Package Details: ocaml-utop 2.15.0-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/ocaml-utop.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: ocaml-utop
Description: Universal toplevel for OCaml
Upstream URL: https://github.com/ocaml-community/utop
Keywords: editing emacs history improved library ocaml real realtime time toplevel tuareg universal
Licenses: BSD-3-Clause
Submitter: metasyntax
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: dpeukert
Votes: 11
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2011-08-22 03:23 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-01-22 08:21 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2

metasyntax commented on 2011-09-18 22:52 (UTC)

Updated to remove dependency on ocaml-with-complibs and instead require ocaml-compiler-libs. Thanks!

zorun commented on 2011-09-18 17:16 (UTC)

The compiler libraries are now available in the "ocaml-compiler-libs" package in [extra] :)

metasyntax commented on 2011-09-07 23:37 (UTC)

Updated to rely on my variant of the 'ocaml' package that provides the compiler libraries. It should now be possible to simply use e.g. yaourt to install 'ocaml-utop' without having to manually add the compiler libraries to your existing 'ocaml' installation. When the compiler libraries are integrated into the standard 'ocaml' package in [extra] then I will adjust the dependency back to that package. I think this is the best way to provide support to users at this point, but comments are always welcome! Thanks for using.

zorun commented on 2011-08-26 02:24 (UTC)

Ok, good to hear! This kind of request is supposed to go to the bug tracker [1] for future reference. I've just filled a request [2] with a PKGBUILD heavily inspired by yours (I've just split it into build() and package()), thank you! And by the way, don't forget to vote for your own packages, a 0-vote package isn't really appealing ;) [1] https://bugs.archlinux.org [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/25763

metasyntax commented on 2011-08-25 22:22 (UTC)

zorun: Yes, sorry I didn't leave a comment. I asked the ocaml package maintainer earlier this week if he'd be interested in including the compiler libs in the ocaml package, I think that would be a much better route than having a separate package. I haven't heard back yet. In the mean time, you might try the modified ocaml package I've been using at [1] - I debated submitting this package (perhaps as ocaml-with-complib or something like that) to the AUR as an alternative for ocaml, but decided against it to avoid confusion. [1] https://bitbucket.org/taylor_venable/aur/src/tip/ocaml/PKGBUILD

zorun commented on 2011-08-25 20:27 (UTC)

Looks like this is missing a dependency: `ocaml-compiler-libs` [1] However, this package is fairly out-of-date, broken, and even if it wasn't, it is kind of an overkill dependency (it basically involves building the whole OCaml compiler) Besides, it could easily be bundled in the `ocaml` package in extra. I'll try and update [1], but if it proves too difficult and/or too long to build, we're left with asking for integration within the `ocaml` package. @metasyntax: were you aware of the issue? (I guess so). A comment about it would have been much appreciated. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12333

« First ‹ Previous 1 2