Search Criteria
Package Details: picoscope7beta 7.1.48_1r5000-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/picoscope7beta.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | picoscope7beta |
Description: | PicoScope 7 Test and Measurment Early Access |
Upstream URL: | https://oem.picotech.com/p7beta/download |
Keywords: | picoscope picoscope7 picoscope7beta |
Licenses: | custom |
Conflicts: | picoscope7 |
Provides: | picoscope7 |
Submitter: | Schorsch |
Maintainer: | Schorsch |
Last Packager: | Schorsch |
Votes: | 4 |
Popularity: | 0.000012 |
First Submitted: | 2022-02-05 23:21 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-02-21 02:03 (UTC) |
Dependencies (16)
- desktop-file-utils (desktop-file-utils-gitAUR)
- fuse2
- ps7b_libpicocvAUR
- ps7b_libpicoippAUR
- ttf-roboto (ttf-roboto-fontconfigAUR, ttf-roboto-variableAUR, ttf-google-fonts-typewolfAUR)
- which (busybox-coreutilsAUR, which-gitAUR)
- ps7b_libps2000AUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 2000 series
- ps7b_libps2000aAUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 2000a series
- ps7b_libps3000AUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 3000 series
- ps7b_libps3000aAUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 3000a series
- ps7b_libps4000AUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 4000 series
- ps7b_libps4000aAUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 4000a series
- ps7b_libps5000AUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 5000 series
- ps7b_libps5000aAUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 5000a series
- ps7b_libps6000AUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 6000 series
- ps7b_libps6000aAUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 6000a series
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last »
yan12125 commented on 2022-11-21 12:29 (UTC)
The wrapper script
/opt/picoscope/bin/picoscope
needs thewhich
command. Could you addwhich
to depends?Schorsch commented on 2022-10-16 19:45 (UTC)
@jclsn Thanks for letting me know and sorry about that. For some reason my regex suddenly stopped working. I think there are some weird non-printable characters on the download website somewhere. Not sure what the issue was, but packages should be updated automatically again now.
jclsn commented on 2022-10-16 10:14 (UTC) (edited on 2022-10-16 10:24 (UTC) by jclsn)
Does anyone else have problems getting the Picoscope 2204a recognized lately? I saw there was a libps2000a update some time ago. I already tried downgrading, but it didn't help.
EDIT: Ah the libps2000 is deprecated.
Schorsch commented on 2022-06-08 05:55 (UTC) (edited on 2022-06-08 06:32 (UTC) by Schorsch)
@AndrewD As mentioned in the pinned comment, I have an automatic build system that checks for updates and updates the packages once a day at 00:00 UTC.
Looks like this is mostly still working except for the ps7b_libps5000 and ps7b_libps5000a where my git push gets rejected for having an incorrect .SRCINFO file. So far I have not been able to determine the cause of the issue...
Just tested the rest of the packages though and they appear to work just fine.
EDIT: libps5000(a) packages are now up to date too.
EDIT: @AndrewD Curious that the package was updated on 30.05.2022 but my script only picked it up today, pretty sure the build would have failed if the file wasn't available. Did you by chance notice that there were 2 picoscope*.deb files in the source directory https://labs.picotech.com/rc/picoscope7/debian/pool/main/p/picoscope ? The script so far assumed that there would only ever be one file listed, so that might explain it. In that case the package would have still worked, though just for the older version.
AndrewD commented on 2022-06-08 00:11 (UTC) (edited on 2022-06-08 00:11 (UTC) by AndrewD)
The beta was updated 2022-05-30 to 7.0.101-1r11513 so the PKGBUILD needs a tweak as the old version is no longer available. libs need updating too.
I appreciate your efforts maintaining this. Something like this worked for the main package:
Schorsch commented on 2022-04-13 20:28 (UTC)
@bossamba Thanks for letting me know, all packages updated! Unfortunately the pinned libusb issue still seems to persist.
bossamba commented on 2022-04-13 18:16 (UTC)
It seems, there is an update necessary again, would you be so kind:
Schorsch commented on 2022-03-12 19:52 (UTC)
@smfelsher Hey, thanks for letting me know, I've updated the packages, so they should work again.
Unfortunately Pico removes old packages from the source when they update, so these AUR packages break on every source update. I don't know of a proper way to get around that, as I would assume I'm not allowed to host their packages elsewhere.
For now I'll just have to rely on periodically checking manually, or have people letting me know :)
smfelsher commented on 2022-03-12 18:47 (UTC)
The source file,
picoscope_7.0.93-1r10549_amd64.deb
, does not exist on the Picotech website; so this package fails to build.« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last »