Arch Linux User Repository

Yes, but I hope I'm not the only one :p

I hope you're happy now :)

I think you misunderstood the purpose of the arch directive :p

Even if the package can be compiled for every arch, you should list all these arch in the array. any is for architecture independent package.

As this package is already compiled, and the ARM version is a 32-bit executable, the array should not accept aarch64 or any incompatible ARM arch.

At the current status the arch=('any') is because Arch supports i686, x86_64 and ARM ( through its various types ), so typing any would successfully met all of them ( the arm library contained in the omnikey zip works since ARMv5 and more ).

Related to prepare() and unzip I'll take care of them on the next version bump. Thanks for the hint :)

You should not use arch=('any') when the resulting package contains architecture dependent files (like ifdokccid.so).

The extraction phase should rather take place in the prepare() function.

And the unzip makedepends seems unused :p

Package is now multi-platform enabled. It supports i686, x86_64 and arm too. Enjoy!

Submission date isn't the only consideration. Here, omnikey_ifdokccid you want to merge into this package is named directly after the source. omnikey_cardman_5x2x is named after one model, when multiple are mentioned in the description.

Personally I'd be inclined to merge things the other way around for clarity. But I think you should talk to the maintainer of the other package first; maybe you both can co-maintain it.

You should asks for a merge then ;)
By the way I think a better name would be pcsc-omnikey (like pcsc-cyberjack). Or ccid-omnikey, I'm not sure :p

It's basically the same as this one, but this one exists since 2010 and the other one since 2015.

Yes, but what about omnikey_ifdokccid ? :p