Package Details: pcsx2-git 2.3.10.r0.g5441c7ed59-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pcsx2-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pcsx2-git
Description: A Sony PlayStation 2 emulator
Upstream URL: https://github.com/PCSX2/pcsx2
Licenses: GPL-3.0+
Conflicts: pcsx2
Provides: pcsx2
Submitter: alucryd
Maintainer: weirdbeard (xiota)
Last Packager: weirdbeard
Votes: 130
Popularity: 0.34
First Submitted: 2014-03-26 14:17 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-08 23:36 (UTC)

Dependencies (32)

Required by (3)

Sources (8)

Pinned Comments

weirdbeard commented on 2024-08-17 03:40 (UTC)

https://github.com/PCSX2/pcsx2/pull/11632

This package now enables Cmake Package mode proper. PCSX2 will here on, be installed in the package standard folders /usr/bin, /usr/share, /usr/lib. Following the XDG standard pcsx2's config files remain in .config/PCSX2

In order to ensure a proper and clean upgrade. Uninstall this package COMPLETELY and clear cache before reinstalling.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 .. 66 Next › Last »

rafaelff commented on 2020-04-12 19:32 (UTC)

Adopting for trying to keep it maintained, although I don't play. If someone plays and wants to step up, feel free to e-mail me.

alucryd commented on 2020-04-12 18:52 (UTC)

Disowning, I'm more likely to use Play! in the future because it has a libretro core and it supports x86_64.

Gou commented on 2020-04-12 18:24 (UTC)

Just to note as I noticed the same issue as @Harpy1991 I was able to get the performance of this to be normal by actually specifying the build type, literally all I did was add -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release to cmake, hopefully this gets added to here so that automatic builds on repos actually perform well.

katt commented on 2019-11-03 15:12 (UTC)

I'm able to compile this with gcc 9.2.0-4 and without harfbuzz.

Kapshibergen commented on 2019-10-19 19:18 (UTC) (edited on 2019-10-19 19:18 (UTC) by Kapshibergen)

It turned out to compile only with gcc and adding -DDISABLE_ADVANCE_SIMD=ON

alucryd commented on 2019-08-30 12:17 (UTC)

It's true for no one, you just didn't set your build flags correctly https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Makepkg#Tips_and_tricks. With the correct flags, and when latest GCC works again you'll always get better performance using this package. As for flatpak and its "isolation", another word for it is overhead, plus there's nothing harmful about pcsx2 at all.

Harpy1991 commented on 2019-08-30 11:42 (UTC)

i dont know if this will be true to everybody. but the flatpak version has a way better performance under the same configurations. this one uses more of my cpu. its always with fans at maximum speed. and lower fps. i guess its the video plugin that comes with it, the flatpak has gsdx (gcc 8.3.0 sse4.1/avx) 1.1.0(libgsdx-sse4) i see no reason to use this when i have to compile and take the risk of doing damage to my computer, because i dont understand nothing on source code, while flatpak performes better and installs faster and runs isolated with less risks of harming my computer

rafaelff commented on 2019-08-19 14:17 (UTC)

@vovan93: I'm unable to reproduce the erro when building in clean chroot, it successfully builds in here. (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Building_in_a_clean_chroot)

vovan93 commented on 2019-08-19 01:28 (UTC)

Cannot install. Error in build() after 9%. https://pastebin.com/6RtyVawG

alucryd commented on 2019-08-17 15:02 (UTC)

Looks like none of this is going to be fixed soon so I just added all needed workarounds. Also disabled the zerogs plugin, it's no longer being worked on, and it allowed me to drop NVIDIA Cg as a dependency.