Package Details: pisg 0.73-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pisg.git (read-only)
Package Base: pisg
Description: An irc log parser
Upstream URL: http://pisg.sourceforge.net/
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: None
Maintainer: nous
Last Packager: nous
Votes: 9
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2005-05-06 12:23
Last Updated: 2015-06-11 12:51

Dependencies (1)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

nous commented on 2014-04-14 15:26

Besides moving the config files from /etc to /usr/share (which I'm not very fond of), is there any other difference?

ravomavain commented on 2014-04-13 15:38

http://pastebin.archlinux.fr/499541

kbar commented on 2012-07-04 19:20

@uuberben I've been meaning to fix this package... if you would like to take ownership and fix it, go ahead.

uberben commented on 2012-07-04 18:50

I spoke too soon: more errors.

Could not load pisg! Reason:
/usr/bin/pisg: Unable to open stylesheet layout/default.css: No such file or directory

I symlinked /etc/pisg/layout to /opt/pisg/layout

Now things are *actually* working properly.

uberben commented on 2012-07-04 18:44

I seem to be having some issues with the latest release.

First this, the binary moved from /opt/pisg/pisg to /usr/bin/pisg (and it also deleted my pisg.cfg).

Next, I got this:

Could not load pisg! Reason:
Can't locate Pisg.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/bin/modules/ /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/share/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_p
erl /usr/lib/perl5/core_perl /usr/share/perl5/core_perl .) at (eval 1) line 2.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 1) line 2.

I edited the /usr/bin/pisg to use the /usr/lib/pisg/modules dir directly. Then I got complaints about lang.txt:

Could not load pisg! Reason:
/usr/bin/pisg: Unable to open language file(lang.txt): No such file or directory

I sym-linked the /etc/pisg/lang.txt file to /opt/pisg/lang.txt and things are working again.

Anonymous comment on 2012-06-27 22:40

updated, builds for 64bit - i don't have local machine irc logs to test the actual package on so feel free to speak up for adoption.

Ttech commented on 2010-07-08 03:58

Could use support for x86_64 there's nothing in this package that depends on x86