Package Details: openssl098 0.9.8.zh-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/openssl098.git (read-only)
Package Base: openssl098
Description: The Open Source toolkit for Secure Sockets Layer and Transport Layer Security (0.9.8 branch)
Upstream URL: https://www.openssl.org
Licenses: custom:BSD
Conflicts: openssl-compatibility
Provides: openssl-compatibility
Submitter: yejun
Maintainer: eworm
Last Packager: eworm
Votes: 283
Popularity: 0.157282
First Submitted: 2010-09-06 08:48
Last Updated: 2016-02-13 21:06

Latest Comments

nakano commented on 2016-07-18 13:33

As stated in other comments below, to import a key, you should use the --recv-keys argument:

$ gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-keys D5E9E43F7DF9EE8C

Forum_Liker commented on 2016-05-13 16:07

new problem

openssl-0.9.8zh.tar.gz ... FAILED (unknown public key D5E9E43F7DF9EE8C)

$ gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --search-keys D5E9E43F7DF9EE8C
gpg: no keyserver known (use option --keyserver)
gpg: keyserver search failed: No keyserver available

eworm commented on 2016-04-04 18:05

I do not include header files by intention. When compiling packages you should link against current stable version, openssl from [core] in this case.

Any reason you want legacy versions instead of currently maintained code?

brauliobo commented on 2016-04-04 14:41

could you please include files at /usr/include/openssl098? this is necessary to compile other packages like ruby

Forum_Liker commented on 2016-03-15 11:58

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
openssl-0.9.8zh.tar.gz ... FAILED (unknown public key D5E9E43F7DF9EE8C)
==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build openssl098.
==> Restart building openssl098 ? [y/N]

gpg --recv-keys D5E9E43F7DF9EE8C
gpg: keyserver receive failed: No keyserver available
-----------------------------------------
gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --search-keys D5E9E43F7DF9EE8C

matthewprenger commented on 2016-02-13 21:19

Works great now, thanks!

eworm commented on 2016-02-13 21:02

Ah, I used my locally stored files. Looks like the openssl guys re-signed their files with a new key.
I will upload a new PKGBUILD in a few minutes.

matthewprenger commented on 2016-02-13 20:55

Thats the unknown key yaourt gave me when trying to install the package:

openssl-0.9.8zh.tar.gz ... FAILED (unknown public key D5E9E43F7DF9EE8C)

Edit: Importing D9C4D26D0E604491 gives me the same unknown public key error from above.

eworm commented on 2016-02-13 20:52

Looks like you imported the wrong key. Where did you get the fingerprint?
You need to import D9C4D26D0E604491.

matthewprenger commented on 2016-02-13 20:29

Ok so after importing the D5E9E43F7DF9EE8C key, I get an 'invalid public key' error when installing this package.

eworm commented on 2015-05-18 07:50

The signature is not invalid, the public key is unknown.
Others had the same problem, you should read older comment below. Just run:

gpg --recv-keys D9C4D26D0E604491

And try again.

killajoe commented on 2015-05-18 07:50

gpg --recv-keys D9C4D26D0E604491 solved... sorry..

killajoe commented on 2015-05-18 07:47

==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
openssl-0.9.8zf.tar.gz ... Passed
openssl-0.9.8zf.tar.gz.asc ... Skipped
no-rpath.patch ... Passed
ca-dir.patch ... Passed
==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
openssl-0.9.8zf.tar.gz ... FAILED (unknown public key D9C4D26D0E604491)
==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build openssl098.

eworm commented on 2015-05-18 07:39

And another check... Checksum is ok and GPG signature is valid.
What exactly is your issue?

killajoe commented on 2015-05-18 07:32

ups ... PGP signature is not valid...?

killajoe commented on 2015-05-18 07:28

sha256sums=('d5245a29128984192acc5b1fc01e37429b7a01c53cadcb2645e546718b300edb'
'SKIP'
'754d6107a306311e15a1db6a1cc031b81691c8b9865e8809ac60ca6f184c957c'
'9e8126f3a748f4c1d6fe34d4436de72b16a40e97a6d18234d2e88caa179d50c4')

eworm commented on 2015-03-31 06:23

Just checked again... The checksum is correct.

wilberfan commented on 2015-03-31 01:43

==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
openssl098-0.9.8.zf.tar.gz ... FAILED
no-rpath.patch ... Passed
ca-dir.patch ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

eworm commented on 2015-03-02 19:43

Uh... What?! There is no openssl 0.9.8zf... Version 0.9.8ze is the latest stable in 0.9.8 branch, no?

