Search Criteria
Package Details: openblas-lapack 0.3.28-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/openblas-lapack.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | openblas-lapack |
| Description: | Optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2 1.13 BSD (providing blas, lapack, and cblas) |
| Upstream URL: | http://www.openblas.net/ |
| Licenses: | BSD |
| Conflicts: | blas, cblas, lapack, lapacke, openblas |
| Provides: | blas, cblas, lapack, lapacke, openblas |
| Submitter: | sftrytry |
| Maintainer: | thrasibule |
| Last Packager: | thrasibule |
| Votes: | 92 |
| Popularity: | 0.001262 |
| First Submitted: | 2013-11-20 23:53 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-08-09 12:09 (UTC) |
Dependencies (3)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc11-libsAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
- gcc-fortran (gcc-fortran-gitAUR, gcc11-fortranAUR, gcc-fortran-snapshotAUR) (make)
- perl (perl-gitAUR) (make)
Required by (640)
- abinit (requires blas)
- abinit (requires lapack)
- admixtools-git (requires openblas)
- algodoo (requires lapack)
- ambertools (requires blas)
- ambertools (requires lapack)
- amino-git (requires cblas)
- amino-git (requires lapack)
- apbs (requires blas)
- apbs (requires lapack)
- armadillo (requires blas)
- armadillo (requires lapack)
- arpack++ (requires blas)
- arpack++ (requires lapack)
- arpack-git (requires lapack)
- arrayfire-git (requires cblas)
- arrayfire-git (requires lapacke)
- astromatic-sextractor (requires openblas)
- atompaw (requires lapack)
- atomsk-git (requires blas)
- Show 620 more...
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .. 16 Next › Last »
Muflone commented on 2023-12-09 16:56 (UTC)
@thrasibule if this package is built with different flags then it's a duplicated package.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Rules_of_submission
Does this build add something new and additional to the openblas package? If not I'll proceed with the package deletion
MarsSeed commented on 2023-12-05 15:51 (UTC)
blas-openblas has
replaces=('openblas-lapack'), as per FS#78781.thrasibule commented on 2023-12-05 15:22 (UTC)
@muflone, it's not the same. It's built with different flags (DYNAMIC_ARCH=0 and USE_TLS=1).
Muflone commented on 2023-12-04 22:01 (UTC)
@thrasibule isn't this package a duplicate of https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/openblas/-/blob/main/PKGBUILD?ref_type=heads ?
If so I'll proceed with deleting this package
MarsSeed commented on 2023-06-15 14:30 (UTC)
Hm, okay, right. Then you don't need to add a new conflicts entry. Thanks for checking.
thrasibule commented on 2023-06-15 14:03 (UTC)
blas-openblas and openblas-lapack already conflict (through blas). I don't think you can have both installed at the same time. Is there something that's broken right now?
MarsSeed commented on 2023-06-15 12:20 (UTC) (edited on 2023-06-15 12:21 (UTC) by MarsSeed)
@thrasibule, as a quick interim measure, please kindly add
provides=(blas-openblas=$pkgver)andconflicts=(blas-openblas).The conflicts is an obvious formality and necessity now.
The provides would help users' migration in case they have one or more AUR packages still depending on this one while others already switched their depends to the repo variant.
MarsSeed commented on 2023-06-15 11:12 (UTC)
@carlosal1015, the new Arch change you mention means there is a new blas-openblas package, which is essentially the same as this.
So this AUR package should be deleted and users should install the repo package if they want to use the OpenBLAS implementation of blas, cblas, lapack, lapacke.
carlosal1015 commented on 2023-06-14 22:59 (UTC)
Hi @thrasibule, this change implies reinstall openblas-lapack if I want use this blas implementation by default?
Thank you.
prs commented on 2023-05-01 16:36 (UTC) (edited on 2023-05-01 16:36 (UTC) by prs)
Hardware Model: Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ADA05 64bit
Processor: AMD Ryzen™ 5 3500U with Radeon™ Vega Mobile Gfx × 8
Graphics: AMD Radeon™ Vega 8 Graphics
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .. 16 Next › Last »