Package Details: ocenaudio-bin 3.14.8-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/ocenaudio-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: ocenaudio-bin
Description: Cross-platform, easy to use, fast and functional audio editor
Upstream URL: https://www.ocenaudio.com/
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: ocenaudio
Provides: ocenaudio
Submitter: SpotlightKid
Maintainer: azzbcc
Last Packager: azzbcc
Votes: 51
Popularity: 0.44
First Submitted: 2015-07-23 23:16 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-12-04 11:15 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last »

BrainwreckedTech commented on 2016-02-03 08:30 (UTC)

:: Checking ocenaudio-bin integrity... ==> ERROR: install should not be an array :: failed to verify ocenaudio-bin integrity May have something to do with the new version of libalpm.

SpotlightKid commented on 2016-01-06 13:49 (UTC) (edited on 2016-01-06 13:49 (UTC) by SpotlightKid)

New upstream version 3.0.4 adds JACK support, so dependency 'jack' was added. Here's the answer I got from the project maintainers, asking them to provide versioned binary downloads. "[...] thanks for using ocenaudio. The latest versions always have important fixes, so it is always important to download the latest version.…" So, I guess that means no. :(

SpotlightKid commented on 2015-12-14 17:09 (UTC)

Sigh, I really wish the project would provide versioned download files. There's a new ocenaudio release 3.0.3, but the download file name stays the same, even if the file contents change. I've asked the project maintainers, whether they can provide versioned download files in the future. Updated the package to new version 3.0.3. When this happens again, please just flag the package out-of-date. Thanks!

astro commented on 2015-12-14 16:52 (UTC)

Compilation error ! : validate packages ocenaudio_debian64.deb ... FAILED LICENSE.TXT ... OK Can you remove the error checksum with the rights checksum ? Thx in advance ;)

SpotlightKid commented on 2015-12-07 10:48 (UTC) (edited on 2015-12-07 10:59 (UTC) by SpotlightKid)

I've updated the package to 3.0 and took kolewu's advice to leave files in /opt, because otherwise probably the translations wouldn't work. The new debian packages contained no license file and I couldn't find one on the website either, so I just assumed the license hasn't changed and included the license file from the 2.x version.

kolewu commented on 2015-12-05 21:57 (UTC) (edited on 2015-12-06 01:45 (UTC) by kolewu)

Version 3.0 is out and has a bunch of changes. Maybe it's better, to leave the installation as it is and don't move it out of /opt?

KenjiTakahashi commented on 2015-07-29 19:43 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure it does not require gcc-libs-multilib. Other than that, it seems to work fine now.

SpotlightKid commented on 2015-07-28 16:24 (UTC)

Sorry for the mixup, corrected now. Anything wrong with the package() function besides the variable name typo in line 31?

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last »