Search Criteria
Package Details: pcf-unifont-extra 17.0.05-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/pcf-unifont-extra.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | pcf-unifont-extra |
| Description: | GNU Unifont Glyphs (PCF version, bold and italic) |
| Upstream URL: | https://unifoundry.com/unifont/ |
| Keywords: | font |
| Licenses: | OFL-1.1 OR GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Font-exception-2.0 |
| Submitter: | neeshy |
| Maintainer: | neeshy |
| Last Packager: | neeshy |
| Votes: | 1 |
| Popularity: | 0.167376 |
| First Submitted: | 2022-07-09 00:03 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2026-06-29 01:38 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
dreieck commented on 2025-04-23 11:23 (UTC)
Ahoj,
please download the
LICENSE.txtfile to a filename which is distinct to this package.When the user has
$SRCDESTenvironment variable set, e.g. in/etc/makepkg.conf, all source files end up in the same directory, which leads to conflicts if other packages actually also do the same mistake of using generic filenames.To do so, prepend for example
${pkgname}-LICENSE.txt::to thesourceentry, so that it readsand adapt the installation command so that it uses
${pkgname}-LICENSE.txt:Current issue is that checksum verification fails because a
LICENS.txt, downloaded by some otherPKGBUILD, is already present:Regards and thanks for the package!
neeshy commented on 2023-11-13 17:04 (UTC)
Since these fonts are generated using
mkbold-mkitalic, it doesn't make sense to mix this with the base package. Plus, there's thebdf-unifont-extrapackage, and since I don't maintainbdf-unifont(i.e. I can't merge thebdf-versions), for consistency's sake it makes sense to keep this package separate as well.