Search Criteria
Package Details: pandoc-crossref-bin 0.3.18.0.b-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/pandoc-crossref-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | pandoc-crossref-bin |
Description: | Pandoc filter for cross-references - executable only |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/lierdakil/pandoc-crossref/ |
Keywords: | crossref pandoc |
Licenses: | GPL-2.0-or-later |
Conflicts: | pandoc-crossref |
Provides: | pandoc-crossref |
Submitter: | eNV25 |
Maintainer: | eNV25 (a821) |
Last Packager: | a821 |
Votes: | 8 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2022-02-03 15:11 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-10-14 06:25 (UTC) |
Dependencies (1)
- pandoc (pandoc-sile-gitAUR, pandoc-static-gitAUR, pandoc-binAUR, pandoc-cli)
Required by (3)
- diplib-git (requires pandoc-crossref) (optional)
- pandoc-bin (requires pandoc-crossref) (optional)
- pandoc-sile-git (requires pandoc-crossref) (optional)
Latest Comments
eNV25 commented on 2022-03-05 04:48 (UTC)
Fixed
shirshendu commented on 2022-03-04 10:20 (UTC) (edited on 2022-03-04 10:27 (UTC) by shirshendu)
Tried to install pandoc-crossref in Manjaro 21.2.4; pandoc-crossref-0.3.12.2a.tar.xz fails check. Probably the sha512sum should be updated.
eNV25 commented on 2022-02-05 05:03 (UTC)
I don't think I can make it
depends=(pandoc)
, but I can probably make itdepends=("pandoc>=${_pandoc_pkgver}")
. pandoc-crossref's binary releases are compiled for specific versions of pandoc. The current version of community/pandoc is2.14.2
but aur/pandoc-bin is2.17.0.1
. Do you think it should use '>=' or '='?If you want to use pandoc-crossref with community/pandoc you should probably use community/pandoc-crossref. If you want to use a custom pandoc you should probably compile pandoc-crossref yourself. Maybe aur/pandoc-crossref can be made?
I got the following warning message when I tried to use aur/pandoc-crossref-bin with community/pandoc:
alerque commented on 2022-02-03 20:57 (UTC)
Can you please change the dependencies on this to be
depends=(pandoc)
? It is quite likely that people than want this -bin also want that one, but there are also other options. For example I have a Pandoc fork that also has AUR packages that provide pandoc that would work. The same goes forpandoc-git
which would also work.alerque commented on 2022-02-03 12:22 (UTC)
That "history" is useless, I'm sorry but Jason should know better than that how the AUR works.
I don't know what the actual history is but it probably revolves around duplicates and somebody's choice of which direction to merge. Note that the official packages have also changed names from being prefixed with Haskell to dropping said prefix, so this was probably done at a time when they matched.
I suggest reviving the "plain" name which does make more sense. You can do so by cloning the git repo, replacing the contents with this PKGBUILD (after renaming the pkgname of course), then uploading it as a new commit. Once the new commit comes across the AUR page for it should revive. Then you can file a merge request to have this package merged into that one (which will bring votes and comments as such). Lastly once the merge is done you should bump the pkgrel and add provides/conflicts/replaces for this old name and remove them what is now the canonical name.
jadelord commented on 2022-02-03 11:26 (UTC)
Thankx eNV25. For some history: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=247339
eNV25 commented on 2022-02-03 11:18 (UTC) (edited on 2022-02-03 11:19 (UTC) by eNV25)
I picked with package up because I thought it wouldn't be too hard to maintain.
I don't know why this package is called
haskell-pandoc-crossref-bin
and notpandoc-crossref-bin
.pandoc-crossref-bin
doesn't exist and the community package is calledpandoc-crossref
.ryshglene commented on 2021-04-04 15:01 (UTC)
Looks like it is now possible to update.
jadelord commented on 2021-03-24 09:13 (UTC)
I am willing to update this package, but I am waiting for
pandoc-bin
to update. Otherwise I might break compatibility.