Package Details: p4 2024.2.2675662-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/p4.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: p4
Description: Perforce's Helix command-line client
Upstream URL: https://www.perforce.com
Keywords: p4 perforce
Licenses: custom:p4
Submitter: queueRAM
Maintainer: meepzh
Last Packager: meepzh
Votes: 30
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2009-09-10 01:45 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-28 05:43 (UTC)

Dependencies (1)

Required by (1)

Sources (3)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »

ByReaL commented on 2019-04-02 16:40 (UTC)

i can adopt it, how would you like to go about it? usually it's easy if package is orphan but this one is still flagged as active.

peder2tm commented on 2019-04-01 18:30 (UTC)

Feel free to adopt the package. I stopped using perforce so I am not really interested in maintaining the package.

ByReaL commented on 2019-04-01 18:16 (UTC)

ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

jshap commented on 2019-01-14 21:24 (UTC)

hey @peder2tm, I think you applied the patch to bump the version to 2018.2.1660568 but forgot to update the .SRCINFO (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/.SRCINFO) so an update was never published.

jshap commented on 2018-12-19 19:45 (UTC)

PKGBUILD should be updated with: https://gist.github.com/jshap70/42319cf6745609d1167256d6c58dcc16

WhittlesJr commented on 2017-08-08 17:41 (UTC)

Flagged. I'm wondering if it's worth dropping the checksums... this goes out of date constantly. Or could there be a programatic way of getting the checksums out of the SHA256SUMS file?

Kunda commented on 2017-07-30 12:39 (UTC) (edited on 2017-07-30 12:39 (UTC) by Kunda)

ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! --<snip>-- ==> Making package: p4 2016.2.1509269-1 (Sun Jul 30 08:37:37 EDT 2017) ==> Checking runtime dependencies... ==> Checking buildtime dependencies... ==> Retrieving sources... -> Downloading p4... -> Found LICENSE ==> Validating source files with sha256sums... p4 ... FAILED LICENSE ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

WhittlesJr commented on 2017-05-10 17:45 (UTC)

New version: 5909816b545ae32ad7cfa2808213518a917f353a20135301026dbcde71465c0c (x86_64)

RZG commented on 2017-01-18 09:28 (UTC)

New versions: 71296ca755ff4eb1b28403637514b8d340fcfd857e16e3a3131f5a69eab52fab (x86_64)

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »