Search Criteria
Package Details: pacdef 1.6.0-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/pacdef.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | pacdef |
Description: | multi-backend declarative package manager for Linux |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/steven-omaha/pacdef |
Licenses: | GPL3 |
Submitter: | solnce |
Maintainer: | solnce |
Last Packager: | solnce |
Votes: | 6 |
Popularity: | 0.006322 |
First Submitted: | 2021-01-22 13:14 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-04-13 10:11 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc11-libsAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
- rust (rust-nightlyAUR, rustup-gitAUR, rust-nightly-binAUR, rust-gitAUR, rust-beta-binAUR, rustup-stubAUR, rustup) (make)
Latest Comments
solnce commented on 2024-11-30 20:44 (UTC)
@tvandermolen
The deletion request may seem appropriate, but is currently premature. A sudden influx of pressing RL issues has been preventing me from tending to pacdef. That's unlikely to change in the foreseeable future, unfortunately.
Nevertheless, pacdef should be installable with a frozen lock file. Therefore IMO deletion is not warranted.
But I'm quite happy that someone forked this project to keep it going. Best of luck to the new maintainers.
tvandermolen commented on 2024-11-30 20:37 (UTC)
This project seems to be abandoned. There has been no GitHub activity from the dev since May, and no response to 2-month old Issue #90 about an outdated dependency, which chrpinedo mentioned here.
Some others forked this and created metapac, which is also on AUR.
chrpinedo commented on 2024-10-17 20:16 (UTC)
I have this error...
solnce commented on 2024-01-30 11:49 (UTC) (edited on 2024-01-30 11:49 (UTC) by solnce)
@mwaddoups see https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Makepkg#Usage
pkgconf
is provided bybase-devel
mwaddoups commented on 2024-01-29 22:56 (UTC)
I think this package has a dependency (may just be build) on pkg-config?
I got a build error below
This was resolved by installing
pkgconf
.MaximGun commented on 2023-06-01 13:45 (UTC)
This builds fine on aarch64. Worth updating the PKGBUILD.
solnce commented on 2022-08-27 15:40 (UTC)
Yes, I did it a couple of times.
lmbbrkr commented on 2022-08-27 15:33 (UTC)
Have you tried running it a second time? pip caches stuff in
~/.cache/pip
(which you likely already had in your "normal" $HOME from previous build). First run will be slower regardless.solnce commented on 2022-08-26 20:13 (UTC)
Thanks for your input! I wasn't aware of that option. I tried it, and it leads to increased build times for me (from 7 to 10 seconds), therefore I am not going to apply that.
If it's possible to achieve the same thing without the increase in build time, please let me know.
lmbbrkr commented on 2022-08-26 19:21 (UTC)
Probably a good idea to use
HOME=/tmp pip install ...
so pip doesn't read user's pip.conf, as havinguser = yes
results it installing in~/.local
.