Package Details: pkgbrowser 0.22-2

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pkgbrowser
Description: A utility for browsing pacman databases and the AUR
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL2
Submitter: kachelaqa
Maintainer: kachelaqa
Last Packager: kachelaqa
Votes: 272
Popularity: 0.196493
First Submitted: 2011-04-20 18:18
Last Updated: 2019-11-14 22:19

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last »

Anonymous comment on 2013-09-03 07:41

pkgbrowser-0.16.tar.gz seems having wrong md5 in current pkgbuild, replacing with "c0e69dce6de4cc8910842bf5d720f376" works fine.

kachelaqa commented on 2013-08-24 21:38

Thanks for the feedback. I have answered your questions on the pkgbrowser arch forum thread:

DaveCode commented on 2013-08-24 04:54

PkgBrowser shows the mystery 4 under Foreign/Non-Installed.

PkgBrowser lists the binary Xyne-I686 repo we use, but not pkgs installed from it, under Xyne heading anyway. They're shown under AUR. keeps a binary repo and maintains the same pkgs in AUR. So you can install his goods either way. We use his binary repo for simplicity. PkgBrowser is showing Xyne stuff coming from AUR, incorrectly. - thanks -

DaveCode commented on 2013-08-24 04:42

Voted. Totally belongs in extra. Beautiful. I love that it's a browser only, not installer - safe for users and lets me not worry over some GUI app. I just use pacaur -Syu every night.

I am confused on something. With an up-to-date system, PkgBrowser Updates shows 4 pkgs with Status "downgrade" - all from AUR - and only those 4. These 4 AUR pkgs do not replace any mainline ones. They only exist in AUR. There's nothing to downgrade to...?

kregexpeditor-git 491.f618b59-1
prezto-git 20130503-1
python3-aur 2013.6-1
ttf-sil-fonts 6-1

kachelaqa commented on 2013-06-21 17:59

Thanks - pkgbuild is now up to date

jean_no commented on 2013-06-21 16:59

Can you change the dependancie : python2-pyqt to python2-pyqt4 after update 06/17/2013

kachelaqa commented on 2013-06-02 22:28

That error message is not from PkgBrowser. Not sure what would produce it: the display manager, maybe?

teateawhy commented on 2013-06-02 16:57

A very unspecific error popped up in the end of the installation: (translated)
Error: Command could not be executed.
Anyway the application is working fine.

kachelaqa commented on 2013-04-05 18:24

Sorry - I should have updated the PKGBUILD to reflect the fact that pkgbrowser won't work with pacman-4.1. I haven't looked at pacman-4.1 at all yet, so it may be a while before I can make a compatible release.

fank1 commented on 2013-04-05 14:49

I reported the issue here, and assume it has to do with the pacman upgrade somehow.