Package Details: pcsx2-git 2.3.119.r1.g9e21ee1bc4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pcsx2-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pcsx2-git
Description: A Sony PlayStation 2 emulator
Upstream URL: https://github.com/PCSX2/pcsx2
Licenses: GPL-3.0+
Conflicts: pcsx2
Provides: pcsx2
Submitter: alucryd
Maintainer: weirdbeard (xiota)
Last Packager: weirdbeard
Votes: 130
Popularity: 0.084835
First Submitted: 2014-03-26 14:17 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-01-19 15:42 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

weirdbeard commented on 2024-08-17 03:40 (UTC)

https://github.com/PCSX2/pcsx2/pull/11632

This package now enables Cmake Package mode proper. PCSX2 will here on, be installed in the package standard folders /usr/bin, /usr/share, /usr/lib. Following the XDG standard pcsx2's config files remain in .config/PCSX2

In order to ensure a proper and clean upgrade. Uninstall this package COMPLETELY and clear cache before reinstalling.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 .. 67 Next › Last »

patlefort commented on 2024-08-17 06:08 (UTC)

The install file needs to be changed, it still points to the old install location.

weirdbeard commented on 2024-08-17 03:40 (UTC)

https://github.com/PCSX2/pcsx2/pull/11632

This package now enables Cmake Package mode proper. PCSX2 will here on, be installed in the package standard folders /usr/bin, /usr/share, /usr/lib. Following the XDG standard pcsx2's config files remain in .config/PCSX2

In order to ensure a proper and clean upgrade. Uninstall this package COMPLETELY and clear cache before reinstalling.

weirdbeard commented on 2024-06-11 04:50 (UTC)

I gotchu. It was more an attempt to better match the AppImage / Flatpak build scripts then anything else.

xiota commented on 2024-06-11 04:14 (UTC)

Packages generally shouldn't use ccache. Can interfere with reproducibility, mask packaging errors, etc.

weirdbeard commented on 2024-06-09 03:56 (UTC)

This package is fixed

weirdbeard commented on 2024-06-07 17:30 (UTC)

My only concern is it breaks in the future because of some change or, another. And we'll have to re-up the other pcsx2 package on this which is why I did the package style I did in the first place, lower maintenance cost on both fronts.

That said if you guys are absolutely adamantly certain this is the better way, that's fine.

xmusjackson commented on 2024-06-07 17:06 (UTC) (edited on 2024-06-07 17:07 (UTC) by xmusjackson)

@xiota Yeah, that was sort of my point. setcap is run in post_install, so if we use patchelf in build or install, setcap capabilities would not be removed. I like this approach though, set rpath, build lib with pcsx2, move it to opt with the binary, etc.

@weirdbeard, do you have any thoughts?

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 .. 67 Next › Last »