Package Details: openlens-bin 6.5.2-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/openlens-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: openlens-bin
Description: The Kubernetes IDE (fork lens-bin without lenscloud-lens-extension). Read more - https://github.com/lensapp/lens/issues/5444
Upstream URL: https://k8slens.dev
Keywords: k8s kubernetes lens openlens
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: lens, lens-bin
Provides: lens
Submitter: bko
Maintainer: bko
Last Packager: bko
Votes: 16
Popularity: 0.91
First Submitted: 2022-06-01 18:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-09-03 06:58 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

HornyApple commented on 2024-09-30 21:50 (UTC) (edited on 2024-09-30 21:52 (UTC) by HornyApple)

Please add tinysparql as a dependency.

ldd `which open-lens` | grep sparql
    libtinysparql-3.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libtinysparql-3.0.so.0 (0x00007df652470000)

bko commented on 2023-09-03 06:59 (UTC)

Thanks, kgs. Fixed.

kgs commented on 2023-09-02 15:01 (UTC)

sha256sums are outdated. new one is:

sha256sums_x86_64=('1af3e53480705c6349523b16481fc5b62e94734a91ff5b72c2154582d8a91dcb')

deuscode87 commented on 2023-04-25 02:30 (UTC)

You can get around this by doing a clean build

yay -S openlens-bin                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
AUR Explicit (1): openlens-bin-6.4.15-2
:: PKGBUILD up to date, skipping download: openlens-bin
  1 openlens-bin                             (Build Files Exist)
==> Packages to cleanBuild?
==> [N]one [A]ll [Ab]ort [I]nstalled [No]tInstalled or (1 2 3, 1-3, ^4)
==>A

dleitz42 commented on 2023-04-19 13:54 (UTC) (edited on 2023-04-19 13:55 (UTC) by dleitz42)

Hi beliys, the release files on https://github.com/beliys/OpenLens/releases/tag/v6.4.15 have been changed. Now the checksums are invalid. Here the changes for PKGBUILD: 

- sha256sums_x86_64=('b6708fd0f5404898497e8b2c1f5f726977a2901322082aa4a8fd86a3a1d4f8d8')
- sha256sums_aarch64=('2caec249ea59a27c743d280bb1817f5dc35ce217048b8732d84340a59b9cf528')

+ sha256sums_x86_64=('37341e8e7db585fbbfa03ea7a00fa488dc6bbcfc5ab6d82bf22327d4b0732e78')
+ sha256sums_aarch64=('de0f4405714dc2d72892485a8ca8932251c540937e9525ffdb95468e797a60a7')

Unim8trix commented on 2023-04-18 12:07 (UTC)

Hi, can you please fix the checksums for the appimages as they seems not correct. The sums from the openlens repo with PKGBUILD are different

bko commented on 2023-04-04 08:35 (UTC)

Are you using conda?

https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2061695

rgaiacs commented on 2023-04-04 08:09 (UTC) (edited on 2023-04-29 16:24 (UTC) by rgaiacs)

RESOLVED by disable conda.

I got the following error

==> Creating package "openlens-bin"...
  -> Generating .PKGINFO file...
  -> Generating .BUILDINFO file...
  -> Generating .MTREE file...
  -> Compressing package...
bsdtar: Option --no-read-sparse is not supported
Usage:
  List:    bsdtar -tf <archive-filename>
  Extract: bsdtar -xf <archive-filename>
  Create:  bsdtar -cf <archive-filename> [filenames...]
  Help:    bsdtar --help
==> ERROR: Failed to create package file.
 -> error making: openlens-bin

bko commented on 2023-01-20 10:27 (UTC) (edited on 2023-01-20 10:28 (UTC) by bko)

Currently there are 2 problems:

1) with each build, the checksum changes

2) sometimes the GITHUB API does not return what it should. That is why 2 days ago the API returned 6.3.0 as the latest version, although it should have returned 6.4.0-alpha.3, and because of this, the package was rebuilt and the checksum changed.

This can be fixed in 2 ways:

1) just ignore the checksum check

2) make changes to minimize problems in the future.

I don’t really like the first option, but those who are more suitable for it can skip the checksum check during installation and there will be no problems.

But I try to go the second way doing it in my free time. If someone knows how to do better, then patches are welcome. In the MuhammedKalkan repository, the problem of rebuilding and changing checksums is much more common, at least due to the fact that receiving an empty response from the github api is not validated there.

ruakij commented on 2023-01-20 09:03 (UTC) (edited on 2023-01-20 09:04 (UTC) by ruakij) 

==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
    OpenLens.desktop ... Passed
==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha256sums...
    OpenLens-6.3.0-x86_64.AppImage ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

I checked the sha256sum: ef6ab3b301e54a4df7ccf50dd566bbbdc1187370844550008c6b0896153a0253 OpenLens-6.3.0.x86_64.AppImage

And unfortunately even though your releases might be automateable, the new version is pretty buggy and theother release-repo has therefore removed it. This package is just not reliable like this.

1 2 3 Next › Last »