Search Criteria
Package Details: openshift-client-bin 4.17.5-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/openshift-client-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | openshift-client-bin |
Description: | Client tools for OpenShift, binary release |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/openshift/oc |
Licenses: | Apache |
Conflicts: | okd-client-bin, origin-client, origin-client-bin |
Provides: | oc |
Submitter: | erdii |
Maintainer: | erdii |
Last Packager: | erdii |
Votes: | 5 |
Popularity: | 0.26 |
First Submitted: | 2021-02-19 14:43 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-27 10:37 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
alwyn commented on 2023-05-13 09:58 (UTC)
@johnhamelink, that's odd, I've used it both with and without having kubectl installed and didn't experience any issues. Can you elaborate on the problem you are having?
johnhamelink commented on 2023-05-04 15:35 (UTC)
Hi there,
I was having issues using this package as-is because the kubectl binary that oc expects is not installed by default. This is probably fine, but it might be worth mentioning this somewhere to avoid confusion for those of us who already had a kubectl binary installed?
chmouel commented on 2021-12-19 20:25 (UTC)
latest openshift releases are 4.9.x
what about using binaries from :
https://mirror.openshift.com/pub/openshift-v4/clients/ocp/latest/
instead?
erdii commented on 2021-05-15 12:46 (UTC)
@twelveeighty thanks for pointing out! I moved the oc binary to
/usr/bin/oc
.twelveeighty commented on 2021-05-13 14:21 (UTC)
Is there a specific reason this package installs oc in /usr/local/bin? It is against the Arch packaging standards [1]? Can this be changed to /usr/bin?
[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_package_guidelines#Package_etiquette
alwyn commented on 2021-04-01 21:19 (UTC)
@erdii, it does not actually. I'm not sure what is the cause of this. If I source the completion file it works fine, but it doesn't seem to load when it's just in my
fpath
. I'm not having much luck debugging why zsh does this. As mentioned, every other completion works fine...erdii commented on 2021-03-29 07:51 (UTC) (edited on 2021-03-29 08:08 (UTC) by erdii)
@alwyn does it work for you with the diff? Edit: issue filed at https://github.com/openshift/oc/issues/792
alwyn commented on 2021-03-27 21:04 (UTC)
@erdii that diff looks good to me.
That's weird! It seems to work sometimes for me, but doesn't most of the time. Maybe I need to debug my zsh completions in general. Still, it's odd because every other completion works fine.
erdii commented on 2021-03-27 15:28 (UTC)
@alwyn I've had a look and think that
oc comletion zsh
should propably replace ALL occurrences ofkubectl
withoc
. Strangely enough this faulty generation does not break completion for me.I've also had a look into https://github.com/openshift/oc but I couldn't find the root cause of the faulty generation. Please feel free to open an issue with them. :)
What do you think about this hacky patch until an upstream has landed? https://gist.github.com/erdii/dd51c37e16f54b1ddac3a4dc6c9f3b15
alwyn commented on 2021-03-26 22:10 (UTC) (edited on 2021-03-26 22:11 (UTC) by alwyn)
@erdii :thumbsup:
With the current oc client,
oc completion zsh
will output#compdef kubectl
instead of#compdef oc
, and this breaks my completions... Maybe we can add ased
inpackage()
? Or we can poke upstream about this. You work at RedHat, right? ;)1 2 Next › Last »