you haven't fixed the kernel26-ck PKGBUILD to include version number you might wanna change it to >depend on kernel26-headers or run -d.

the kernel26-ck pkgbuild yourself posted (thanks btw!) provides kernel26-ck-headers but doesnt list the version -- please see my earlier comment here and at the kernel26-ck aur page.

graysky commented on 2010-09-03 20:52

@hokasch - you have kernel26-ck-headers in your makedepends array... is there such a package? I commented out that entire line and the package compiled/install just fine.

graysky commented on 2010-09-03 20:50

@hokasch - you have kernel26-ck-headers in your makedepends array... is there such a package?

hokasch commented on 2010-09-01 14:01

Bumped files:
PKGBUILD
http://aur.pastebin.com/2vtKbcfd

nvidia-ck.isntall
http://aur.pastebin.com/rRCuCDrS

Throws a warning but works (same warning with offical package wheen building from abs). Note that it depends on kernel26-ck-headers instead of kernel26-headers, if you haven't fixed the kernel26-ck PKGBUILD to include version number you might wanna change it to depend on kernel26-headers or run -d.

If you do not have installed nvidia from extra, uncomment line 39 and 40 for blacklisting nouveau.

lucak3 commented on 2010-09-01 11:17

256.53 official release out; nvidia-utils 256.53 already on repos

hokasch commented on 2010-08-30 17:37

You can "fix it" yourself, just comment the line where nouveau_blacklist.conf gets created in the PKGBUILD

dikei commented on 2010-08-30 17:31

Installing this along with nvidia package from extra give me this error

error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
nvidia: /etc/modprobe.d/nouveau_blacklist.conf exists in filesystem

Please fix this.

hokasch commented on 2010-08-10 14:21

Kernel26-headers from testing is not needed, as kernel26-ck provides its own headers. Just fix the "provides" array in the current kernel26-ck PKGBUILD to include the package version:
provides=('kernel26-ck-headers=2.6.35')

And change the makedepends in nvidia-ck to:
makedepends=('kernel26-headers-ck>=2.6.35' 'kernel26-headers-ck<2.6.36')'

graysky commented on 2010-08-07 09:40

256.44 is out and 2.6.35-ck is also out so:

1) Grab kernel26-ck (updated to 2.26.35 of course) and boot into it
2) Grab the following from [testing]: nvidia kernel26-headers
3) Save the following as "patch"
4) Patch this PKGBUILD with the following like so:

cd /path/to/pkgbuilddir
patch < patch


--- PKGBUILD-new 2010-08-07 05:38:03.388727902 -0400
+++ PKGBUILD 2010-08-07 05:36:20.901562471 -0400
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
# Maintainer : A.J. Korf <jacobkorf at gmail dot com>

pkgname=nvidia-ck
-pkgver=256.44
-_kernver='2.6.35-ck'
+pkgver=256.35
+_kernver='2.6.34-ck'
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="NVIDIA drivers for kernel26."
arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
url="http://www.nvidia.com/"
-depends=('kernel26>=2.6.35-ck' 'kernel26<2.6.36' "nvidia-utils=${pkgver}")
-makedepends=('kernel26-headers>=2.6.35' 'kernel26-headers<2.6.36')
+depends=('kernel26>=2.6.34-ck' 'kernel26<2.6.35' "nvidia-utils=${pkgver}")
+makedepends=('kernel26-headers>=2.6.34' 'kernel26-headers<2.6.35')
conflicts=('nvidia-96xx' 'nvidia-173xx')
license=('custom')
install=nvidia.install
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
_arch='x86'
_pkg="NVIDIA-Linux-${_arch}-${pkgver}"
source=("ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-${_arch}/${pkgver}/${_pkg}.run")
- md5sums=('cb61b75a305e78291db313dae39c625b')
+ md5sums=('f6af8917a500de28396a438f3f548c88')
elif [ "$CARCH" = "x86_64" ]; then
_arch='x86_64'
_pkg="NVIDIA-Linux-${_arch}-${pkgver}-no-compat32"
source=("ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-${_arch}/${pkgver}/${_pkg}.run")
- md5sums=('19fdd60520df7f50ae7dbb24e473872b')
+ md5sums=('7b5924f14a4d2326b4d916efdb7852ff')
fi

build() {
@@ -39,3 +39,4 @@
echo "blacklist nouveau" >> $pkgdir/etc/modprobe.d/nouveau_blacklist.conf
sed -i -e "s/KERNEL_VERSION='.*'/KERNEL_VERSION='${_kernver}'/" $startdir/nvidia.install
}
+

ajk commented on 2010-08-07 09:26

There you go guys.. Sorry for the delay.

