Package Details: perl-net-rawip 0.25-6

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/perl-net-rawip.git (read-only)
Package Base: perl-net-rawip
Description: Perl extension to manipulate raw IP packets with interface to B<libpcap>
Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-RawIP
Licenses: GPL, PerlArtistic
Submitter: None
Maintainer: bidulock
Last Packager: bidulock
Votes: 17
Popularity: 0.000967
First Submitted: 2010-02-19 05:47
Last Updated: 2015-07-04 03:00

Latest Comments

bidulock commented on 2015-07-02 00:09

@SIGTERM, AUR3 is frozen: you need to go to https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/perl-net-rawip/ login and disown it there.

bidulock commented on 2014-06-04 22:37

Please bump pkgrel to 5 to trigger recompile against perl 5.20.0.

bidulock commented on 2013-06-16 01:58

pleas bump pkgrel to 4 to trigger recompile against perl 5.18.0

SIGTERM commented on 2013-04-12 09:13

Thank you for your help. Hopefully, the PKGBUILD is okay now.
If there's anything else wrong with it, please contact me and I will try to fix it as soon as possible.

bidulock commented on 2013-04-12 02:53

makepkg sources your PKGBUILD file and then calls build() check() and package()
if defined and when appropriate. It defines some variables, $srcdir, $pkgdir,
before calling the functions. makepkg 4.1 no longer defines $pkgdir before
calling build() only before calling package(). This is why you cannot reference
$pkgdir in build(): it will be empty.

A typical build and package sequence for a perl module looks like:

build() {
cd "$srcdir/Module-Name-$pkgver"
PERL_MM_USE_DEFAULT=1 perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor || return 1
make
}
package() {
cd "$srcdir/Module-Name-$pkgver"
make install DESTDIR="$pkgdir" || return 1
find "${pkgdir}" -name '.packlist' -delete
find "${pkgdir}" -name '*.pod' -delete
}

SIGTERM commented on 2013-04-11 19:31

@bidulock
I have very little experience with PKGBUILDs to be honest.
I just took up maintaining this package, because no else would. Most of the time I used the Dist::Arch module to upload them. However, you seem to know quite a bit about these things, so I would much appreciate your help.

SIGTERM commented on 2013-04-11 19:31

@bidulock
I have very little experience with PKGBUILDs to be honest.
I just took up maintaining this package, because no else would. Most of the time I used the Dist::Arch module to upload them. However, you seem to know quite a bit about these things, so I would much appreciate your help.

SIGTERM commented on 2013-04-11 19:31

@bidulock
I have very little experience with PKGBUILDs to be honest.
I just took up maintaining this package, because no else would. Most of the time I used the Dist::Arch module to upload them. However, you seem to know quite a bit about these things, so I would much appreciate your help.

SIGTERM commented on 2013-04-11 19:31

@bidulock
I have very little experience with PKGBUILDs to be honest.
I just took up maintaining this package, because no else would. Most of the time I used the Dist::Arch module to upload them. However, you seem to know quite a bit about these things, so I would much appreciate your help.

SIGTERM commented on 2013-04-11 18:11

@bidulock
I have very little experience with PKGBUILDs to be honest.
I just took up maintaining this package, because no else would. Most of the time I used the Dist::Arch module to upload them. However, you seem to know quite a bit about these things, so I would much appreciate your help.

All comments