Thanks for sharing the answer, that's good to know! Learned something new there :)
Search Criteria
Package Details: openai-codex-bin 0.65.0-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/openai-codex-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | openai-codex-bin |
| Description: | Lightweight coding agent that runs in your terminal (binary release) |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/openai/codex |
| Keywords: | ai assistant chatgpt cli codex openai |
| Licenses: | Apache |
| Conflicts: | openai-codex |
| Provides: | openai-codex |
| Submitter: | jackmhny |
| Maintainer: | jackmhny |
| Last Packager: | jackmhny |
| Votes: | 9 |
| Popularity: | 1.67 |
| First Submitted: | 2025-07-21 20:48 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2025-12-08 09:27 (UTC) |
gwuensch commented on 2025-11-13 22:52 (UTC)
cg505 commented on 2025-11-13 22:43 (UTC)
@gwuensch I asked about this on the openai-codex AUR deletion request and got this response:
openai-codex-bin can obviously stay, since its a different kind of package (packaged by upstream directly). There are many binary releases of "official" archlinux packages (being upstream compiled/packaged releases) packaged in the AUR for the exact same reason, no problem there.
gwuensch commented on 2025-11-13 22:41 (UTC) (edited on 2025-11-13 22:41 (UTC) by gwuensch)
Also, just an FYI for those using this package -
openai-codexpackage is now in theextrarepo, so you can install it without building yourself or using AUR.
Is there any reason for this package to be kept then? I would've expected it to already be yanked by now. Maybe an oversight by the mods.
Are y'all fine with submitting a deletion request? I don't see any added value from this package. Thanks for maintaining for the past months @jackmhny!
cg505 commented on 2025-11-12 23:50 (UTC)
Also, just an FYI for those using this package - openai-codex package is now in the extra repo, so you can install it without building yourself or using AUR.
jackmhny commented on 2025-11-12 23:09 (UTC)
thanks chmouel; and for those interested in pulling straight from the main branch's HEAD, see AUR @ openai-codex-git, and let me know if you experience any problems with it
chmouel commented on 2025-10-30 13:15 (UTC) (edited on 2025-10-30 13:15 (UTC) by chmouel)
I have forked this pkg and made a new package here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openai-codex-autoup-bin since the package gets updated often, I made a nightly update via a GitHub action https://github.com/chmouel/aur-update
jackmhny commented on 2025-10-23 18:38 (UTC)
thanks for patience, been busy midterms not gonna add in DeepChirp's linked ALCN bot-- given recent AUR attacks I don't feel comfortable opening myself to a supply chain attack on ALCN or some other level of the project
esemeniuc commented on 2025-10-15 15:59 (UTC)
Bump on upgrade!
gwuensch commented on 2025-10-11 23:06 (UTC) (edited on 2025-10-11 23:15 (UTC) by gwuensch)
Respectfully, I'd rather wait a few days longer for an update that has been tested (or is at the very least supervised) by a real person than having instant version bumps which might break things (even if infrequently).
Of course, if @jackmhny as maintainer thinks this solution is appropriate, I won't stand in the way, but I don't see the added value.
esemeniuc commented on 2025-10-11 05:17 (UTC)
would love to see @DeepChirp work merged in!
Pinned Comments
chmouel commented on 2025-10-30 13:15 (UTC) (edited on 2025-10-30 13:15 (UTC) by chmouel)
I have forked this pkg and made a new package here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openai-codex-autoup-bin since the package gets updated often, I made a nightly update via a GitHub action https://github.com/chmouel/aur-update