Package Details: opencryptoki 3.26.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/opencryptoki.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: opencryptoki
Description: PKCS11 implementation for Linux
Upstream URL: https://github.com/opencryptoki/opencryptoki
Licenses: CPL
Submitter: mutantmonkey
Maintainer: mutantmonkey
Last Packager: mutantmonkey
Votes: 18
Popularity: 0.000019
First Submitted: 2015-08-17 05:50 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-11-11 08:50 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

simona commented on 2025-11-12 09:01 (UTC)

solved. In case it helps, I installed the byacc-bison aur package instead of bison. I think the incompatibility with byacc-bison should be noted.

mutantmonkey commented on 2025-11-12 06:38 (UTC)

@simona I cannot reproduce this. The build runs fine in an isolated environment: https://github.com/mutantmonkey/aur/commit/58985ccfd16dee761047b2dedf0069a6947ea763/checks/55062537568/logs

simona commented on 2025-11-11 10:10 (UTC) (edited on 2025-11-11 10:10 (UTC) by simona)

why bison report syntax error? at line 65 in cdfparase.y

simona commented on 2025-06-18 09:31 (UTC) 


/usr/bin/mkdir -p usr/lib/config &&  /bin/sh ./ylwrap usr/lib/config/cfgparse.y cfgparse.tab.c usr/lib/config/cfgparse.c cfgparse.tab.h usr/lib/config/cfgparse.h cfgparse.output usr/lib/config/cfgparse.output -- bison -d -v
bison: e - line 65 of "/home/simona/.cache/yay/opencryptoki/src/opencryptoki-3.25.0/usr/lib/config/cfgparse.y", syntax error
<num> NUMBER
^
make: *** [Makefile:15791: usr/lib/config/cfgparse.c] Error 1

thebagarius commented on 2023-09-14 18:59 (UTC)

@mutantmonkey all good man? did you miss the email again?

the package is marked out of date 2022-11-08. today is 2023-09-14 almost a year later.

mutantmonkey commented on 2022-01-15 03:22 (UTC) (edited on 2022-01-15 03:22 (UTC) by mutantmonkey)

Is there a reason that this package remains outdated for months?

Yes, the reason is that I missed the out-of-date notification email. The package is updated now; I apologize for the delay.

grawity commented on 2022-01-14 14:52 (UTC)

It would also be nice to mark this package as conflicting with the git version:

It's the job of alternate versions to mark themselves as conflicting with the main version. It's not reasonable to expect that the main version would list every possible alternate as conflict.

arch-dev commented on 2022-01-14 13:19 (UTC) (edited on 2022-01-14 13:22 (UTC) by arch-dev)

Is there a reason that this package remains outdated for months? Especially when the fix involves just two lines:

pkgver=3.17.0

sha256sums=('785596925738855b33b29bdff2399f613b892e7c6000d9ffbf79fe32c2aeaeee'

It would also be nice to mark this package as conflicting with the git version:

conflicts=('opencryptoki-git')

1 2 3 Next › Last »