Absolutely yes. Server package do it and I need to align this package to. As I always said, this package deserve more love.
Search Criteria
Package Details: pi-hole-standalone 5.17.3-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/pi-hole-standalone.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | pi-hole-standalone |
Description: | The Pi-hole is an advertising-aware DNS/Web server. Arch alteration for standalone PC. |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole |
Keywords: | ad block pi-hole |
Licenses: | EUPL-1.2 |
Conflicts: | pi-hole-server |
Submitter: | max.bra |
Maintainer: | max.bra |
Last Packager: | max.bra |
Votes: | 8 |
Popularity: | 0.94 |
First Submitted: | 2016-01-13 12:39 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-01-08 10:39 (UTC) |
Dependencies (9)
- bind-tools (bind-developmentAUR, bind-gitAUR, bind)
- inetutils (inetutils-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR)
- iproute2 (iproute2-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR, iproute2-selinuxAUR)
- lsof (lsof-gitAUR)
- netcat (nmap-netcatAUR, openbsd-netcat-gitAUR, gnu-netcat-svnAUR, gnu-netcat, openbsd-netcat)
- pi-hole-ftlAUR
- procps-ng (procps-ng-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR)
- sudo (nosudoAUR, fake-sudoAUR, polkit-fakesudoAUR, sudo-gitAUR, doas-sudo-shimAUR, doas-sudo-shim-minimalAUR, sudo-hgAUR, sudo-selinuxAUR, fudo-gitAUR)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-fcAUR) (make)
Required by (1)
- pi-hole-whitelist-git (optional)
Sources (11)
- dnsmasq.include
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/max72bra/pi-hole-standalone-archlinux-customization/master/arch-server-core-5.17.3-1.patch
- mimic_basic-install.sh
- mimic_setupVars.conf.sh
- pi-hole-gravity.service
- pi-hole-gravity.timer
- pi-hole-logtruncate.service
- pi-hole-logtruncate.timer
- pi-hole-standalone-core-5.17.3.tar.gz
- pi-hole.tmpfile
- piholeDebug.sh
max.bra commented on 2019-07-26 18:37 (UTC)
sonny commented on 2019-07-26 18:32 (UTC)
Okay it's working.
Thanks for the packages and helping out.
I spent a lot of time trying to make this work, wouldn't make more sense to just have pacman do that?
max.bra commented on 2019-07-26 18:22 (UTC)
Don't know why but I missed some wiki modifications: a step is missing. I need to align this installation to the server one. Can you please copy ""/usr/share/pihole/configs/dnsmasq.example.conf" to /etc/dnsmasq.conf and restart ftl?
sonny commented on 2019-07-26 18:05 (UTC)
Okay I just replaced pi-hole-standalone with pi-hole-server to test and it's working. Let me know if I can help debug this somehow.
max.bra commented on 2019-07-26 18:03 (UTC)
With no-resolv directive dnsmasq should not read that file
sonny commented on 2019-07-26 17:55 (UTC)
I did follow the wiki, I don't have systemd-resolved running. As I said, pihole is running and working, tested with
drill @127.0.0.1 TXT archlinux.org
it just seems to stop working as soon as I have nameserver 127.0.0.1
in my /etc/resolv.conf
max.bra commented on 2019-07-26 17:41 (UTC)
Hi sonny. Have you followed the wiki? Is ftl working or stops soon after starting? Nothing about systemd dns stub disabling?
sonny commented on 2019-07-26 16:42 (UTC) (edited on 2019-07-26 16:42 (UTC) by sonny)
Apparently pihole-FTL is reading my /etc/resolv.conf
, could it be the problem?
juil. 26 18:41:05 evoli dnsmasq[9452]: reading /etc/resolv.conf
juil. 26 18:41:05 evoli dnsmasq[9452]: using nameserver 192.168.0.1#53
sonny commented on 2019-07-26 16:39 (UTC)
I can't make this work. pihole is started and running (drill @127.0.0.1 TXT archlinux.org works)
I have name_servers=127.0.0.1
in my /etc/resolvconf.conf
.
But everytime my /etc/resolv.conf
looks like nameserver 127.0.0.1
DNS is not working.
Any idea?
marza commented on 2019-02-22 08:34 (UTC)
Thanks for the fix and updates, everything works flawlessly here :D
Pinned Comments
max.bra commented on 2018-02-09 16:47 (UTC) (edited on 2019-10-18 23:14 (UTC) by max.bra)
ArchLinux Pi-hole is not officially supported by Pi-hole project. In case of bugs and malfunctions please DO NOT file a report upstream.
First of all check if the wiki (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pi-hole) can help then ask here for assistance and tips.
When it will be excluded that the problem does not depend on ArchLinux we will file a bug upstream.