Search Criteria
Package Details: perl-math-planepath 126-1
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/perl-math-planepath.git (read-only) |
---|---|
Package Base: | perl-math-planepath |
Description: | Math::PlanePath -- points on a path through the 2-D plane |
Upstream URL: | https://metacpan.org/release/Math-PlanePath/ |
Licenses: | |
Submitter: | swiftgeek |
Maintainer: | swiftgeek |
Last Packager: | swiftgeek |
Votes: | 27 |
Popularity: | 0.270542 |
First Submitted: | 2012-06-23 10:24 |
Last Updated: | 2018-03-05 13:00 |
Dependencies (3)
- perl-constant-defer
- perl-math-libm
- perl>=5.10.0 (perl-git)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 Next › Last »
yar commented on 2018-09-04 03:24
This should have checkdepends=(perl-math-bigint-lite perl-math-numseq perl-number-fraction)
christianlupus commented on 2017-12-20 22:31
I just ran in the problem like leosw mentioned. I installed manually
perl-math-libm
. This was precompiled as a dependency due to my aursync process. However it did not get installed. So I issuedpacman -Sy perl-math-libm
and this package built successfully.wehosea commented on 2017-12-12 02:44
The current version is broken. Needs to be updated to version 125 https://metacpan.org/release/Math-PlanePath
swiftgeek commented on 2015-07-01 08:01
1. Your reading skills have to improve (log clearly states which module isn't recompiled against perl 5.22)
2. To automate for all perl packages from AUR https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2015-June/027236.html
leosw commented on 2015-07-01 07:17
Current version fails to compile : http://pastebin.com/T9aWue7y
kallisti5 commented on 2014-06-23 00:22
Current version is broken.
New version:
pkgver=116
md5sum=f606f26e813615e6f93db21f678a4ab1
swiftgeek commented on 2014-06-10 04:53
But only tests and nobody cares so much about them (the purpose of tests in AUR is just to check if your perl setup is still sane, as it often break itself)
swiftgeek commented on 2014-06-10 04:50
nope
yar commented on 2014-06-10 04:04
Some tests depend on perl-math-numseq
swiftgeek commented on 2013-10-04 16:43
That's not very helpful for solving your problem and also not related to this package
(It still goes through tests fine, ya rly)