Search Criteria
Package Details: obsidian-appimage 1.9.10-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/obsidian.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | obsidian |
Description: | A powerful knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files (AppImage version) |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/obsidianmd/obsidian-releases |
Licenses: | custom |
Conflicts: | obsidian |
Provides: | obsidian |
Submitter: | NekoLOvO |
Maintainer: | NekoLOvO |
Last Packager: | NekoLOvO |
Votes: | 0 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2025-06-03 13:49 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-08-24 14:56 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- fuse2
- zlib (zlib-gitAUR, zlib-ng-compat-gitAUR, zlib-ng-compat)
Latest Comments
shawny commented on 2025-08-24 10:27 (UTC)
@NekoLOvO, is the package abandoned? It's months behind latest release. Please advise.
oech3 commented on 2025-08-05 07:20 (UTC)
If appgrid means desktop entry, it is masked by
NoExtract
and requests to remove them is pending.NekoLOvO commented on 2025-08-03 16:18 (UTC) (edited on 2025-08-04 21:04 (UTC) by NekoLOvO)
@oech3 I don't actually know what your concern is. I don't think rebuilding native modules(like electron) can solve capability issues because capability issue doesn't mean the modules have errors.
And the
extra/obsidian
is a repackage using obsidan's source code, this package is a binary package provide by obsidian official from their github release page, they are not the same package.Furthermore, I don't actually like installing electron separately(if you install
extra/obsidian
,electron34
is a dependency, and there will be a electron34 in your appgrid, that's annoying), and this package provides a build-in electron, so there won't be a electron in your appgridoech3 commented on 2025-08-03 04:43 (UTC) (edited on 2025-08-03 04:53 (UTC) by oech3)
Is it have a chance to fix by rebuilding native modules? I'm not sure is it allowed at official package: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/obsidian/-/blob/main/Packaging%20permission%20from%20Arch%20Linux.eml?ref_type=heads
NekoLOvO commented on 2025-08-03 04:30 (UTC)
@oech3 Extra/obsidian uses native electron while this package uses a bundled electron. Sometime native system-wide modules can cause compatibility issues
oech3 commented on 2025-07-12 23:17 (UTC)
Whai is the issue of
obsidian
on Arch'selectron
? This should be existing as a bug report for Extra/obsidian instead of duplicated package.