Package Details: pacolog 2.2.1-3

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pacolog.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pacolog
Description: List recent commits for Arch Linux packages
Upstream URL: https://gitlab.com/protist/pacolog
Licenses: GPL-3.0-only
Submitter: Rhinoceros
Maintainer: Rhinoceros
Last Packager: Rhinoceros
Votes: 55
Popularity: 0.25
First Submitted: 2016-06-23 03:54 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-02-03 11:36 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2

Rhinoceros commented on 2023-04-29 11:35 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. paclog was actually the original name of this package, and I changed it due to conflicts with pacutils (as per the newer comments on the paclog page). I'll remove the conflicts now, since it's been seven years since the original paclog!

Vedun commented on 2023-04-29 11:05 (UTC) (edited on 2023-04-29 11:18 (UTC) by Vedun)

The conflict with paclog is a bug in PKGBUILD.
You need to fix this and remove paclog from there.

Rhinoceros commented on 2016-06-23 21:50 (UTC)

Oops! Should be fixed now. Thanks for the message.

cryzed commented on 2016-06-23 19:54 (UTC)

==> Validating source files with sha256sums... v1.1.2.tar.gz ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! :: failed to verify pacolog integrity Seems like you forgot to run updpkgsums!

Rhinoceros commented on 2016-06-23 04:26 (UTC)

paclog has been renamed upstream to pacolog, and this package has been migrated.

Rhinoceros commented on 2016-06-08 01:09 (UTC)

Ah, I mean it makes sense for the upstream name to change too, especially since the other project predates this one. And paclog2 isn't the catchiest… :) I'm thinking something like pacolog (PAcman COmmit LOG), or paccolog, but that's less attractive IMO.

cryzed commented on 2016-06-08 00:53 (UTC)

@Rhinoceros Awesome! I'll check regularly for any changes and then install it properly. Simply calling it "paclog2" or some such would not be an option? I think it would be in the same vein as this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crypt_%28Unix%29#Relationship_to_password_hash_function for example.

Rhinoceros commented on 2016-06-07 12:02 (UTC)

@cryzed Arrgghhh… thanks for the heads up! I'll have to redo the hardest part of any coder's job — thinking of a new name! Thank you for letting me know. I'll try and think of a new name in the next few days.

cryzed commented on 2016-06-07 11:58 (UTC)

Hey, this is really cool -- unfortunately the paclog executable conflicts with pacutil's (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pacutils/) paclog -- just a heads up. For now I'll simply adjust your PKGBUILD so it works for me.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2