Package Details: pkgbrowser 0.24-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pkgbrowser
Description: A utility for browsing pacman databases and the AUR
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL2
Submitter: kachelaqa
Maintainer: kachelaqa
Last Packager: kachelaqa
Votes: 275
Popularity: 0.64
First Submitted: 2011-04-20 18:18
Last Updated: 2020-12-03 13:28

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Next › Last »

Kewl commented on 2021-03-24 21:35

what is the use of python<3.10, is it expected to break with 3.10 ? Same about the pacman condition.

btw, soon the 10th anniversary of the tool!

Kr1ss commented on 2020-12-05 16:37

@masterberg fakeroot is member of base-devel, hence it shouldn't be explicitely declared as makedepend. Same applies to make.

See the according paragraph in the PKGBUILD wiki.

masterberg commented on 2020-12-05 16:34

Missing fakeroot and make package as build dependency

blackhole commented on 2020-12-03 06:27

Removed 'python<3.9' and rebuild package

simona commented on 2020-12-02 13:39

none, 3.6 is too old:
:: l'installazione di python (3.6.0-2) interrompe la dipendenza 'python>=3.8' richiesta da archinstall-gui
:: l'installazione di python (3.6.0-2) interrompe la dipendenza 'python>=3.8' richiesta da autojump-git
:: l'installazione di python (3.6.0-2) interrompe la dipendenza 'python>=3.7' richiesta da libreoffice-fresh
can't uninstall libreoffice.

ringo32 commented on 2020-12-02 11:51

rebuild pkgbrowser on 3.9 change the pkgbuild to handle 3.9

simona commented on 2020-12-02 10:53

:: l'installazione di python (3.9.0-1) interrompe la dipendenza 'python<3.9' richiesta da pkgbrowser

blackhole commented on 2020-12-02 09:40

After the last system update:

-> Could not find all required packages: python<3.9 (Wanted by: pkgbrowser)

kachelaqa commented on 2020-12-01 21:50

@Autodidaddy It's probably due to some changes (or a bug) in Qt. The text in the text-box should be automatically selected when it gets the input focus (which it still does if you tab out and back in again). However, it would probably be better if there was a permanent blank item at the start of the search history, which would bypass the issue. I may implement this at some point, but I hardly ever look at the code any more, so don't hold your breath...

Autodidaddy commented on 2020-12-01 05:01

Used to be I could start typing right away. After update I have to clear the old entry first every time. Bug?