Package Details: pandoc-rstudio 1.13.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pandoc-rstudio.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pandoc-rstudio
Description: Links in /usr/bin to the prebuilt binaries bundled with rstudio
Upstream URL: http://www.pandoc.org/
Licenses: GPL
Conflicts: haskell-pandoc
Provides: haskell-pandoc
Submitter: tstenner
Maintainer: tstenner
Last Packager: tstenner
Votes: 8
Popularity: 0.000054
First Submitted: 2015-02-05 11:11 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2015-06-15 18:21 (UTC)

Dependencies (1)

Required by (0)

Sources (0)

Latest Comments

ilario commented on 2020-01-14 14:32 (UTC)

Installing this package and the rstudio-desktop-bin package, resulted in a symbolic link loop. The links this package creates in /usr/bin point to RStudio files which are links to the /usr/bin files. https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=rstudio-desktop-bin&id=47cb4af427ef#n83

leonardof commented on 2017-06-24 23:01 (UTC)

Maybe the package should provide (and conflict with) pandoc and pandoc-citeproc, instead of haskell-pandoc.

chendaniely commented on 2015-09-03 23:37 (UTC)

Sorry my last comment made no sense. The issue is fixed if arch users install pandoc separately using either the pandoc-bin or pandoc-static aur packages, and then deleting the pandoc binaries that ship with rstudio and create softlinks in the rstudio bin directory to the system install pandoc. I posted a solution here: https://github.com/rstudio/rmarkdown/issues/498#issuecomment-134683458 if pandoc does not work, it can also be installed using cabal: https://github.com/rstudio/rmarkdown/issues/498#issuecomment-135406169 I'm not sure how you want to handle this in this aur package, otherwise this comment and my original comment should hopefully be enough for future users.

tstenner commented on 2015-08-26 09:09 (UTC)

The binary supplied with rstudio has the same problem, unfortunately I can't fix it. Until the problem is resolved, you should use another binary package for pandoc.

chendaniely commented on 2015-08-25 17:45 (UTC)

please see discussion: https://github.com/rstudio/rmarkdown/issues/498