Arch Linux User Repository

@caleb: You make a valid argument. Point taken.

See Nonfree applications package guidelines:

Use the suffix -bin always unless you are sure there will never be a source-based package

In this case I'm pretty sure it's safe to say there will never be a source-based package, but there's nothing wrong with using the -bin suffix.

@yochananmarqos I actually really dislike that Arch packaging guidelines allow binary packages without -bin; I prefer to know up front when I search the AUR using yay --aur -Ss or similar tools whether a package I see is going to be a source build or an upstream binary. Last I checked the Arch guidelines allowed using -bin suffixes for these kind of things even if the sources was not available, it just doesn't require the -bin designation. Is that not still the case?

This should be called pdfstudio as there is no source code available; therefore no -bin designation is required.

Any way to use this app with the newest java without the top bar disappearing?

@Anonymo Please see the pinned comment, this package is obsolete and will not be updated (in fact it's scheduled for merger into the correct current package). I have bumped the pdfstudio-bin package to the latest release. Please feel free to flag that package as out of date in the future when you see *nix releases are available upstream. Thanks for the heads up.

2019.2.2 – April 27 2020 (macOS, Linux, Unix), Coming Soon (Windows) is out. Before Windows. LOL

@Anonymo This isn't out of date yet. The changelog link you sent says "coming soon" and the binary build files aren't posted yet. Please flag whet it's actually out.

Thanks, gonna change.

Just a note, the link you put is incorrect and goes to this package.

The correct link is here.

@baatochan and other flaggers, this package is obsolete. The correct package name is pdfstudio-bin and this will be updated there. A merge is in progress to merge the two packages together, but you can start using the correctly named one now.