Package Details: opendnssec 2.1.12-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: opendnssec
Description: Turn-key solution for DNSSEC
Upstream URL:
Licenses: BSD
Submitter: javitonino
Maintainer: javitonino
Last Packager: javitonino
Votes: 13
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2012-01-19 17:39 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2022-11-08 22:13 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

klemens commented on 2017-01-09 21:20 (UTC)

I think the package release number should be bumped because of the changed soname of ldns ( It still compiles and works fine.

javitonino commented on 2015-02-05 17:54 (UTC)

Updated the packages to use systemd-tmpfiles as outlined by mbunkus. Thanks!

mbunkus commented on 2015-01-28 12:55 (UTC)

(Deledted my previous comments and updated this one with correct information) Trying to update to today's PKGBUILD gives me this error message: error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) opendnssec: /var/run exists in filesystem Currently on Arch /var/run is a symlink to /run, but your package tries to overwrite that symlink with a directory. The proper solution for this is to use systemd's tmpfiles mechanism and to leave /var/run alone in your package. For example, create a file /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/opendnssec.conf with the following content: d /run/opendnssec 0750 opendnssec opendnssec and then run »systemd-tmpfiles --create« from the install script so that it can create the directory for you. That will also be done automatically on boot. Thanks.

fauno commented on 2013-06-11 15:28 (UTC)

done! same link as before

javitonino commented on 2013-06-11 15:20 (UTC)

Good point, I will follow you on that change :) You may also want to remove the upgrade notice from opendnssec.install, as well as "migrate_adapters_1.sqlite3" from the PKGBUILD. This is only needed when upgrading from 1.3, and it seems as if you haven't distributed that version.

fauno commented on 2013-06-11 15:09 (UTC)

the opendnssec dirs shouldn't be world-readable, i'm making this change on my version :)

javitonino commented on 2013-06-11 15:04 (UTC)

There were different sublicenses for different files. However, after reading the LICENSE again, I think it could be marked simple as BSD, as all three licenses are BSD. I have updated the PKGBUILD to reflect this. Thanks!