FadeMind commented on 2015-03-02 19:08

FIXED PKGBUILD for openssl098zf with working source URL.

https://pastebin.com/w6fZ6Rxa

tesfabpel commented on 2015-01-09 09:14

Thanks it worked!
I've put the keyserver in the ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf

eworm commented on 2015-01-09 09:03

Add a keyserver... To ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf or the command:

gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-keys D9C4D26D0E604491

tesfabpel commented on 2015-01-09 09:00

It doesn't work for me:

gpg --recv-keys D9C4D26D0E604491
gpg: No keyserver available

(as root and as user)

I've tried with pacman-key and it fetches the key (but yaourt needs the key from gpg, not from pacman-key)

keepitsimpleengr commented on 2015-01-08 18:56

"gpg --recv-keys D9C4D26D0E604491 " worked, thanks

eworm commented on 2015-01-08 18:41

gpg --recv-keys D9C4D26D0E604491

keepitsimpleengr commented on 2015-01-08 18:37

PKGBUILD apparently not getting correct key from
https://www.openssl.org/source/

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
openssl-0.9.8zd.tar.gz ... FAILED (unknown public key D9C4D26D0E604491)
==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build openssl098.

trya commented on 2014-06-05 18:47

Orphaned. eworm should take over maintenance.

eworm commented on 2014-02-17 19:06

Oh, and I have to modify the Makefile to successfully cross compile. Can we get this into the PKGBUILD as well?

This is my supposed patch:
http://www.eworm.de/download/linux/openssl098.patch

Thanks!

eworm commented on 2014-02-17 18:53

I have some stupid Cisco hardware that needs PKCS#12 files to be uplaoded for certificate import. For any reason the Cisco devices fail with files generated from latest openssl (1.0.x). Everything works just fine using an old openssl version (0.9.8). Had to use an old Debian system... Any chance we get the openssl binary itself into this package as /usr/bin/openssl098?

markhadman commented on 2012-08-31 17:48

Thankyou, Trya. Working now.
It seems that to install the latest Spotify, I have to first uninstall the old one, as these libraries came bundled with it.

[mark@xxxxx ~]$ pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8
/usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 is owned by spotify 0.6.2.291-4
[mark@xxxxx ~]$ sudo pacman -R spotify

trya commented on 2012-08-31 13:55

@markhadman: pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8

markhadman commented on 2012-08-31 12:02

error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
openssl098: /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 exists in filesystem
openssl098: /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 exists in filesystem
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.

Revelation60 commented on 2012-07-13 15:31

I occured to me the first time the installer tries to download the package.

trya commented on 2012-06-22 21:15

@scenox: when does it occur?

Anonymous comment on 2012-06-22 19:54

I get the following error:
curl: (56) SSL read: error:1408F119:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:decryption failed or bad record mac, errno 0

trya commented on 2012-03-24 20:57

@xhochy: not that I don't want to include this patch, but I try to stay as close as the openssl package from [core], and upstream still doesn't include version information. You should report a bug to https://bugs.archlinux.org or ask devs on the arch-dev-general mailing list first if you'd like to see this patch integrated. If Arch adopt it, I will.

trya commented on 2012-03-24 15:34

@xhochy: not that I don't want to include this patch, but I try to stay as close as the openssl package from [core], and upstream still doesn't include version information. You should report a bug to https://bugs.archlinux.org or ask to arch-dev-general first if you'd like to see this patch integrated. If Arch adopt it, I will.

trya commented on 2012-03-24 15:33

@xhochy: not that I don't want to include this patch, but I try to stay as close as the openssl package from [core], and upstream still doesn't include version information. You should report a bug to http://bugs.archlinux.org or ask to arch-dev-general first if you'd like to see this patch integrated. If Arch adopt it, I will.

pyther commented on 2012-03-24 13:27

I would also like to see the versioning patch added. Thanks

xhochy commented on 2012-03-23 18:01

The current build lacks version information the libraries.

A version of this package with those is available in my github repo: https://github.com/xhochy/archlinux-pkgbuilds/tree/master/openssl098

Fixed this using http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1222&user=guest&pass=guest and the debian package.

yejun commented on 2010-11-04 18:34

This is really not for long term use because openssl 0.9.8 itself is outdated. You'd better find updated packages not depends on this.

petRUShka commented on 2010-11-04 08:59

Very strange version. Because of it every time when I make yaourt -Suy --aur I see following:
aur/openssl098 0.9.8.o-1 -> 0.9.8o/[a-z]/.0.9.8o//[0-9.]/}}-
So, openssl098 try to upgrade every whole system upgrade.