Search Criteria
Package Details: oneko 1.2.5-6
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/oneko.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | oneko |
Description: | A cat that chases around your cursor |
Upstream URL: | http://www.daidouji.com/oneko/ |
Licenses: | Public Domain |
Submitter: | actionless |
Maintainer: | actionless |
Last Packager: | actionless |
Votes: | 36 |
Popularity: | 2.26 |
First Submitted: | 2019-12-20 09:43 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-05-06 18:10 (UTC) |
Dependencies (5)
- libx11 (libx11-gitAUR)
- libxext (libxext-gitAUR)
- desktop-file-utils (desktop-file-utils-gitAUR) (make)
- imake (make)
- make (make-gitAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
actionless commented on 2025-05-08 02:32 (UTC)
@p90, great, thanks for understanding 👍
p90 commented on 2025-05-07 14:25 (UTC)
@actionless
because I literally tried to compiled the program, saw it did not work, went to look here and only saw a 2024 comment about compilations issues and assumed this was the cause. So yes, I misunderstood and used the word still.
Next time, I will just ignore it.
actionless commented on 2025-05-06 19:27 (UTC) (edited on 2025-05-06 19:28 (UTC) by actionless)
@alef, btw i was thinking to turn it into github fork, to make patchset more maintainable in the long-term - so if you interesting in maintaining it, there are couple more of similar compiler warnings due to func signatures, which would turn from warnings into errors next year or so - so you could try to fix those in advance
and also it would make it easier contributing new 'personas'/'characters'
actionless commented on 2025-05-06 19:21 (UTC)
@alef, sorry about that, but i'm glad it motivated you for some C archeology 👌😸
alef commented on 2025-05-06 18:57 (UTC)
You've got to be kidding me! I found this program and package yesterday and just created an account to post a patch suggestion to make this compile and bam it was patched in the meanwhile :o
Anyhow, gcc2025.patch works - the code compiles and works ok! Thanks!
actionless commented on 2025-05-06 18:12 (UTC)
@p90, why you've used word 'still' if you don't have a smallest clue what was broken before? why just randomly providing incorrect information for no reason? that's stupid
p90 commented on 2025-05-06 17:53 (UTC)
Jup, still broken it seems
OTTSOUNDGOODIZER commented on 2024-06-11 14:15 (UTC)
compilation is failing for me, i did the following patches and it works now https://pastebin.com/pRphpSVS
sorry for the weird garbled diff i could not for the life of me fix the output