Arch Linux User Repository

Oh, and look, a fix for the issue reported here was committed a few months ago! Yep, totally outdated and unmaintained.

kokoko3k, I'll integrate the fix here tonight, or you can use onedrive-git.

Take offense all you want, none of that justifies you forking it and declaring yourself the new upstream just because the project wasn't what you wanted. Think back to the ffmpeg/libav split, did they just say "We're ffmpeg now!"? No, that't not how things work. You still claim it's dead since 2018 when the last release was less than a year and a half ago. All lies and deception.

@Scimmia - I take total offence to your statement that I am promoting a lie. 'skilion' has confirmed the following: I don't want to spend time to implement and maintain features I don't use. Also I do not want to feel obliged to offer support when things stop working

Reference: https://github.com/skilion/onedrive/issues/518#issuecomment-717604726

Perhaps a little more pragmatism from yourself even after 4 years .........

npreining, that a lie told by abraunegg to justify them taking over the project without the consent of the developer.

kokoko3k, I'll take a look at it in the next couple of days.

This program is outdated and unmaintained, please use the package onedrive-abraunegg which is fully supported and maintained.

It fails to build: src/qxor.d(67): Error: need this for lengthInBytes of type immutable(ulong)

@ogarcia 100% agree with you re fixing this package .. but some folk are rather steadfast on this for absolutely zero logical reason .. it is what it is - I am sorry for your inconvenience (and to all other Arch AUR users who fall into the same trap) of installing a buggy, unsupported, unmaintained package.

@eschwartz Your email comment to @ogarcia really shows just how out-of-touch with reality you are.

Hello, a few days ago I started to use OneDrive for work reasons and after see that this package source is abandoned, I realized that the work continues live in a fork by abraunegg. As I can see more distributions like Debian or Slackware adopt this fork as onedrive package. At this moment I do a request for rename or merge this package with onedrive-abraunegg: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2020-April/039852.html

A few days later I receive this response, a simply "not how forks work": https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2020-May/040109.html

I try to contact with Eli and Doug to obtain more detailed explanation about why of this reply, but no response.

I don't know if there is personal quarrels or something else, I only look for the best to users and Arch community. I simply think that maintain an outdated package having better options is a mistake.