Package Details: paraview 5.2.0-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/paraview.git (read-only)
Package Base: paraview
Description: Parallel Visualization Application using VTK
Upstream URL: http://www.paraview.org
Licenses: custom
Submitter: stephane
Maintainer: deezy (eolianoe)
Last Packager: eolianoe
Votes: 59
Popularity: 1.799479
First Submitted: 2012-12-11 01:37
Last Updated: 2016-12-02 14:42

Latest Comments

eolianoe commented on 2016-11-28 16:35

In case you want more features that are not enabled in this package (for instance due to library conflicts), you can look at the binary package [a] or at the new superbuild package [b].

[a] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/paraview-bin/
[b] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/paraview-superbuild/

GloW commented on 2016-11-27 21:17

yes, no data are loaded until you hit apply, paraview need data to give you available filters.

@juliohm, in case the package is unstable, you can use the binaries or compile yourself, both are quite stable.

lahwaacz commented on 2016-11-27 20:57

I've only used Paraview from this package, so I don't really know.

juliohm commented on 2016-11-27 15:21

Indeed @Iahwaacz, thank you for sharing. Is this expected behavior?

lahwaacz commented on 2016-11-26 22:08

All filters ungray themselves when I click on the "Apply" button in the "Properties" tab after loading a file.

juliohm commented on 2016-11-26 21:36

All the ParaView filters are disabled (grayish) in the current build. Could you please fix this? I am always afraid of updating this package, every time a new major issue.

juliohm commented on 2016-10-19 22:52

Thank you @eolianoe, will do.

eolianoe commented on 2016-10-19 20:37

@juliohm: This was fixed in 5.1.2-3, you can install the new version

juliohm commented on 2016-10-19 18:52

Sorry @deezy, I didn't receive a notification on my email when you commented. Fortunately, @eolianoe has answered your question. What is the current status of the issue? Can I reinstall ParaView?

eolianoe commented on 2016-10-14 07:42

@deep_thought: I can reproduce it in a clean chroot, so I think it's a missing dependency. I'll try to find which one it is.

All comments