Package Details: pacserve 2021-4

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pacserve.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pacserve
Description: Easily share Pacman packages between computers. A replacement for PkgD.
Upstream URL: https://xyne.dev/projects/pacserve
Keywords: arch_linux pacman server
Licenses: GPL
Conflicts: pacredir
Submitter: Xyne
Maintainer: Xyne
Last Packager: Xyne
Votes: 110
Popularity: 0.072857
First Submitted: 2011-04-17 00:30 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2022-07-15 22:46 (UTC)

Dependencies (5)

Required by (0)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 14 Next › Last »

lcartercondon commented on 2015-01-30 00:08 (UTC)

==> Retrieving sources... -> Found pacserve-2015.tar.xz -> Found pacserve-2015.tar.xz.sig ==> Validating source files with md5sums... pacserve-2015.tar.xz ... Passed pacserve-2015.tar.xz.sig ... Passed ==> Validating source files with sha512sums... pacserve-2015.tar.xz ... Passed pacserve-2015.tar.xz.sig ... Passed ==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg... pacserve-2015.tar.xz ... FAILED (unknown public key 1D1F0DC78F173680) ==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified! I see the previous comment about updating the upstream signature but I am still getting this error.

olebowle commented on 2015-01-20 23:31 (UTC)

Could you please remove ExecRestart from the pacserve-ports.service file, as it's long gone. The error message is: [/usr/lib/systemd/system/pacserve-ports.service:15] Unknown lvalue 'ExecRestart' in section 'Service'

Xyne commented on 2015-01-15 05:31 (UTC)

I have updated the upstream signature.

asdil12 commented on 2015-01-10 00:01 (UTC)

gpg reports that the files are not signed with EC3CBE7F607D11E663149E811D1F0DC78F173680 but with 4A8B17E20B88ACA61860009B5CED81B7C2E5C0D2 $ gpg --verify pacserve-2013.9.tar.xz.sig gpg: assuming signed data in 'pacserve-2013.9.tar.xz' gpg: Signature made Tue Sep 17 10:26:20 2013 CEST using RSA key ID C2E5C0D2 gpg: Good signature from "Xyne. <xyne@archlinux.ca>" [unknown] gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 4A8B 17E2 0B88 ACA6 1860 009B 5CED 81B7 C2E5 C0D2

Xyne commented on 2015-01-07 00:44 (UTC)

@asdil12 The signature is already in the validpgpkeys array. You should have checked before flagging the package. Check the discussion in the comments on the pkg_scripts page for instructions to eliminate the error.

asdil12 commented on 2015-01-03 19:41 (UTC)

==> Validating source files with sha512sums... pacserve-2013.9.tar.xz ... Passed pacserve-2013.9.tar.xz.sig ... Passed ==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg... pacserve-2013.9.tar.xz ... FAILED (unknown public key 5CED81B7C2E5C0D2) ==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified! I think you need to define the GPG key fingerprint in the validpgpkeys array: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#validpgpkeys

Xyne commented on 2014-11-01 16:37 (UTC)

@untitaker It seems that you have deleted the "ACCEPT" target on that machine. I recommend that you restore it.

untitaker commented on 2014-10-30 21:24 (UTC)

Since a while i had a mysterious failure of "pacserve-ports open": running "iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 15678 -j ACCEPT" running "iptables -A INPUT -p udp -m pkttype --pkt-type multicast --dport 15679 -j ACCEPT" iptables: No chain/target/match by that name. Funnily this happens on only one system.

Xyne commented on 2014-04-05 13:17 (UTC)

> Just _rebuild_ the necessary packages. You need to do this manually for all python packages from the AUR. This. It is the user's responsibility to rebuild AUR packages against new packages in the official repos. You could also enable the repo on my site to install all of my packages directly with pacman without worrying about manual rebuilds.

lahwaacz commented on 2014-04-04 21:25 (UTC)

Just _rebuild_ the necessary packages. You need to do this manually for all python packages from the AUR.