Package is NOT, I repeat, NOT out of date. It was built just after the LATEST commit in the master branch. The tag was defined AFTER the latest commit, which the current PKGBUILD reflects. You can always compare commit tags. I’ll update the PKGBUILD shortly, but it will only make you build the very same version again. Thanks, ciappi.
Search Criteria
Package Details: photoflow 0.2.8.r2.gdf03f253-1
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/photoflow.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | photoflow |
| Description: | Non-destructive, layer-based photo retouching including RAW image development |
| Upstream URL: | http://aferrero2707.github.io/PhotoFlow |
| Licenses: | GPL3 |
| Conflicts: | photoflow |
| Provides: | photoflow |
| Submitter: | Joermungand |
| Maintainer: | Joermungand |
| Last Packager: | Joermungand |
| Votes: | 6 |
| Popularity: | 0.000000 |
| First Submitted: | 2015-10-30 22:20 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2017-09-05 15:03 (UTC) |
Dependencies (7)
- gtkmm
- libgexiv2
- pugixml (pugixml-gitAUR)
- vips
- cmake (cmake-gitAUR) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR) (make)
- gobject-introspection (gobject-introspection-gitAUR) (make)
Pinned Comments
Joermungand commented on 2018-05-10 15:37 (UTC)
The issue is caused by the upgrade of gcc to 8.1 a couple of days ago. I have not managed to sort it out satisfactorily, yet, so please use
photoflow-gitinstead (for which I’ve found a workaround), until things get back to normal. As a matter of fact, the developer himself suggests users should choose the git version, as it dramatically improves on the stable version. The updated PKGBUILD for that one also fixes the other issues you’ve raised.