graysky commented on 2010-08-07 08:57

256.44 is out and 2.6.35-ck is also out so:

1) Grab 2.26.35-ck and boot into it
2) Grab the following from [testing]: nvidia kernel26-headers
3) Patch this PKGBUILD with the following like so:

cd /path/to/pkgbuilddir
patch < 256.44.patch




--- PKGBUILD 2010-08-07 04:54:23.282529936 -0400
+++ PKGBUILD-2.6.35-ck 2010-08-07 04:50:51.867355351 -0400
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
# Maintainer : A.J. Korf <jacobkorf at gmail dot com>

pkgname=nvidia-ck
-pkgver=256.35
-_kernver='2.6.34-ck'
+pkgver=256.44
+_kernver='2.6.35-ck'
pkgrel=1
-pkgdesc="NVIDIA drivers for kernel26-ck."
+pkgdesc="NVIDIA drivers for kernel26."
arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
url="http://www.nvidia.com/"
-depends=('kernel26>=2.6.34-ck' 'kernel26<2.6.35-ck' "nvidia-utils=${pkgver}")
-makedepends=('kernel26-headers>=2.6.34' 'kernel26-headers<2.6.35')
+depends=('kernel26>=2.6.35-ck' 'kernel26<2.6.36' "nvidia-utils=${pkgver}")
+makedepends=('kernel26-headers>=2.6.35' 'kernel26-headers<2.6.36')
conflicts=('nvidia-96xx' 'nvidia-173xx')
license=('custom')
install=nvidia.install
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
_arch='x86'
_pkg="NVIDIA-Linux-${_arch}-${pkgver}"
source=("ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-${_arch}/${pkgver}/${_pkg}.run")
- md5sums=('f6af8917a500de28396a438f3f548c88')
+ md5sums=('cb61b75a305e78291db313dae39c625b')
elif [ "$CARCH" = "x86_64" ]; then
_arch='x86_64'
_pkg="NVIDIA-Linux-${_arch}-${pkgver}-no-compat32"
source=("ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-${_arch}/${pkgver}/${_pkg}.run")
- md5sums=('7b5924f14a4d2326b4d916efdb7852ff')
+ md5sums=('19fdd60520df7f50ae7dbb24e473872b')
fi

build() {
@@ -39,4 +39,3 @@
echo "blacklist nouveau" >> $pkgdir/etc/modprobe.d/nouveau_blacklist.conf
sed -i -e "s/KERNEL_VERSION='.*'/KERNEL_VERSION='${_kernver}'/" $startdir/nvidia.install
}
-

graysky commented on 2010-08-07 08:55

256.44 is out and 2.6.35-ck is also out so, grab 2.26.35-ck then patch use this patch for nvidia. Apply with:

cd /path/to/pkgbuilddir
patch < 256.44.patch


--- PKGBUILD 2010-08-07 04:54:23.282529936 -0400
+++ PKGBUILD-2.6.35-ck 2010-08-07 04:50:51.867355351 -0400
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
# Maintainer : A.J. Korf <jacobkorf at gmail dot com>

pkgname=nvidia-ck
-pkgver=256.35
-_kernver='2.6.34-ck'
+pkgver=256.44
+_kernver='2.6.35-ck'
pkgrel=1
-pkgdesc="NVIDIA drivers for kernel26-ck."
+pkgdesc="NVIDIA drivers for kernel26."
arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
url="http://www.nvidia.com/"
-depends=('kernel26>=2.6.34-ck' 'kernel26<2.6.35-ck' "nvidia-utils=${pkgver}")
-makedepends=('kernel26-headers>=2.6.34' 'kernel26-headers<2.6.35')
+depends=('kernel26>=2.6.35-ck' 'kernel26<2.6.36' "nvidia-utils=${pkgver}")
+makedepends=('kernel26-headers>=2.6.35' 'kernel26-headers<2.6.36')
conflicts=('nvidia-96xx' 'nvidia-173xx')
license=('custom')
install=nvidia.install
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
_arch='x86'
_pkg="NVIDIA-Linux-${_arch}-${pkgver}"
source=("ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-${_arch}/${pkgver}/${_pkg}.run")
- md5sums=('f6af8917a500de28396a438f3f548c88')
+ md5sums=('cb61b75a305e78291db313dae39c625b')
elif [ "$CARCH" = "x86_64" ]; then
_arch='x86_64'
_pkg="NVIDIA-Linux-${_arch}-${pkgver}-no-compat32"
source=("ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-${_arch}/${pkgver}/${_pkg}.run")
- md5sums=('7b5924f14a4d2326b4d916efdb7852ff')
+ md5sums=('19fdd60520df7f50ae7dbb24e473872b')
fi

