Package Details: nvidia-docker 2.0.3-4

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-docker.git (read-only)
Package Base: nvidia-docker
Description: Build and run Docker containers leveraging NVIDIA GPUs
Upstream URL: https://github.com/NVIDIA/nvidia-docker
Keywords: cuda docker gpu nvidia
Licenses: BSD
Submitter: marcelhuber
Maintainer: vanyasem
Last Packager: vanyasem
Votes: 27
Popularity: 1.537642
First Submitted: 2016-07-26 09:17
Last Updated: 2018-06-07 04:50

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

SilverMight commented on 2018-06-13 01:05

Getting this in docker.service logs

level=error msg="get nvidia_driver_396.24: error looking up volume plugin nvidia-docker: plugin \"nvidia-docker\" not found"

vanyasem commented on 2018-06-07 04:46

Changed the package to use original sources

vanyasem commented on 2018-05-24 19:07

Thank you, I will fix it as soon as possible

Eschwartz commented on 2018-05-23 23:05

Also this is no longer an arch-dependent package, it's an any package.

Eschwartz commented on 2018-05-23 18:14

Please package this properly, using original sources instead of rpms.

There's no reason to use some prebuilt rpm just to cp these files:

https://github.com/NVIDIA/nvidia-docker/blob/master/nvidia-docker https://github.com/NVIDIA/nvidia-docker/blob/master/daemon.json https://github.com/NVIDIA/nvidia-docker/blob/master/LICENSE

rpm spec which cp's those files: https://github.com/NVIDIA/nvidia-docker/blob/master/rpm/SPECS/nvidia-docker2.spec

vfbsilva commented on 2018-05-09 23:33

Problems to run here:

nvidia-docker run --rm nvidia/cuda nvidia-smi

docker: Error response from daemon: create nvidia_driver_396.24:

VolumeDriver.Create: internal error, check logs for details. See 'docker run --help

lukeyeager commented on 2018-04-12 20:07

@whenov got it, thanks for the context. For now, I'm going to leave the packages as they are. For one reason, each package has it's own version number upstream, and I feel like it's useful to see that in my local package list.

If others agree that they'd prefer a single package, please chime in!

whenov commented on 2018-03-16 01:53

@lukeyeager, it's just that these dependency packages are unlikely to be the dependencies of any other packages. And for those who prefer to use AUR manually with makepkg, it's more convenient to have a single package.

lukeyeager commented on 2018-03-15 16:29

@whenov That's definitely possible. I was just following the upstream packaging convention. What's the upside of having a single package?

I'm also happy to let this package die and let the nvidia-docker v1 package maintainer take over. I haven't found time this week to update all the out-of-date dependencies of this package anyway.

whenov commented on 2018-03-15 16:05

Is it possible to merge nvidia-docker2 and its four dependencies into a single package?