Package Details: paru 2.0.3-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/paru.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: paru
Description: Feature packed AUR helper
Upstream URL: https://github.com/morganamilo/paru
Keywords: AUR helper pacman rust wrapper yay
Licenses: GPL-3.0-or-later
Submitter: Morganamilo
Maintainer: Morganamilo
Last Packager: Morganamilo
Votes: 896
Popularity: 29.02
First Submitted: 2020-10-19 00:43 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-03-26 04:28 (UTC)

Dependencies (6)

Sources (1)

Pinned Comments

haxie commented on 2023-05-26 17:45 (UTC)

you're better off contacting her via the github, this comments section is 90% "it's out of date" from people who didn't scroll down before posting

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 22 Next › Last »

yochananmarqos commented on 2023-04-09 22:56 (UTC)

@eclairevoyant: The Maintainer is not the only one who can unflag it. The user who flagged it out of date can also do so.

@k1gen: Unflag it, please. It is not of date.

batot commented on 2023-04-09 22:47 (UTC) (edited on 2023-04-09 22:48 (UTC) by batot)

Morganamilo it is owner 14 packages and I was checked for last 5 month not upgrade any packet!!!

@PolarianDev realy is it TU and nothing doing from many month? Nice joke - TU ;-)

PolarianDev commented on 2023-04-09 12:54 (UTC)

@eclairevoyant They are a TU, they could literally just take the package back...

eclairevoyant commented on 2023-04-09 12:52 (UTC)

@Morganamilo might want to unflag it as OOD since after the 6-month mark it'll automatically get orphaned if someone submits a request

batot commented on 2023-04-07 11:14 (UTC)

@Morganamilo can you give me access I have ready new version 1.11.2 to push.

TemplarGR commented on 2023-04-03 06:04 (UTC)

@AshMyzk, if that's the case, then the -bin version should have been 1.11.1-2, not 1.11.2, and on top of that, he should push for a rebuild version of this anyway for those of us who don't keep track of these things and use tools like yay and should have a rebuilt version with openssl3, don't you think?

AshMyzk commented on 2023-03-26 14:47 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-26 14:49 (UTC) by AshMyzk)

The 1.11.1 and 1.11.2 versions are basically the same. 1.11.2 is just a rebuilt version of 1.11.1 for openssl3. I think that's why the maintainer haven't updated this package.

6543 commented on 2023-03-16 22:34 (UTC)

@eclairevoyant ... it's riscv64 also rever to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/riscv/Makefile#n28 ;)

6543 commented on 2023-03-16 22:32 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-16 22:33 (UTC) by 6543)

well there exist riscv32 and riscv64 and this is mostly revered to the gc extensions ...

I have a VisionVive2 board -> riscv64; riscv32 boards for linux exist but they are not that common and almost all distros that target riscv target riscv64(gc) ...