Search Criteria
Package Details: obs-plugin-looking-glass 2:B6-9
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/looking-glass.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | looking-glass |
Description: | Plugin for OBS Studio to stream directly from Looking Glass without having to record the Looking Glass client |
Upstream URL: | https://looking-glass.io/ |
Licenses: | GPL2 |
Submitter: | Omar007 |
Maintainer: | Omar007 |
Last Packager: | Omar007 |
Votes: | 37 |
Popularity: | 0.56 |
First Submitted: | 2017-12-22 16:49 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-08-07 11:00 (UTC) |
Dependencies (13)
- glibc (glibc-gitAUR, glibc-linux4AUR, glibc-eacAUR, glibc-eac-binAUR, glibc-eac-rocoAUR)
- obs-studio (obs-studio-libertyAUR, obs-studio-gitAUR, obs-studio-tytan652AUR, obs-studio-browserAUR, obs-studio-rcAUR)
- cmake (cmake-gitAUR) (make)
- fontconfig (fontconfig-gitAUR, fontconfig-ubuntuAUR) (make)
- libpipewire (libpipewire-gitAUR, libpipewire-full-gitAUR) (make)
- libpulse (pulseaudio-dummyAUR, libpulse-gitAUR) (make)
- libsamplerate (libsamplerate-gitAUR) (make)
- libxi (libxi-gitAUR) (make)
- libxpresent (make)
- libxss (make)
- obs-studio (obs-studio-libertyAUR, obs-studio-gitAUR, obs-studio-tytan652AUR, obs-studio-browserAUR, obs-studio-rcAUR) (make)
- spice-protocol (spice-protocol-gitAUR) (make)
- wayland-protocols (wayland-protocols-gitAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .. 10 Next › Last »
xiretza commented on 2023-01-29 19:42 (UTC) (edited on 2023-01-29 19:43 (UTC) by xiretza)
The only difference between
8b7a4b6d33380299512bef103331635c9e9855ae0712cbe4d9ccbec2c2499c77318502aa3e0259451ef32c414ef5c8fbc103513bcd924570097dd866934cbe10
(PKGBUILD) and558981d6b32098076ef0775a748da349941551352cbef836e37310e43e5cd6072df3dec6fa2418a9abecc7729ef0c1c6869e3168d05a3d76bea46c6eb8c4e82c
(upstream) is yet again a modification time update of the VERSION file.MacGyver commented on 2023-01-24 17:00 (UTC) (edited on 2023-01-24 17:01 (UTC) by MacGyver)
I'm now seeing
558981d6b32098076ef0775a748da349941551352cbef836e37310e43e5cd6072df3dec6fa2418a9abecc7729ef0c1c6869e3168d05a3d76bea46c6eb8c4e82c
forlooking-glass-B6.tar.gz
. It doesn't help that they don't publish the expected checksum themselves anywhere.<deleted-account> commented on 2023-01-20 21:45 (UTC)
Currently fails to build, downgrading binutils to 2.39 on Arch worked ($ downgrade binutils). Issue is related to a change with libbfd.a that binutils made in 2.40.
Related GitHub issue: https://github.com/gnif/LookingGlass/issues/1056
<deleted-account> commented on 2023-01-20 21:30 (UTC)
Fails to build as of today due to ZSTD, related GitHub issue: https://github.com/gnif/LookingGlass/issues/1056
Omar007 commented on 2023-01-16 08:48 (UTC)
@xiretza: So far I've not. It only happened twice over the whole lifespan thus far afaik so I haven't bothered. I don't know about others.
That said, checking the artifact now, the checksum still seems to be the same. I downloaded the artifact fresh (twice to confirm) and it still matches the checksum of PKGBUILD
2:B6-2
. It seems it hasn't changed at the moment. Can you recheck on your end?xiretza commented on 2023-01-15 19:19 (UTC)
Looks like it changed again, now it's
25d720c7dd2711c86ebde73c6f4db990b60d4015d075ca4b33b60e16937bf700
... Has anyone complained to upstream about this yet?Omar007 commented on 2023-01-10 19:23 (UTC) (edited on 2023-01-10 19:24 (UTC) by Omar007)
I have compared the website artifact against the sourcecode and I've been unable to find any differences (maybe the artifact VERSION file changed but that isn't relevant/dangerous here) so I have updated the checksum. The update should be pushed to the AUR shortly.
Omar007 commented on 2023-01-07 18:21 (UTC) (edited on 2023-01-07 18:21 (UTC) by Omar007)
@untwisted; that is possible if the upstream artifact has changed. This should generally never just randomly happen and if it does, it can be an indication of a malicious actor having been able to either change the artifact or intercept yours somehow.
Now I highly doubt that has actually happened, this seems way to niche of an item to target so that means upstream probably repackaged it for some reason on another. That said, I will not just blindly update the checksum without verifying the new artifact but I'm going to have to do that later.
untwisted commented on 2023-01-07 16:15 (UTC) (edited on 2023-01-07 16:15 (UTC) by untwisted)
Looks like the sha512sum is incorrect? Installation was failing so I downloaded the package from the Looking Glass site and ran a sha512 manually and got
8b7a4b6d33380299512bef103331635c9e9855ae0712cbe4d9ccbec2c2499c77318502aa3e0259451ef32c414ef5c8fbc103513bcd924570097dd866934cbe10
.Modifying the PKGBUILD to this SHA value enabled the build to work.
Excalibur commented on 2022-12-23 12:28 (UTC)
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .. 10 Next › Last »