build() {
@@ -39,4 +39,3 @@
echo "blacklist nouveau" >> $pkgdir/etc/modprobe.d/nouveau_blacklist.conf
sed -i -e "s/KERNEL_VERSION='.*'/KERNEL_VERSION='${_kernver}'/" $startdir/nvidia.install
}
-

graysky commented on 2010-08-05 20:41

256.44 is out. Here is a patch for the PKBUILD that will allow you to d/l and build it for x86_64. Apply with:

cd /path/to/pkgbuilddir
patch < 256.44.patch

--- PKGBUILD 2010-08-05 16:38:05.892895803 -0400
+++ PKGBUILD-new 2010-08-05 16:39:39.222886567 -0400
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# Maintainer : A.J. Korf <jacobkorf at gmail dot com>

pkgname=nvidia-ck
-pkgver=256.35
+pkgver=256.44
_kernver='2.6.34-ck'
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="NVIDIA drivers for kernel26-ck."
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
_arch='x86_64'
_pkg="NVIDIA-Linux-${_arch}-${pkgver}-no-compat32"
source=("ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-${_arch}/${pkgver}/${_pkg}.run")
- md5sums=('7b5924f14a4d2326b4d916efdb7852ff')
+ md5sums=('19fdd60520df7f50ae7dbb24e473872b')
fi

build() {

kvasthval commented on 2010-08-02 22:27

Works great for me on x86_64, too. However, please change:
'kernel26>=2.6.34-ck' 'kernel26<2.6.35-ck'
to
'kernel26-ck>=2.6.34' 'kernel26-ck<2.6.35'

The former translates into stock kernel26 instead of kernel26-ck. :-)

dhave commented on 2010-06-27 19:29

nvidia-ck-256.35-1 works fine on x86_64, ajk. Thanks!

dhave commented on 2010-06-27 19:28

Works fine, ajk. Thanks!

ajk commented on 2010-06-27 12:55

Please test and give feedback

Anonymo commented on 2010-06-26 19:59

It works; should probably add: nvidia
conflicts=('nvidia' 'nvidia-96xx' 'nvidia-173xx')

Anonymo commented on 2010-06-26 19:02

Here's my modification of the official PKGBUILD for nvidia for nvidia-ck with the nvidia.install under the dash ------------------------------------
http://pastebin.com/zTk91a9y

dhave commented on 2010-06-26 14:57

@graysky: Besides, Thomas's ooffical 256.35 PKGBUILD is prettier. I just looked at it.

dhave commented on 2010-06-26 14:24

@graysky: Besides, Thomas's ooffical 256.35 PKGBUILD is prettier. I just looked at it.

dhave commented on 2010-06-26 14:22

@graysky: Your way makes more sense, especially since the md5sums were already there. I'll go that route next time.

graysky commented on 2010-06-26 07:33

@dhave - I literally copied over the official 256.56 PKGBUILD from http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/nvidia/repos/extra-x86_64/PKGBUILD modifying just the pkgname, kernver, and depends lines which worked just fine... :?

dhave commented on 2010-06-26 06:08

I edited the PKGBUILD for nvidia-256.35 driver. Tested fine on x86_64. Should be properly edited for i686, too.

See this link in pastebin: http://aur.pastebin.com/6SGamafJ

Note that several changes beyond package version are necessary due to different directory structure in src directory as well as slightly different file naming convention.

This is to tide people over just until the maintainer posts an official PKGBUILD.

Please notify if you have a problem.

dhave commented on 2010-06-26 05:45

I edited the PKGBUILD for nvidia-256.35 driver. Tested fine on x86_64. Should be properly edited for i686, too.

See this link in pastebin: http://aur.pastebin.com/6SGamafJ

Note that several changes beyond package version are necessary due to different directory structure in src directory as well as slightly different file naming convention.

This is to tide people over just until the maintainer posts an official PKGBUILD.

Please notify if you have a problem.

Anonymous comment on 2010-06-25 22:37

Perfectly happy here, everything seems to be working just great!

ajk commented on 2010-06-23 14:47

Fixed! Thanks for the input.. You guys happy so far? Besides a little delay now and then :p

Anonymous comment on 2010-06-23 12:42

The md5 for i686 is c30af5d776e3c71c6dd8e06c30e4bf1f if you'd like to update it, installed just fine after changing that.

ajk commented on 2010-06-22 20:05

The md5 of the i386 version may be incorrect.. Sorry for the wait guys ;)

Barthalion commented on 2010-06-22 17:35

Thumbs up! Maybe it help...

