@eclairevoyant: The Maintainer is not the only one who can unflag it. The user who flagged it out of date can also do so.
@k1gen: Unflag it, please. It is not of date.
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/paru.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | paru |
Description: | Feature packed AUR helper |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/morganamilo/paru |
Keywords: | AUR helper pacman rust wrapper yay |
Licenses: | GPL-3.0-or-later |
Submitter: | Morganamilo |
Maintainer: | Morganamilo |
Last Packager: | Morganamilo |
Votes: | 896 |
Popularity: | 29.02 |
First Submitted: | 2020-10-19 00:43 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-03-26 04:28 (UTC) |
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 22 Next › Last »
@eclairevoyant: The Maintainer is not the only one who can unflag it. The user who flagged it out of date can also do so.
@k1gen: Unflag it, please. It is not of date.
Morganamilo it is owner 14 packages and I was checked for last 5 month not upgrade any packet!!!
@PolarianDev realy is it TU and nothing doing from many month? Nice joke - TU ;-)
@eclairevoyant They are a TU, they could literally just take the package back...
@Morganamilo might want to unflag it as OOD since after the 6-month mark it'll automatically get orphaned if someone submits a request
@Morganamilo can you give me access I have ready new version 1.11.2 to push.
@AshMyzk, if that's the case, then the -bin version should have been 1.11.1-2, not 1.11.2, and on top of that, he should push for a rebuild version of this anyway for those of us who don't keep track of these things and use tools like yay and should have a rebuilt version with openssl3, don't you think?
The 1.11.1 and 1.11.2 versions are basically the same. 1.11.2 is just a rebuilt version of 1.11.1 for openssl3. I think that's why the maintainer haven't updated this package.
@eclairevoyant ... it's riscv64 also rever to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/riscv/Makefile#n28 ;)
well there exist riscv32 and riscv64 and this is mostly revered to the gc extensions ...
I have a VisionVive2 board -> riscv64; riscv32 boards for linux exist but they are not that common and almost all distros that target riscv target riscv64(gc) ...
Pinned Comments
haxie commented on 2023-05-26 17:45 (UTC)
you're better off contacting her via the github, this comments section is 90% "it's out of date" from people who didn't scroll down before posting