Package Details: pam-selinux 1.3.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pam-selinux.git (read-only)
Package Base: pam-selinux
Description: SELinux aware PAM (Pluggable Authentication Modules) library
Upstream URL: http://linux-pam.org
Keywords: selinux
Licenses: GPL2
Groups: selinux
Conflicts: pam, selinux-pam
Provides: pam=1.3.1-1, selinux-pam=1.3.1-1
Submitter: Siosm
Maintainer: IooNag
Last Packager: IooNag
Votes: 20
Popularity: 0.000143
First Submitted: 2013-11-03 20:05
Last Updated: 2018-07-01 14:45

Required by (275)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »

xangelux commented on 2013-02-09 19:29

I just sended a mail to the SELinux mailing list, I hope they respond soon.

Nicky726 commented on 2013-02-09 19:26

Hm, I already had the pam_namespace-build-1.1.6.patch, but the pam-1.1.6-install-empty.patch seems it could make it past make install. However, with autoreconf in the PKGBUILD it fails during autoreconf call as xangelux noted and without autoreconf in it the second patch seems not to be taken in acount, that is DESTDIR is for some files ignored and make install fails. I do not understand it on that level, so I am still stuck.

xangelux commented on 2013-02-09 17:46

@Siosm: it doesn't build, the clasic warning about configure.in should be .ac, the AC_LANG_CONFTEST instead of AC_LANG_SOURCE and one error:

parallel-tests: error: required file 'build-aux/test-driver' not found

xangelux commented on 2013-02-09 17:32

Should I test it? I mean, will it break my system or just make it uncofortable if it doesn't work?

Siosm commented on 2013-02-09 13:26

@xangelux: You can try the PKGBUILD and the patches (some from Fedora) available here: https://git.siosm.fr/siosm-selinux/tree/selinux-pam?h=untested

WARNING: I have NOT tested it yet!

xangelux commented on 2013-02-09 07:53

I've been looking for an answer, but no luck, any luck in your part?

Nicky726 commented on 2012-11-18 18:26

OK, so with version 1.1.6 I managed to get the pam build with a patch from Fedora, but the build of pam_unix2 fails. That seems to be SELinux specific, but Fedora does not use it, so I don't know where to look for patches. From what I read in the bugzilla thread, it could be omitted. In that case I just hit problem in make install of pam, when it tries to create a directory in /var/run. I'll try to figure out what options to send to make or make install so that it creates the directory in $pkgdir.

Anonymous comment on 2012-11-12 22:13

The issue still not fix, i tried two patch.

Nicky726 commented on 2012-07-20 06:17

Hi, I reported a bug because of that: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30645 Please try it there, as it concerns the [core] version too and is not SELinux specific.

xangelux commented on 2012-07-19 23:02

I think I found a patch here, http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/31245/ but someone says there needs to be a sign of some sort, what do you think?