Malix commented on 2010-06-21 15:27

could we get 195.36.31 please :)

graysky commented on 2010-06-17 20:34

None taken. I did actually open up a feature request: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19727

Thanks for maintaining this package.

ajk commented on 2010-06-13 00:40

This package aims to collaborate with the nvidia packages from the 'extra' repository which the Arch Linux team maintains itself. So please inform the Arch maintainers of your displeasure with the current affairs... No offense :)

graysky commented on 2010-06-06 09:53

Please add the following three lines AFTER your sed -i -e "s/KERNEL_VERSION='.*'/KERNEL_VERSION='${_kernver}'/" $startdir/nvidia.install line:

cd $srcdir/NVIDIA-Linux-$ARCH-${pkgver}-pkg0
mkdir -p $pkgdir/usr/bin
install -m755 $srcdir/NVIDIA-Linux-$ARCH-${pkgver}-pkg0/usr/bin/nvidia-smi $pkgdir/usr/bin

Why? This very handy util (nvidia-smi) allows users to get GPU temps from the shell without the need for nvidia-settings which requires X. My box for example, runs a server without a monitor and without X so I can't get the GPU temp at all. The latest nvclock does not work w/ my board.

graysky commented on 2010-06-06 09:49

Might want to add the following two lines AFTER your sed -i -e "s/KERNEL_VERSION='.*'/KERNEL_VERSION='${_kernver}'/" $startdir/nvidia.install line:

cd $srcdir/NVIDIA-Linux-$ARCH-${pkgver}-pkg0
install -m755 $srcdir/NVIDIA-Linux-$ARCH-${pkgver}-pkg0/usr/bin/nvidia-smi $pkgdir/usr/bin

This very handy util (nvidia-smi) allows users to get GPU temps from the shell without the need for nvidia-settings which requires X. My box for example, runs a server without a monitor and without X.

graysky commented on 2010-05-30 11:25

Great package - thanks for maintaining it!

ajk commented on 2010-05-23 18:04

Or you can disable nouveau in the kernel config assuming you use the nvidia driver anyway...

jskier commented on 2010-05-23 14:33

Disable nouveau (!nouveau) in the rc.conf file, then it worked for me.

aberkoke commented on 2010-05-23 14:16

It doesn't work for me. I think 2.6.34-ck has kms enabled...

ammon commented on 2010-05-23 13:56

I think you should make novueau blacklisted, like in nvidia-beta package.

ajk commented on 2010-05-23 12:14

Updated guys... sorry for the long wait

Malix commented on 2010-05-23 11:17

just out of curiosity, should this work with kernel26-ck 2.6.34-1 just by changing the required versions on PKGBUILD. this package is the only one preventing me from updating.

ajk commented on 2010-05-23 10:58

Maybe you can give that a try? Use my PKGBUILD and try to make a beta package ;)

Barthalion commented on 2010-05-22 17:46

What do you think about make beta package?

ajk commented on 2010-05-13 08:52

I know that, but nvidia-utils and lib32-nvidia-utils are dependend on this package.. So I'll wait until the chain is updated ;)

hnws commented on 2010-05-13 03:14

I think 195.36.24 can also be used on xorg 1.7.6...

ajk commented on 2010-05-12 10:16

As soon as Xorg 1.8 comes to extra I'll update, not everybody is using the testing repo...

hnws commented on 2010-04-28 02:04

please update to the newest 195.36.24 with xorg 1.8 support since xorg 1.8 has been moved into testing.

vesath commented on 2010-04-11 17:37

Could you add a "provides=('nvidia')" field to the PKGBUILD, since nvidia is required for, e.g., http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31514 ? Thanks.

lucak3 commented on 2010-04-01 10:54

you're right, that i didn't know :)
Btw, you can use the PKGBUILD in testing as a base, i just modified and built it, it works fine

ffjia commented on 2010-04-01 10:25

lucak3: You don't need "kernel26-headers" package to compile this package, in my opinion. The header files are included in "kernel26-ck" package.

lucak3 commented on 2010-04-01 09:58

195.36.15 in testing requires kernel26-headers>=2.6.33 : if someone (like me) hasnt compiled and installed those, he cant build them
you should probably insert them in makedepends when you prepare the new version

Anonymous comment on 2010-03-31 11:08

You missed: http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=122606
Current official release: 195.36.15
:)

ajk commented on 2010-03-30 18:06

Dude.. Why am I flagged out of date? Am I missing something?

ajk commented on 2010-03-30 18:06

Dudes.. Why am I flagged out of date? Am I missing something?